Astonishing Facts....

Astonishing Facts....

Author
Discussion

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

256 months

Tuesday 12th June 2018
quotequote all
FWIW the perforated satellite dishes make very little difference to wind resistance (especially at high wind speeds) since the holes are too small on dishes designed for the ku band. Its for cosmetic reasons mainly, because they pass light through they blend better into the surface they are mounted on compared to solid.

227bhp

10,203 posts

129 months

Tuesday 12th June 2018
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
FWIW the perforated satellite dishes make very little difference to wind resistance (especially at high wind speeds) since the holes are too small on dishes designed for the ku band. Its for cosmetic reasons mainly, because they pass light through they blend better into the surface they are mounted on compared to solid.
I would disagree as it doesn't exactly make them difficult to spot, not even vaguely does it succeed. It's a combination of things including wind resistance, but also weight and money saving.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

256 months

Wednesday 13th June 2018
quotequote all
227bhp said:
I would disagree as it doesn't exactly make them difficult to spot, not even vaguely does it succeed. It's a combination of things including wind resistance, but also weight and money saving.
I didn't say it camouflaged them, they just look a little less garish. Wind resistance is a non starter, in fact a perforated dish is likely to get damaged before a solid one in high winds. The (very) old mesh dishes had low wind resistance, but they are for C band and they were a bit lossy anyway.

Frimley111R

15,709 posts

235 months

Wednesday 13th June 2018
quotequote all
I always though perogative was spelt like this but apparently ... https://brians.wsu.edu/2016/05/30/perogative-prero...

davhill

5,263 posts

185 months

Wednesday 13th June 2018
quotequote all
Frimley111R said:
I always though perogative was spelt like this but apparently ... https://brians.wsu.edu/2016/05/30/perogative-prero...
Your prerogative but it's dangerously close to perjorative . Just saying.

glazbagun

14,294 posts

198 months

Wednesday 13th June 2018
quotequote all
Frimley111R said:
I always though perogative was spelt like this but apparently ... https://brians.wsu.edu/2016/05/30/perogative-prero...
Me too. That makes me guilty of almost the same crime as people who think "would've" is a contraction of "would of".

227bhp

10,203 posts

129 months

Wednesday 13th June 2018
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
227bhp said:
I would disagree as it doesn't exactly make them difficult to spot, not even vaguely does it succeed. It's a combination of things including wind resistance, but also weight and money saving.
I didn't say it camouflaged them, they just look a little less garish. Wind resistance is a non starter, in fact a perforated dish is likely to get damaged before a solid one in high winds. The (very) old mesh dishes had low wind resistance, but they are for C band and they were a bit lossy anyway.
I'm finding it hard to understand how something which has (say) 40% of its surface area missing isn't significantly effected by the wind hitting it.

toasty

7,510 posts

221 months

Wednesday 13th June 2018
quotequote all
Frimley111R said:
I always though perogative was spelt like this but apparently ... https://brians.wsu.edu/2016/05/30/perogative-prero...
I lost a £10 bet back in 1987 on this spelling. Still annoyed at my ignorance to this day.

mattyn1

5,819 posts

156 months

Wednesday 13th June 2018
quotequote all
Frimley111R said:
I always though perogative was spelt like this but apparently ... https://brians.wsu.edu/2016/05/30/perogative-prero...
Well I will go to the foot of my stairs! Unbelievable.

Halmyre

11,255 posts

140 months

Wednesday 13th June 2018
quotequote all
GOG440 said:
Frimley111R said:
Mr2Mike said:
I dont recall giving that information, though they did ask about any eye injuries that may have left metal inside the eye...
Me neither, the only thing they have to consider is if the patient is too fat to go into one as they are very tight for space inside.
very belated reply, but it is on every screening form i have seen in the 18 years I have been doing MRI.
There are weight limits for the scanners but we tend to run out of space well before the limit.
The reason we ask about metal in your eyes is that unlike most other bits of your body your eyes dont develop the scar tissue that would hold the metal fragment in place, you really dont want a piece of metal ricocheting around your eyeball at 40mph
I remember an episode of Messiah where someone is in an MRI machine with a shard of metal in their eye. Bleaargh.

gothatway

5,783 posts

171 months

Wednesday 13th June 2018
quotequote all
davhill said:
Your prerogative but it's dangerously close to perjorative . Just saying.
Dangerously close to what ? Just sayin'

davhill

5,263 posts

185 months

Wednesday 13th June 2018
quotequote all
gothatway said:
Dangerously close to what ? Just sayin'
To the offence of wilfully telling an untruth or making a misrepresentation under oath. Do keep up.

gothatway

5,783 posts

171 months

Thursday 14th June 2018
quotequote all
davhill said:
gothatway said:
Dangerously close to what ? Just sayin'
To the offence of wilfully telling an untruth or making a misrepresentation under oath. Do keep up.
Wouldn't that be perjurative, if there was such a word?

Moonhawk

10,730 posts

220 months

Thursday 14th June 2018
quotequote all
The gold in your wedding ring was formed many light years away and billions of years ago when a star went supernova.

In effect - you are wearing part of a dead star.

Dibble

12,940 posts

241 months

Thursday 14th June 2018
quotequote all
Moonhawk said:
The gold in your wedding ring was formed many light years away and billions of years ago when a star went supernova.

In effect - you are wearing part of a dead star.
No I’m not.

davhill

5,263 posts

185 months

Thursday 14th June 2018
quotequote all
gothatway said:
Wouldn't that be perjurative, if there was such a word?
Yep, because I quoted the definition of perjorative nerd

DocJock

8,363 posts

241 months

Thursday 14th June 2018
quotequote all
No, you really didn't...

Exige77

6,518 posts

192 months

Thursday 14th June 2018
quotequote all
Neil Chambers owns PistonHeads !!

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

256 months

Thursday 14th June 2018
quotequote all
227bhp said:
I'm finding it hard to understand how something which has (say) 40% of its surface area missing isn't significantly effected by the wind hitting it.
1) It's nowhere near 40%, much lower.
2) The holes are too small to flow any appreciable amount of air, even though there are many of them.



The dishes made from mesh do have much lower wind loading. However these only work at the low frequency band (C band) as the hole size is much larger, and even then they don't work very well compared to a solid dish.



Edited by Mr2Mike on Thursday 14th June 09:53

GroundEffect

13,855 posts

157 months

Thursday 14th June 2018
quotequote all
Moonhawk said:
The gold in your wedding ring was formed many light years away and billions of years ago when a star went supernova.

In effect - you are wearing part of a dead star.
Anything with a heavier atom than Iron is the same...so many parts of our bodies are the same too.