What are your unpopular opinions? (Vol. 2)

What are your unpopular opinions? (Vol. 2)

Author
Discussion

Dark85

665 posts

149 months

Monday 8th April
quotequote all
valiant said:
Nope. Just light rail and metros.

At the moment NR is playing around with moving block signalling (sort of a precursor but still miles off driverless) and that alone will cost hundreds of billions to install network wide especially when you think that some parts of our network still rely on semaphore signalling.

No, driverless trains are for the birds and only brought up by Daily Mail enthusiasts who knows nothing about the railway except what Lord Rothermere tells them.

And it's not the TOCs really whose holding up negotiations but the DfT. The TOCs want to settle but the government prefers not to. ASLEF has also made itself available for talks for the past year but noone form the DfT has come forward.

Oh, and the DLR has a member of staff aboard every single train. No staff - no service. ORR condition.

Edited by valiant on Monday 8th April 11:01
Hehe, I thought being deliberately vague would get a good reaction - my apologies.

I am generally very supportive of unions and think the right to strike - along with other forms of collective action - are crucial for a fair society and if anything aren't used enough. I think the vitriol directed at the those partaking in industrial action is probably highly amusing to the powerful, pitting the workers against other workers has always been a favourite sport.

I also think trying to do away with guards and station staff is a huge mistake and should be fought at both industrial and consumer levels. Certainly for customers, this should be a far higher priority than drivers as their role seems far less replaceable but, from a technology standpoint, I really can't see why driverless is such a difficult thing to achieve? What am I missing?





Pit Pony

8,689 posts

122 months

Monday 8th April
quotequote all
Dark85 said:
Unpopular opinion. We should be moving towards a rail network without drivers.
The irony is that we have more self driving cars on the roads than automatic trains.

Trains being actually very easy to automate.

2xChevrons

3,248 posts

81 months

Monday 8th April
quotequote all
Pit Pony said:
The irony is that we have more self driving cars on the roads than automatic trains.

Trains being actually very easy to automate.
Trains may be very easy to automate, but railways most definitely are not.

e-honda

8,933 posts

147 months

Monday 8th April
quotequote all
2xChevrons said:
Trains may be very easy to automate, but railways most definitely are not.
What does that mean?
Vast amounts of railway switching and signalling that was once manual has already been automated.

Blown2CV

28,919 posts

204 months

Monday 8th April
quotequote all
e-honda said:
2xChevrons said:
Trains may be very easy to automate, but railways most definitely are not.
What does that mean?
Vast amounts of railway switching and signalling that was once manual has already been automated.
it's not the tech that is the issue - it's the passengers.

I don't think most members of the public, if they really were honest, are ready for totally automated high speed trains. We're still obsessed with the idea that we have to have a 'conductor' to speak to if things go wrong. It's a comfort thing.

AstonZagato

12,725 posts

211 months

Monday 8th April
quotequote all
Blown2CV said:
it's not the tech that is the issue - it's the passengers.

I don't think most members of the public, if they really were honest, are ready for totally automated high speed trains. We're still obsessed with the idea that we have to have a 'conductor' to speak to if things go wrong. It's a comfort thing.
I commuted for 25 years on a mainline train with no conductor. It didn't bother me in the slightest. There was no way to talk to anyone other than pulling the emergency cord. The single occasion (out of over 10,000 journeys) that I recall this happening, we hadn't even left the terminus and it was the station staff that dealt with it.

It never caused me any disquiet nor did it the other passengers, as far as I could see. certainly the trains were rammed to the gills, so they weren't voting with their feet.

Kuwahara

856 posts

19 months

Monday 8th April
quotequote all
Strangely Brown said:
Not that unpopular. I support Israel and I think Netanyahu should refuse to negotiate anything until all of the remaining hostages are released. Then, and only then, should any talks take place. Hostages first. Talk second.
Yeh because he’s a nice guy and the indiscriminate killing would stop….its Israel they do what the fk they want…

Blown2CV

28,919 posts

204 months

Monday 8th April
quotequote all
AstonZagato said:
Blown2CV said:
it's not the tech that is the issue - it's the passengers.

I don't think most members of the public, if they really were honest, are ready for totally automated high speed trains. We're still obsessed with the idea that we have to have a 'conductor' to speak to if things go wrong. It's a comfort thing.
I commuted for 25 years on a mainline train with no conductor. It didn't bother me in the slightest. There was no way to talk to anyone other than pulling the emergency cord. The single occasion (out of over 10,000 journeys) that I recall this happening, we hadn't even left the terminus and it was the station staff that dealt with it.

It never caused me any disquiet nor did it the other passengers, as far as I could see. certainly the trains were rammed to the gills, so they weren't voting with their feet.
but you're just one person, not the public at large. Also the media swoops down on things like this and you can be sure they'd present fully automated trains using all the risks they can think of.

President Merkin

3,121 posts

20 months

Monday 8th April
quotequote all
And we were discussing trains without drivers, not guards.

AstonZagato

12,725 posts

211 months

Monday 8th April
quotequote all
President Merkin said:
And we were discussing trains without drivers, not guards.
You may have been but Blown2CV wasn't.
Blown2CV said:
it's not the tech that is the issue - it's the passengers.

I don't think most members of the public, if they really were honest, are ready for totally automated high speed trains. We're still obsessed with the idea that we have to have a 'conductor' to speak to if things go wrong. It's a comfort thing.

DodgyGeezer

40,601 posts

191 months

Monday 8th April
quotequote all
Kuwahara said:
Strangely Brown said:
Not that unpopular. I support Israel and I think Netanyahu should refuse to negotiate anything until all of the remaining hostages are released. Then, and only then, should any talks take place. Hostages first. Talk second.
Yeh because he’s a nice guy and the indiscriminate killing would stop….its Israel they do what the fk they want…
Bibi may well be a shyster - but I'd take him every day of the week (and twice on Sunday) over the murderous fkwits of hamas (hezbollah and Iran options are also available)

AstonZagato

12,725 posts

211 months

Monday 8th April
quotequote all
Blown2CV said:
AstonZagato said:
Blown2CV said:
it's not the tech that is the issue - it's the passengers.

I don't think most members of the public, if they really were honest, are ready for totally automated high speed trains. We're still obsessed with the idea that we have to have a 'conductor' to speak to if things go wrong. It's a comfort thing.
I commuted for 25 years on a mainline train with no conductor. It didn't bother me in the slightest. There was no way to talk to anyone other than pulling the emergency cord. The single occasion (out of over 10,000 journeys) that I recall this happening, we hadn't even left the terminus and it was the station staff that dealt with it.

It never caused me any disquiet nor did it the other passengers, as far as I could see. certainly the trains were rammed to the gills, so they weren't voting with their feet.
but you're just one person, not the public at large. Also the media swoops down on things like this and you can be sure they'd present fully automated trains using all the risks they can think of.
Well, right back at you. Who is the we in "We're still obsessed with the idea that we have to have a 'conductor' to speak to if things go wrong. It's a comfort thing"

You are no more qualified to state than I am - except possibly that I have travelled hundreds of thousands of miles on trains with no 'conductor', alongside many tens of thousands of people who never raised this as an issue in my earshot over 25 years. I heard many, many complaints about punctuality, reliability, cleanliness, timetable changes, drivers' strikes, etc. over the years (though most of the time people just suffered in silence). In my wide sample, there was never a time when people compained that there was no conductor on the train or that they felt unsafe.

President Merkin

3,121 posts

20 months

Monday 8th April
quotequote all
AstonZagato said:
You may have been but Blown2CV wasn't.
I think you have misunderstood what B2CV was saying...

Jonathan27

696 posts

165 months

Monday 8th April
quotequote all
Strangely Brown said:
DodgyGeezer said:
unpopular opinions?

I support Israel (though Netanyahu needs to be gone)
Not that unpopular. I support Israel and I think Netanyahu should refuse to negotiate anything until all of the remaining hostages are released. Then, and only then, should any talks take place. Hostages first. Talk second.

Actually I think it is, and certainly should be, a very unpopular opinion.

captain_cynic

12,109 posts

96 months

Monday 8th April
quotequote all
Strangely Brown said:
DodgyGeezer said:
unpopular opinions?

I support Israel (though Netanyahu needs to be gone)
Not that unpopular. I support Israel and I think Netanyahu should refuse to negotiate anything until all of the remaining hostages are released. Then, and only then, should any talks take place. Hostages first. Talk second.
Indeed, it isn't an unpopular opinion. It's just that the Hamas apologists are trying to aplify theirs into making people believe it's popular.

However I think the sad fact is there will be few, if any hostages left alive.

AstonZagato

12,725 posts

211 months

Monday 8th April
quotequote all
President Merkin said:
AstonZagato said:
You may have been but Blown2CV wasn't.
I think you have misunderstood what B2CV was saying...
In train terms, 'conductor' ≠ 'driver'. A conductor is in charge of passengers, seat allocation, ticket collection, doors, etc. The only thing the conductor is not in charge of is driving.

otolith

56,313 posts

205 months

Monday 8th April
quotequote all
valiant said:
Oh, and the DLR has a member of staff aboard every single train. No staff - no service. ORR condition.
Next generation will have a member of staff and a dog. Employee is there to feed the dog, dog is there to bite the employee if he tries to touch anything.

Mr Penguin

1,277 posts

40 months

Monday 8th April
quotequote all
Jonathan27 said:

Actually I think it is, and certainly should be, a very unpopular opinion.
What do you think they should do?

Randy Winkman

16,233 posts

190 months

Tuesday 9th April
quotequote all
captain_cynic said:
Strangely Brown said:
DodgyGeezer said:
unpopular opinions?

I support Israel (though Netanyahu needs to be gone)
Not that unpopular. I support Israel and I think Netanyahu should refuse to negotiate anything until all of the remaining hostages are released. Then, and only then, should any talks take place. Hostages first. Talk second.
Indeed, it isn't an unpopular opinion. It's just that the Hamas apologists are trying to aplify theirs into making people believe it's popular.

However I think the sad fact is there will be few, if any hostages left alive.
Do either of you think there is any limit to how many Palestinian civilians should be killed before hostages are released?

Strangely Brown

10,102 posts

232 months

Tuesday 9th April
quotequote all
Randy Winkman said:
captain_cynic said:
Strangely Brown said:
DodgyGeezer said:
unpopular opinions?

I support Israel (though Netanyahu needs to be gone)
Not that unpopular. I support Israel and I think Netanyahu should refuse to negotiate anything until all of the remaining hostages are released. Then, and only then, should any talks take place. Hostages first. Talk second.
Indeed, it isn't an unpopular opinion. It's just that the Hamas apologists are trying to aplify theirs into making people believe it's popular.

However I think the sad fact is there will be few, if any hostages left alive.
Do either of you think there is any limit to how many Palestinian civilians should be killed before hostages are released?
Maybe you should put that question to the Hamas leadership.