Things that annoy you beyond reason...(Vol 5)

Things that annoy you beyond reason...(Vol 5)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Clockwork Cupcake

74,568 posts

272 months

Sunday 22nd July 2018
quotequote all
Rich_W said:
This? confused
Kind of, but not so side-on.

It's one of the most basic model poses.

Frank7

6,619 posts

87 months

Sunday 22nd July 2018
quotequote all
nonsequitur said:
Well done Frank,thumbup You sussed the light-heartedness of my reply. It was too good a post to go ignore:.
ps, How did you know that I live in Reading? scratchchin
Oh you’re good nonsequitur, you’re very
good, keep ‘em coming, I applaud you. clap

Clockwork Cupcake

74,568 posts

272 months

Sunday 22nd July 2018
quotequote all
I think I may have mentioned this before, but what annoys me beyond reason today is companies that
a) force you to create an account before you can order and then
b) if you add items to your basket, and then decide to think about things a little before clicking "buy", they then pester you by email to complete the order. Oh, sure, they dress it up as "can we assist you in completing your order?" but what they mean is "OMG we saw we almost got a big order. Please complete it! Please! Pleeeease! Pleeeeeeeeeeeease! Ah g'wan. G'wan, g'wan, g'wam. Y'will y'will y'wll. Ah g'wan."

My ex used to run an online business and used to do this, and it's one of the many things we didn't see eye-to-eye on. I am convinced it drives customers away rather than encouraging them to complete their order. It certainly puts me off.

(Yes, I acknowledge that sometimes it is useful. You may have thought you completed the order process and they might inform you that the order didn't complete. But on the whole, it whiffs of desperation and nagging)


227bhp

10,203 posts

128 months

Sunday 22nd July 2018
quotequote all
F1 and the news, the BBC news.

Why do we need to know who is fastest in free practice? We don't, it's totally irrelevant to anything.
On Sunday do we need to know who has won before it's on terrestrial TV? No we don't.
Those who have seen it don't need to know.
Those who haven't seen it don't want to know.
Those who don't follow it don't want to know either.

It's not news.

Frank7

6,619 posts

87 months

Monday 23rd July 2018
quotequote all
Frank7 said:
nonsequitur said:
Well done Frank,thumbup You sussed the light-heartedness of my reply. It was too good a post to go ignore:.
ps, How did you know that I live in Reading? scratchchin
Oh you’re good nonsequitur, you’re very
good, keep ‘em coming, I applaud you. clap
As if to illustrate that nonsequitur was right that I was getting annoyed for no good reason, that my wife’s 60 y.o. brother turns to her for stuff that a ten y.o. could do for himself, he called her around 09.30 today.
He’d spent the weekend at a hotel in Kent, he said to her, (my hand to God), “The nearest station is XXXXX, go online and find out the times of trains to London Victoria, and call me back, thanks sis.”
Nothing wrong there, eh?

Europa1

10,923 posts

188 months

Monday 23rd July 2018
quotequote all
227bhp said:
F1 and the news, the BBC news.

Why do we need to know who is fastest in free practice? We don't, it's totally irrelevant to anything.
On Sunday do we need to know who has won before it's on terrestrial TV? No we don't.
Those who have seen it don't need to know.
Those who haven't seen it don't want to know.
Those who don't follow it don't want to know either.

It's not news.
I'm not sure you've grasped how news works.

glenrobbo

35,266 posts

150 months

Monday 23rd July 2018
quotequote all
Europa1 said:
227bhp said:
F1 and the news, the BBC news.

Why do we need to know who is fastest in free practice? We don't, it's totally irrelevant to anything.
On Sunday do we need to know who has won before it's on terrestrial TV? No we don't.
Those who have seen it don't need to know.
Those who haven't seen it don't want to know.
Those who don't follow it don't want to know either.

It's not news.
I'm not sure you've grasped how news works.
To be fair, they could give a Spoiler alert before ruining 227bhp's day!
But it's Seb I feel sorry for! biggrin

talksthetorque

10,815 posts

135 months

Monday 23rd July 2018
quotequote all
handpaper said:
Ink in 5 litre jugs is not bulk. Ink in 1000 litre IBCs or 25,000 litre tankers is bulk:
World class willy waving, you win. hehe
(I bet that's not digital ink though, and they were 10 litre jugs btw getmecoat )

Teebs

4,372 posts

215 months

Monday 23rd July 2018
quotequote all
Companies using social 'influencers' on Instagram et al for advertising products. It's a complete and utter scam, of course these people like the product, they're getting paid to enjoy it.

How anyone is influenced by these morons I have no idea, it's a sad reflection upon a society that can't think for themselves.

Clockwork Cupcake

74,568 posts

272 months

Monday 23rd July 2018
quotequote all
Teebs said:
Companies using social 'influencers' on Instagram et al for advertising products. It's a complete and utter scam, of course these people like the product, they're getting paid to enjoy it.

How anyone is influenced by these morons I have no idea, it's a sad reflection upon a society that can't think for themselves.
Oh come on, Celebrity Endorsements have been around forever. It's just the definition of "Celebrity" has changed, that's all.

Companies have always paid people with social influence to influence potential customers into becoming actual customers.

captain_cynic

12,008 posts

95 months

Monday 23rd July 2018
quotequote all
Clockwork Cupcake said:
Oh come on, Celebrity Endorsements have been around forever. It's just the definition of "Celebrity" has changed, that's all.

Companies have always paid people with social influence to influence potential customers into becoming actual customers.
This.

Companies have figured out that it gets the same level of publicity as using a minor celebrity (I.E. some tart from Hollyoaks) but costs far less.

Gary29

4,159 posts

99 months

Monday 23rd July 2018
quotequote all
Clockwork Cupcake said:
Kind of, but not so side-on.

It's one of the most basic model poses.
This?


GroundEffect

13,836 posts

156 months

Monday 23rd July 2018
quotequote all
glenrobbo said:
Last weekend I stayed in a hotel just outside Swansea.

After checking in I went to the bar and picked up a copy of the bar tariff/menu to see what refreshing beverages were available:

They had an IPA. .......... 5.4

I asked the bar tender ( not a barman yet, as he was far too young ) whether that was the ABV of said IPA?
"No", he replied, "the ABV is 5.9" ( Wow! A bit strong for an IPA, but there you go. )

"Then what is the 5.4?" I enquired.

"That is the price" he said.

5.4? scratchchin 5.4 what exactly?

I wondered if it was some strange Welsh currency that I hadn't encountered previously.

Apparently it was Pounds Sterling.
£££££s.
GBP

£5.40

For a pint of IPA? yikes

"Yes Sir, this particular splendid IPA is crafted in Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Bloody hellfire, is it flown over here by private chartered jet?


I settled for a pint of Black Sheep at 4.8 whatevers.



Are they so hard up that they couldn't afford to pay to have the £ signs or 0s included in the price list?

Or is this one of those new fking pretentious designer "trends"?

Or are they so ashamed of their rip-off prices that they are trying to disguise them by omitting any notion of currency units?

I could understand if the hotel.had been in Knightsbridge.
But not fking Swansea irked FFS!

I get more worked up the more I think about it.




Edited by glenrobbo on Sunday 22 July 11:41
That's been a trend on menus for a while. It's designed to look more minimalist, and without a currency sign makes people spend more (psychological).





droopsnoot

11,943 posts

242 months

Monday 23rd July 2018
quotequote all
glenrobbo said:
£5.40

For a pint of IPA? yikes
Yes, that annoyed me about a new place that's opened up locally - £5.10 for a pint (not sure what of, presumably lager) when the rest of town struggles along at £3.30-£3.80 depending on the product. And they don't have a lemonade dispenser thing (not sure of the proper name, the snake head thing) so if you want a lager with some lemonade in it for some reason, that's another £1.50 for a mixer bottle of lemonade. So £6.60 for a pint of lager shandy.

Full every time I walked past, though, so maybe it's me that's wrong.



MartG

20,679 posts

204 months

Monday 23rd July 2018
quotequote all
GroundEffect said:
glenrobbo said:
Last weekend I stayed in a hotel just outside Swansea.

After checking in I went to the bar and picked up a copy of the bar tariff/menu to see what refreshing beverages were available:

They had an IPA. .......... 5.4

I asked the bar tender ( not a barman yet, as he was far too young ) whether that was the ABV of said IPA?
"No", he replied, "the ABV is 5.9" ( Wow! A bit strong for an IPA, but there you go. )

"Then what is the 5.4?" I enquired.

"That is the price" he said.

5.4? scratchchin 5.4 what exactly?

I wondered if it was some strange Welsh currency that I hadn't encountered previously.

Apparently it was Pounds Sterling.
£££££s.
GBP

£5.40

For a pint of IPA? yikes

"Yes Sir, this particular splendid IPA is crafted in Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Bloody hellfire, is it flown over here by private chartered jet?


I settled for a pint of Black Sheep at 4.8 whatevers.



Are they so hard up that they couldn't afford to pay to have the £ signs or 0s included in the price list?

Or is this one of those new fking pretentious designer "trends"?

Or are they so ashamed of their rip-off prices that they are trying to disguise them by omitting any notion of currency units?

I could understand if the hotel.had been in Knightsbridge.
But not fking Swansea irked FFS!

I get more worked up the more I think about it.




Edited by glenrobbo on Sunday 22 July 11:41
That's been a trend on menus for a while. It's designed to look more minimalist, and without a currency sign makes people spend more (psychological).
If a pricelist doesn't specify the currency e.g. the 5.4 mentioned above, could you pay in whatever you wanted ? Offer 5.4 biscuits for example ?

Cotty

39,544 posts

284 months

Monday 23rd July 2018
quotequote all
droopsnoot said:
And they don't have a lemonade dispenser thing (not sure of the proper name, the snake head thing)
I think its called a bargun.

Schroeder Bargun and Wunder-Bar Gun seems to be most popular

Clockwork Cupcake

74,568 posts

272 months

Monday 23rd July 2018
quotequote all
Cotty said:
Schroeder Bargun and Wunder-Bar Gun seems to be most popular
There is also Schroedinger's Bargun - it only has one button and you don't know what will come out until you press it. silly

nonsequitur

20,083 posts

116 months

Monday 23rd July 2018
quotequote all
Frank7 said:
Frank7 said:
nonsequitur said:
Well done Frank,thumbup You sussed the light-heartedness of my reply. It was too good a post to go ignore:.
ps, How did you know that I live in Reading? scratchchin
Oh you’re good nonsequitur, you’re very
good, keep ‘em coming, I applaud you. clap
As if to illustrate that nonsequitur was right that I was getting annoyed for no good reason, that my wife’s 60 y.o. brother turns to her for stuff that a ten y.o. could do for himself, he called her around 09.30 today.
He’d spent the weekend at a hotel in Kent, he said to her, (my hand to God), “The nearest station is XXXXX, go online and find out the times of trains to London Victoria, and call me back, thanks sis.”
Nothing wrong there, eh?
Thank you Frank. Your additional explanation does make your BIL sound a tad ecentric.

RizzoTheRat

25,166 posts

192 months

Monday 23rd July 2018
quotequote all
227bhp said:
F1 and the news, the BBC news.

Why do we need to know who is fastest in free practice? We don't, it's totally irrelevant to anything.
On Sunday do we need to know who has won before it's on terrestrial TV? No we don't.
Those who have seen it don't need to know.
Those who haven't seen it don't want to know.
Those who don't follow it don't want to know either.

It's not news.
In a similar vein...

I have no interest in football, and was in the car during the last England game the other week, listening to the radio. Between every song they'd have a quick mention of the football and the current score. Why? Surely anyone who wanted to follow the football would be listening on a station that was broadcasting it, and their audience would be mainly people who aren't interested, and people who were planning to watch it on catch up when they got home so didn't want to know the score.

It must be bloody annoying if you're in to sport but aren't able to watch it live as it's nearly impossible to avoid hearing about it .

nonsequitur

20,083 posts

116 months

Monday 23rd July 2018
quotequote all
RizzoTheRat said:
227bhp said:
F1 and the news, the BBC news.

Why do we need to know who is fastest in free practice? We don't, it's totally irrelevant to anything.
On Sunday do we need to know who has won before it's on terrestrial TV? No we don't.
Those who have seen it don't need to know.
Those who haven't seen it don't want to know.
Those who don't follow it don't want to know either.

It's not news.
In a similar vein...

I have no interest in football, and was in the car during the last England game the other week, listening to the radio. Between every song they'd have a quick mention of the football and the current score. Why? Surely anyone who wanted to follow the football would be listening on a station that was broadcasting it, and their audience would be mainly people who aren't interested, and people who were planning to watch it on catch up when they got home so didn't want to know the score.

It must be bloody annoying if you're in to sport but aren't able to watch it live as it's nearly impossible to avoid hearing about it .
Just one thing. ' The Likely Lads ' trying to avoid hearing the footie score so it won't spoil the highlights later on. Classic comedy, Classic surprise ending.hehe

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED