Things that annoy you beyond reason...(Vol 5)

Things that annoy you beyond reason...(Vol 5)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

droopsnoot

11,971 posts

243 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
Cobnapint said:
DavieW said:
Local people on local roads with a sat nav stuck to their window - do they expect to get lost travelling from the shop/work/family to their own home?
Good one.

They think having an illuminated display in their car makes the car more 'modern'.
It annoys me how many satnav users seem to have it stuck right in the centre of the windscreen, and in "day mode" colours after dark. Obviously that's the only reason I can see it, but don't these people consider how much it affects night vision, and vision in general? (Rhetorical question, obviously)

nicanary

9,799 posts

147 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
IIRC Uggs were an Australian idea as an alternative for slippers. Theye were created to wear as something comfy round the house together with PJs or onesies. I doubt the maker ever expected people to wear them outdoors, thus their tendency to collapse when faced with solid pavements and a journey to the corner shop for fags and scratchcards.

TameRacingDriver

18,094 posts

273 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
V8mate said:
TameRacingDriver said:
A self entitled little tart at work who barged in front of everyone else who were waiting patiently for the lift at work this morning irritated me more than it probably should. Clearly thought she was more important than everyone else. Probably late for her boss who was patiently waiting for his blow job.
Turned you down, did she?
Wouldn't touch her with yours smile

She was also wearing BOSE headphones. Rude and lack of taste.

glenrobbo

35,289 posts

151 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
Johnspex said:
glenrobbo said:
DavieW said:
Local people on local roads with a sat nav stuck to their window - do they expect to get lost travelling from the shop/work/family to their own home?
Are you sure they are not dashcams? You never know when some idiot is going to pull out straight in front of you from a side road these days. rolleyes
What on Earth do you mean? People have been doing that since the car was invented.
Sorry there's no 'WHOOSH!' left in it for you...



Consider it to be the equivalent of a Duke of Edinburgh Award. wink

Rawwr

22,722 posts

235 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
Johnspex said:
Rawwr said:
People who say 'scamera'.
Don't criticise people who say scamera. They are the Oscar Wildes and P G Wodehouse of the 21st century. They are the wits that gave you Fleabay. Scumtree, Daily Fail/Wail Halfrauds and probably spell surely as Shirley.
Eugh, you're right. It's just anti-humour to my eyes and I do genuinely wonder if the perpetrators believe they're being witty and original, and how they'd respond if it was pointed out that it really isn't either.

It's the same category of horsesh*t as repeating catchphrases and I get this overwhelming urge to push down a well anyone who says; "Am I bovvered?", "You are the weakest link! Goodbye!", "Are you going out out?", "Garlic bread!" or any other of the hundreds of stale lumps of recycled sh*t that people trot out. I'd hit them all with my car if I thought I'd could away with it.

Clockwork Cupcake

74,602 posts

273 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
Rawwr said:
I'd hit them all with my car if I thought I'd could away with it.
You could always throw a can of Red Bull at them, or take off and nuke them from orbit. silly

wink

Rawwr

22,722 posts

235 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
Clockwork Cupcake said:
Rawwr said:
I'd hit them all with my car if I thought I'd could away with it.
You could always throw a can of Red Bull at them, or take off and nuke them from orbit. silly

wink

Roger Irrelevant

2,943 posts

114 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
Rawwr said:
Johnspex said:
Rawwr said:
People who say 'scamera'.
Don't criticise people who say scamera. They are the Oscar Wildes and P G Wodehouse of the 21st century. They are the wits that gave you Fleabay. Scumtree, Daily Fail/Wail Halfrauds and probably spell surely as Shirley.
Eugh, you're right. It's just anti-humour to my eyes and I do genuinely wonder if the perpetrators believe they're being witty and original, and how they'd respond if it was pointed out that it really isn't either.

It's the same category of horsesh*t as repeating catchphrases and I get this overwhelming urge to push down a well anyone who says; "Am I bovvered?", "You are the weakest link! Goodbye!", "Are you going out out?", "Garlic bread!" or any other of the hundreds of stale lumps of recycled sh*t that people trot out. I'd hit them all with my car if I thought I'd could away with it.
I always fall about when some wag uses the rejoinder 'Should've [or quite possibly 'should of'] gone to Specsavers'. Using 'stealer' instead of 'dealer' is also wordplay worthy of the Bard.

FourWheelDrift

88,551 posts

285 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
[redacted]

alorotom

11,944 posts

188 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
yellowjack said:
loudlashadjuster said:
Clockwork Cupcake said:
had ham said:
Ask anyone who's wearing them 'why', and a pound to a penny says they'll respond with a 'because they're comfy'.
And this is a bad thing?

Men's shoes are, on the whole, comfortable and easy to live with all day without feeling like your feet have been permanently crippled by the end of the day. The same can't be said for ladies shoes, sadly.

So "because they're comfy" is a big deal and comes much higher up the priority list than satisfying the sartorial requirements of a random male stranger.
They are also spectacularly impractical as winter footwear. The slightest risk of rain, snow or (worst) slush and anyone I know with them refuses to go out in theirs, lest they get their stupid £200 ferry wellies ruined.
Ruined you say?

About 98.73% of Ugg boots I've seen being worn have already been "ruined"...



yuck

...feckin' horrid things.
Ah the footwear people seem to think fashionable to hate.

Except the vast majority you see are fake. I’ve know loads of friends who have them - real ones - and they’ll say the same that only fake ones collapse like that. The wife has c.8pairs on the go at any one time all last really well and take a lot of abuse and use.

Also it’s a total fallacy that they’re no good in the wet - they have a reasonable level of waterproofing out of the box and Ugg also sell as part of their conditioning kit the spray that makes them totally waterproof and water repelling - my wife uses one of her pairs for dog walking as an example and they regularly get a good mudding and soaking and still look fine and perform as they should

Frank7

6,619 posts

88 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
TameRacingDriver said:
Wouldn't touch her with yours smile

She was also wearing BOSE headphones. Rude and lack of taste.
A bit OT here, but I always thought that Bose was supposed to be the Rolls-Royce of speakers, although I don’t have any.
Some 15 years back, we were in Savannah GA, when I got a text from my youngest son, it said, “Dad, I’m looking for a set of Bose speakers, but they are an arm and a leg here, I’ve been quoted £X, if you can get a set cheaper in the U.S., I’d appreciate it if you’d get them for me, love, your son X”
I went online, and found what he wanted, for at least 33% less than they were in U.K., including U.S. tax.
Bummer was, the nearest outlet was in Dawsonville GA, a tad over 300 miles from Savannah.
Still, what are dads for, he got his speakers okay.

chemistry

2,159 posts

110 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
Jar of Happiness (wife’s)...meet your nemesis...


gregs656

10,903 posts

182 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
Frank7 said:
A bit OT here, but I always thought that Bose was supposed to be the Rolls-Royce of speakers, although I don’t have any.
Then you thought wrong.

Their noise cancelling headphones are still well regarded, though.

bernhund

3,767 posts

194 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
We get our shopping delivered by Sainsbury's and though we are all told that carrier bags are a 'NO' and that we will be shamed if we buy one, every single refrigerated item they deliver is in a small plastic bag. The very nature of the item means it's already in a sealed plastic package of sorts, so why does it now need a bag too? And if it does, why not put a number of items in one bigger bag? I think we used to call them carrier bags? Every week we literally throw away 20 or more small plastic bags.that were wrapped around an already packaged item. I don't get it!

TameRacingDriver

18,094 posts

273 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
Frank7 said:
A bit OT here, but I always thought that Bose was supposed to be the Rolls-Royce of speakers, although I don’t have any.
No doubt thats what people who buy them think they are, but in reality, those with even a little knowledge on audio know that they are mediocre at best for the prices they like to charge. It's a bit like paying Mercedes money, getting the badge, but getting a Vauxhall underneath it all.

j_4m

1,574 posts

65 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
TameRacingDriver said:
Frank7 said:
A bit OT here, but I always thought that Bose was supposed to be the Rolls-Royce of speakers, although I don’t have any.
No doubt thats what people who buy them think they are, but in reality, those with even a little knowledge on audio know that they are mediocre at best for the prices they like to charge. It's a bit like paying Mercedes money, getting the badge, but getting a Vauxhall underneath it all.
Yep, when stuff like Dutch And Dutch exists Bose is very much just towards the top of the low-end market.

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
alorotom said:
yellowjack said:
loudlashadjuster said:
Clockwork Cupcake said:
had ham said:
Ask anyone who's wearing them 'why', and a pound to a penny says they'll respond with a 'because they're comfy'.
And this is a bad thing?

Men's shoes are, on the whole, comfortable and easy to live with all day without feeling like your feet have been permanently crippled by the end of the day. The same can't be said for ladies shoes, sadly.

So "because they're comfy" is a big deal and comes much higher up the priority list than satisfying the sartorial requirements of a random male stranger.
They are also spectacularly impractical as winter footwear. The slightest risk of rain, snow or (worst) slush and anyone I know with them refuses to go out in theirs, lest they get their stupid £200 ferry wellies ruined.
Ruined you say?

About 98.73% of Ugg boots I've seen being worn have already been "ruined"...



yuck

...feckin' horrid things.
Ah the footwear people seem to think fashionable to hate.

Except the vast majority you see are fake. I’ve know loads of friends who have them - real ones - and they’ll say the same that only fake ones collapse like that. The wife has c.8pairs on the go at any one time all last really well and take a lot of abuse and use.

Also it’s a total fallacy that they’re no good in the wet - they have a reasonable level of waterproofing out of the box and Ugg also sell as part of their conditioning kit the spray that makes them totally waterproof and water repelling - my wife uses one of her pairs for dog walking as an example and they regularly get a good mudding and soaking and still look fine and perform as they should
Mrs OB is the same. She's got about 6 pairs of uggs and they take loads of abuse. She even wears them daily (almost religiously) for work. (She's a rural vet.)

V8mate

45,899 posts

190 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
OpulentBob said:
Mrs OB is the same. She's got about 6 pairs of uggs and they take loads of abuse. She even wears them daily (almost religiously) for work. (She's a rural vet.)
I thought she's a lawyer?

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
V8mate said:
OpulentBob said:
Mrs OB is the same. She's got about 6 pairs of uggs and they take loads of abuse. She even wears them daily (almost religiously) for work. (She's a rural vet.)
I thought she's a lawyer?
Ex-Mrs OB is. Annoyingly.

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
alorotom said:
... and still look fine..
They don't, they look absolutely st. Like tucked in shell-suits, white sports socks with Brantano loafers, they are an obvious sign of a chav. Someone who would quite happily take their kids (by three different dads) to Tesco in an un-taxed and utterly wrecked Zafira, to buy them their Dairylea lunchables, and an extra packet of crisps ('because'), all the while dressed in PJs and Uggs.

Because, well, they're comfortable.

No.

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED