Things that annoy you beyond reason...(Vol. 6)

Things that annoy you beyond reason...(Vol. 6)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

SlimJim16v

5,686 posts

144 months

Thursday 27th February 2020
quotequote all
Europa1 said:
Or "take a shower"?
Another Americanism I think.

No, please leave it where it is. We only have the one.

sospan

2,486 posts

223 months

Thursday 27th February 2020
quotequote all
Should of.....grrrrrr
In the car this pm listening to Steve Wright.
Interviewing a celeb of some kind, possibly a broadcaster too, and he was using “should of” instead of should have.
BBC standards indeed.

Cotty

39,587 posts

285 months

Thursday 27th February 2020
quotequote all
It annoys me when people pretend not to know things. "The prime minister, don't know who you are on about", "black and white dog, nope never heard of a dalmation before", "Iconic british sports car, let me look up Elise as I have never heard of it before", "Wetherspoons? are they a pub" etc etc. I don't know why they do it

My brother used to do it, one of the reasons I cut him out of my life, the other was he was a .

Frank7

6,619 posts

88 months

Thursday 27th February 2020
quotequote all
SlimJim16v said:
Europa1 said:
Or "take a shower"?
Another Americanism I think.

No, please leave it where it is. We only have the one.
I think it would only count if they said, “take THE shower.

sospan said:
Should of.....grrrrrr
In the car this pm listening to Steve Wright.
Interviewing a celeb of some kind, possibly a broadcaster too, and he was using “should of” instead of should have.
BBC standards indeed.
I often hear “should of”, when the person’s actually saying “should’ve.”

Morningside

24,111 posts

230 months

Thursday 27th February 2020
quotequote all
Going forward. I hear this far too many times in a day.


SlimJim16v

5,686 posts

144 months

Thursday 27th February 2020
quotequote all
Frank7 said:
I think it would only count if they said, “take THE shower.

I often hear “should of”, when the person’s actually saying “should’ve.”
Yes, you're correct on both.
I should've said, we only have one and you can't have it.
Anyone who uses of instead of have, is an ill educated dick.

Also, 99% of people who use the word literally, are using it incorrectly.

Frank7

6,619 posts

88 months

Thursday 27th February 2020
quotequote all
SlimJim16v said:
Anyone who uses of instead of have, is an ill educated dick.

Also, 99% of people who use the word literally, are using it incorrectly.
No argument from me Jim, my nephew recently said, “Richie’s speech, the best man at my wedding was so funny, that I literally pi$$ed myself!”
I said, “I was at your wedding Dan, and I don’t think that you did.”

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 27th February 2020
quotequote all
For once, Frank, I'm right with you.

Another - 'brought' instead of 'bought'. How did that become common parlance?

"What do you think of my new top, I only brought it today? Not sure I like it, I may take it back on the weekend".

Double whammy shoot

Frank7

6,619 posts

88 months

Thursday 27th February 2020
quotequote all
had ham said:
For once, Frank, I'm right with you.

Another - 'brought' instead of 'bought'. How did that become common parlance?

"What do you think of my new top, I only brought it today? Not sure I like it, I may take it back on the weekend".

Double whammy shoot
Thanks for being with me had ham, even it’s only for once.
Here’s another that winds me up, “I got done for driving with undue care and attention.”
I said to a work colleague, “So you were done for driving more carefully than you should?”
It fell on stony ground.

The Mad Monk

10,474 posts

118 months

Thursday 27th February 2020
quotequote all
Frank7 said:
No argument from me Jim, my nephew recently said, “Richie’s speech, the best man at my wedding was so funny, that I literally pi$$ed myself!”
I said, “I was at your wedding Dan, and I don’t think that you did.”
What did Dan say to that?

Clockwork Cupcake

74,615 posts

273 months

Thursday 27th February 2020
quotequote all
Frank7 said:
No argument from me Jim, my nephew recently said, “Richie’s speech, the best man at my wedding was so funny, that I literally pi$$ed myself!”
I said, “I was at your wedding Dan, and I don’t think that you did.”
I literally could care less.

(Note: Because I care a little bit)

Frank7

6,619 posts

88 months

Thursday 27th February 2020
quotequote all
The Mad Monk said:
Frank7 said:
No argument from me Jim, my nephew recently said, “Richie’s speech, the best man at my wedding was so funny, that I literally pi$$ed myself!”
I said, “I was at your wedding Dan, and I don’t think that you did.”
What did Dan say to that?
Nothing, he couldn’t see that I meant that he hadn’t literally pi$$ed himself.

Alucidnation

16,810 posts

171 months

Friday 28th February 2020
quotequote all
fking Amazon Music ad with fking Lewis fking Capaldi.


fk OFF!!!!

paua

5,767 posts

144 months

Friday 28th February 2020
quotequote all
[redacted]

DocJock

8,360 posts

241 months

Friday 28th February 2020
quotequote all
Frank7 said:
The Mad Monk said:
Frank7 said:
No argument from me Jim, my nephew recently said, “Richie’s speech, the best man at my wedding was so funny, that I literally pi$$ed myself!”
I said, “I was at your wedding Dan, and I don’t think that you did.”
What did Dan say to that?
Nothing, he couldn’t see that I meant that he hadn’t literally pi$$ed himself.
He was probably thinking "Does this auld fella not realise we aren't living in the '60s any longer and that the English language has evolved to include 'pissed myself' meaning laughing uncontrollably?".

The Mad Monk

10,474 posts

118 months

Friday 28th February 2020
quotequote all
DocJock said:
He was probably thinking "Does this auld fella not realise we aren't living in the '60s any longer and that the English language has evolved to include 'pissed myself' meaning laughing uncontrollably?".
Good point. Well made.

However when the word "literally" is added, that changes the sense and meaning of the sentence, doesn't it?

If not, what purpose does the word "literally" serve?

talksthetorque

10,815 posts

136 months

Friday 28th February 2020
quotequote all
The Mad Monk said:
DocJock said:
He was probably thinking "Does this auld fella not realise we aren't living in the '60s any longer and that the English language has evolved to include 'pissed myself' meaning laughing uncontrollably?".
Good point. Well made.

However when the word "literally" is added, that changes the sense and meaning of the sentence, doesn't it?

If not, what purpose does the word "literally" serve?
Its literally just used for emphasis.

popeyewhite

19,974 posts

121 months

Friday 28th February 2020
quotequote all
talksthetorque said:
The Mad Monk said:
DocJock said:
He was probably thinking "Does this auld fella not realise we aren't living in the '60s any longer and that the English language has evolved to include 'pissed myself' meaning laughing uncontrollably?".
Good point. Well made.

However when the word "literally" is added, that changes the sense and meaning of the sentence, doesn't it?

If not, what purpose does the word "literally" serve?
Its literally just used for emphasis.
We did the 'literally' thing a few weeks back. Some dictionaries seeking credibility now accept the lazy misuse of English/slang as 'evolution of language'. Which it isn't. Hence, entirely incorrectly in my view, 'literally' may be used by some for emphasis. If the user has missed an education.

bigpriest

1,606 posts

131 months

Friday 28th February 2020
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
talksthetorque said:
The Mad Monk said:
DocJock said:
He was probably thinking "Does this auld fella not realise we aren't living in the '60s any longer and that the English language has evolved to include 'pissed myself' meaning laughing uncontrollably?".
Good point. Well made.

However when the word "literally" is added, that changes the sense and meaning of the sentence, doesn't it?

If not, what purpose does the word "literally" serve?
Its literally just used for emphasis.
We did the 'literally' thing a few weeks back. Some dictionaries seeking credibility now accept the lazy misuse of English/slang as 'evolution of language'. Which it isn't. Hence, entirely incorrectly in my view, 'literally' may be used by some for emphasis. If the user has missed an education.
And we know it's based on poor education and ignorance - we have the words 'amost' and 'nearly' that work perfectly in that sentence. The story would have been funnier if he had actually pissed himself.

talksthetorque

10,815 posts

136 months

Friday 28th February 2020
quotequote all
bigpriest said:
popeyewhite said:
talksthetorque said:
The Mad Monk said:
DocJock said:
He was probably thinking "Does this auld fella not realise we aren't living in the '60s any longer and that the English language has evolved to include 'pissed myself' meaning laughing uncontrollably?".
Good point. Well made.

However when the word "literally" is added, that changes the sense and meaning of the sentence, doesn't it?

If not, what purpose does the word "literally" serve?
Its literally just used for emphasis.
We did the 'literally' thing a few weeks back. Some dictionaries seeking credibility now accept the lazy misuse of English/slang as 'evolution of language'. Which it isn't. Hence, entirely incorrectly in my view, 'literally' may be used by some for emphasis. If the user has missed an education.
And we know it's based on poor education and ignorance - we have the words 'amost' and 'nearly' that work perfectly in that sentence. The story would have been funnier if he had actually pissed himself.
I don't think it is owen to poor education, just that it's fashionable to say. I'm sure most of the users know it's definition, but some will accept and adopt the new usage and some will refuse. See also sick - wicked - cool etc.

I also agree the story would have been funnier, but would point out that the wedding may have been viewed as slightly less of a success.

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED