Things you always wanted to know the answer to [Vol. 4]

Things you always wanted to know the answer to [Vol. 4]

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Clockwork Cupcake

74,615 posts

273 months

Saturday 11th May 2019
quotequote all
handpaper said:
Two on the bottom, one on the top = therefore
One on the bottom, two on the top = because
Good correction - I'd forgotten about that. thumbup

The Vambo

6,648 posts

142 months

Saturday 11th May 2019
quotequote all
glazbagun said:
Why do we have an "&" symbol for "and" but not one for the common "the".
We sort of do but its no longer in use, þe is Old English for "the" with þ (thorn) pronounced as th.

Its why Ye olde was always pronounced the old and Ye is a modern mistake.

Frimley111R

15,677 posts

235 months

Monday 13th May 2019
quotequote all
I see things about mirrored no claim bonus. What is this? I just insure my cars by telling them how much NCB I have. Have I been doing this wrong forever? Can you only use one NCB on one car?

Clockwork Cupcake

74,615 posts

273 months

Monday 13th May 2019
quotequote all
Frimley111R said:
I see things about mirrored no claim bonus. What is this? I just insure my cars by telling them how much NCB I have. Have I been doing this wrong forever? Can you only use one NCB on one car?
Yes, you may only use one NCD per car. If it is "in use" on one car you cannot then use it on another.

However, what some insurers will do is to mirror it. This means they apply an introductory discount to a new policy equivalent to your NCD. After the first year without a claim, you then have a 2nd policy with that NCD so going forward you have two policies with two NCDs if you want to move insurers.

Conversely, if you start to use a multi-car policy, and you have more than one NCD, you run the risk of losing all but one as all but one will eventually expire.

I think you can have a NCD lie fallow for a couple of years before it expires. But it will expire - as my dad once found out to his cost.


Dr Doofenshmirtz

15,246 posts

201 months

Tuesday 14th May 2019
quotequote all
The Chinese and walking around with facemasks - why?
I mean, I highly doubt their ability to filter much in the way of small particles - so why do they wear them? If it just because fashion?

227bhp

10,203 posts

129 months

Tuesday 14th May 2019
quotequote all
Dr Doofenshmirtz said:
The Chinese and walking around with facemasks - why?
I mean, I highly doubt their ability to filter much in the way of small particles - so why do they wear them? If it just because fashion?
Fashion laugh
It's to filter airborne pollution.

McVities

354 posts

199 months

Wednesday 15th May 2019
quotequote all
Dr Doofenshmirtz said:
The Chinese and walking around with facemasks - why?
I mean, I highly doubt their ability to filter much in the way of small particles - so why do they wear them? If it just because fashion?
It's a common courtesy thing in the far East.
People who have colds wear the masks to prevent or help reduce the chance of them passing it on to others.

bigpriest

1,606 posts

131 months

Wednesday 15th May 2019
quotequote all
McVities said:
It's a common courtesy thing in the far East.
People who have colds wear the masks to prevent or help reduce the chance of them passing it on to others.
I thought they loved a good spit whenever they could?

glazbagun

14,282 posts

198 months

Wednesday 15th May 2019
quotequote all
I thought it was more of a Japanese thing, though the Chinese had a large SARS outbreak and a big bird flu scare, so I could see the fashion spreading.

glazbagun

14,282 posts

198 months

Wednesday 15th May 2019
quotequote all
The Vambo said:
glazbagun said:
Why do we have an "&" symbol for "and" but not one for the common "the".
We sort of do but its no longer in use, þe is Old English for "the" with þ (thorn) pronounced as th.

Its why Ye olde was always pronounced the old and Ye is a modern mistake.
So Ye Olde should really be pronounced The Old and our ancestral grammar nazis all hate us? laugh

john2443

6,341 posts

212 months

Wednesday 15th May 2019
quotequote all
glazbagun said:
Why do we have an "&" symbol for "and" but not one for the common "the".
In t'north they do smile

simoid

19,772 posts

159 months

Wednesday 15th May 2019
quotequote all
john2443 said:
glazbagun said:
Why do we have an "&" symbol for "and" but not one for the common "the".
In t'north they do smile
I always assumed that & was a sort of stylised “et” from French/Latin.

Clockwork Cupcake

74,615 posts

273 months

Wednesday 15th May 2019
quotequote all
simoid said:
I always assumed that & was a sort of stylised “et” from French/Latin.
Actually, now you mention it, I have seen "etc." written as &c in the past. scratchchin

jdw100

4,126 posts

165 months

Wednesday 15th May 2019
quotequote all
McVities said:
Dr Doofenshmirtz said:
The Chinese and walking around with facemasks - why?
I mean, I highly doubt their ability to filter much in the way of small particles - so why do they wear them? If it just because fashion?
It's a common courtesy thing in the far East.
People who have colds wear the masks to prevent or help reduce the chance of them passing it on to others.
Japanese women also use them when they are having a day without make up or when they don't want to be hassled.

It was originally for if you were ill but has now moved beyond this into a fashion thing along with other uses, such as above.


Blib

44,203 posts

198 months

Wednesday 15th May 2019
quotequote all
Specifically produced masks are also worn as an anti-hayfever measure.

Shakermaker

11,317 posts

101 months

Wednesday 15th May 2019
quotequote all
I’m not really a betting man, and whilst I understand the process and concept for betting on sports, or outcomes of votes etc, I don’t understand how people can bet on the outcome of Game of Thrones finale?

In that, apparently you can bet with odds of 1000/1 on a certain character being on the throne at the end, or 4/1 on another.

But since the TV show has already been filmed and produced, many must already know the outcome of the show, how is that something that can be bet upon where those in the know would be able to do so? Do they just have to be trusted not to, or do the bookmakers do extensive background checks on who is claiming the win?

SpeckledJim

31,608 posts

254 months

Wednesday 15th May 2019
quotequote all
Shakermaker said:
I’m not really a betting man, and whilst I understand the process and concept for betting on sports, or outcomes of votes etc, I don’t understand how people can bet on the outcome of Game of Thrones finale?

In that, apparently you can bet with odds of 1000/1 on a certain character being on the throne at the end, or 4/1 on another.

But since the TV show has already been filmed and produced, many must already know the outcome of the show, how is that something that can be bet upon where those in the know would be able to do so? Do they just have to be trusted not to, or do the bookmakers do extensive background checks on who is claiming the win?
As long as 90% don't know and get it wrong, the bookies perhaps don't care if 10% do know and get it right.

I expect the bookie doesn't open a book on something like this without quietly knowing the actual answer, and so being able to set their prices accordingly.


Clockwork Cupcake

74,615 posts

273 months

Wednesday 15th May 2019
quotequote all
Shakermaker said:
I’m not really a betting man, and whilst I understand the process and concept for betting on sports, or outcomes of votes etc, I don’t understand how people can bet on the outcome of Game of Thrones finale?

In that, apparently you can bet with odds of 1000/1 on a certain character being on the throne at the end, or 4/1 on another.

But since the TV show has already been filmed and produced, many must already know the outcome of the show, how is that something that can be bet upon where those in the know would be able to do so? Do they just have to be trusted not to, or do the bookmakers do extensive background checks on who is claiming the win?
I get where are you are coming from. You can bet on anything so long as the outcome isn't known, but in this case the outcome is known.

Having said that, I believe that several endings have been filmed and even the cast don't know which one is going to be used. So the outcome is probably a closely-guarded secret.

Liokault

2,837 posts

215 months

Wednesday 15th May 2019
quotequote all
McVities said:
Dr Doofenshmirtz said:
The Chinese and walking around with facemasks - why?
I mean, I highly doubt their ability to filter much in the way of small particles - so why do they wear them? If it just because fashion?
It's a common courtesy thing in the far East.
People who have colds wear the masks to prevent or help reduce the chance of them passing it on to others.
I'm not sure if the courtesy thing is correct. Just spent two weeks in Ho Chi Minh city, about 25% of people were wearing masks, the other 75% will and do happily clear their throat and spit at your feet.

I think its a pollution thing. I also wonder if there is a link to the rise in face recognition and face mask use?

SirLurker

20 posts

201 months

Wednesday 15th May 2019
quotequote all
Clockwork Cupcake said:
Shakermaker said:
I’m not really a betting man, and whilst I understand the process and concept for betting on sports, or outcomes of votes etc, I don’t understand how people can bet on the outcome of Game of Thrones finale?

In that, apparently you can bet with odds of 1000/1 on a certain character being on the throne at the end, or 4/1 on another.

But since the TV show has already been filmed and produced, many must already know the outcome of the show, how is that something that can be bet upon where those in the know would be able to do so? Do they just have to be trusted not to, or do the bookmakers do extensive background checks on who is claiming the win?
I get where are you are coming from. You can bet on anything so long as the outcome isn't known, but in this case the outcome is known.

Having said that, I believe that several endings have been filmed and even the cast don't know which one is going to be used. So the outcome is probably a closely-guarded secret.
Novelty market usually are a customer acquisition cost to the bookmaker; attracting non sporting punters who can be cross sold into casino. Also generating column inches generating above the line marketing. Typically, you won't be able to get serious money on. UK gambling commission look quite closely at these markets.

Typical 'Cost per acquisitions' for a betting customer are well over £100 so these novelty and price boost markets are seen as good value.

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED