Match.com (Vol. 7)
Discussion
Plate spinner said:
Loads of Victorian blokes on here that believe women should be coy and demure in the mating game, exposing a bit of ankle here, hint of décolletage there etc. Women choosing to openly express their sexual desires, being comfortable with their bodies (jeez, we’re all walking around naked under our clothes FFS) and being horny for potentially uncomplicated sex makes them mental / sluts / to be run away from apparently.
Plenty of women have superb daily lives - all the basics in check; successful careers, raising good kids, strong friends & family circles, well run home life etc. All they are missing is a good seeing to, which is a basic human desire and bloody good fun if with the right company!
A lot don’t even want to be in a proper relationship with a man because they simply don’t need it / don’t have the time / have had their fingers burnt in the past / whatever - a lot of guys read this as ‘she has issues’...
But every other weekend when without their kids they want to indulge and express a side of them that has no other outlet. Some people are just more highly sexed than others.
Anyone who doesn’t get this or believes that other guys are making this s
t up is living in the dark ages, is terrified of the thought of it or has had very little experience with women in the modern era.
As a bloke if that’s not what you’re looking for because you’re actively looking for a GF / wife then fair enough, it’s a thanks but no thanks and on you go. But to be derogatory towards such a woman is pretty infantile and short sighted IMHO.
Y’know how acceptable it is for blokes to look at a physically attractive woman and think “I would” without even considering a relationship with her... well surprisingly women look at some men and think exactly the same. The apps on the phones we are so intimate with now give a discreet / intimate medium to explore those thoughts.
Just my opinion
The reality is though that women, rightly or wrongly, should retain a little mystery. Again, rightly or wrongly, texting pictures of her knockers and kebab isn't going to gain her much respect. If she's just wanting to get laid then fine, but that's the truth, as much of a double-standard as it is. Plenty of women have superb daily lives - all the basics in check; successful careers, raising good kids, strong friends & family circles, well run home life etc. All they are missing is a good seeing to, which is a basic human desire and bloody good fun if with the right company!
A lot don’t even want to be in a proper relationship with a man because they simply don’t need it / don’t have the time / have had their fingers burnt in the past / whatever - a lot of guys read this as ‘she has issues’...
But every other weekend when without their kids they want to indulge and express a side of them that has no other outlet. Some people are just more highly sexed than others.
Anyone who doesn’t get this or believes that other guys are making this s
t up is living in the dark ages, is terrified of the thought of it or has had very little experience with women in the modern era.As a bloke if that’s not what you’re looking for because you’re actively looking for a GF / wife then fair enough, it’s a thanks but no thanks and on you go. But to be derogatory towards such a woman is pretty infantile and short sighted IMHO.
Y’know how acceptable it is for blokes to look at a physically attractive woman and think “I would” without even considering a relationship with her... well surprisingly women look at some men and think exactly the same. The apps on the phones we are so intimate with now give a discreet / intimate medium to explore those thoughts.
Just my opinion
Fermit and Sexy Sarah said:
Plate spinner said:
Loads of Victorian blokes on here that believe women should be coy and demure in the mating game, exposing a bit of ankle here, hint of décolletage there etc. Women choosing to openly express their sexual desires, being comfortable with their bodies (jeez, we’re all walking around naked under our clothes FFS) and being horny for potentially uncomplicated sex makes them mental / sluts / to be run away from apparently.
Plenty of women have superb daily lives - all the basics in check; successful careers, raising good kids, strong friends & family circles, well run home life etc. All they are missing is a good seeing to, which is a basic human desire and bloody good fun if with the right company!
A lot don’t even want to be in a proper relationship with a man because they simply don’t need it / don’t have the time / have had their fingers burnt in the past / whatever - a lot of guys read this as ‘she has issues’...
But every other weekend when without their kids they want to indulge and express a side of them that has no other outlet. Some people are just more highly sexed than others.
Anyone who doesn’t get this or believes that other guys are making this st up is living in the dark ages, is terrified of the thought of it or has had very little experience with women in the modern era.
As a bloke if that’s not what you’re looking for because you’re actively looking for a GF / wife then fair enough, it’s a thanks but no thanks and on you go. But to be derogatory towards such a woman is pretty infantile and short sighted IMHO.
Y’know how acceptable it is for blokes to look at a physically attractive woman and think “I would” without even considering a relationship with her... well surprisingly women look at some men and think exactly the same. The apps on the phones we are so intimate with now give a discreet / intimate medium to explore those thoughts.
Just my opinion
The reality is though that women, rightly or wrongly, should retain a little mystery. Again, rightly or wrongly, texting pictures of her knockers and kebab isn't going to gain her much respect. If she's just wanting to get laid then fine, but that's the truth, as much of a double-standard as it is. Plenty of women have superb daily lives - all the basics in check; successful careers, raising good kids, strong friends & family circles, well run home life etc. All they are missing is a good seeing to, which is a basic human desire and bloody good fun if with the right company!
A lot don’t even want to be in a proper relationship with a man because they simply don’t need it / don’t have the time / have had their fingers burnt in the past / whatever - a lot of guys read this as ‘she has issues’...
But every other weekend when without their kids they want to indulge and express a side of them that has no other outlet. Some people are just more highly sexed than others.
Anyone who doesn’t get this or believes that other guys are making this s
t up is living in the dark ages, is terrified of the thought of it or has had very little experience with women in the modern era.As a bloke if that’s not what you’re looking for because you’re actively looking for a GF / wife then fair enough, it’s a thanks but no thanks and on you go. But to be derogatory towards such a woman is pretty infantile and short sighted IMHO.
Y’know how acceptable it is for blokes to look at a physically attractive woman and think “I would” without even considering a relationship with her... well surprisingly women look at some men and think exactly the same. The apps on the phones we are so intimate with now give a discreet / intimate medium to explore those thoughts.
Just my opinion
hyphen said:
yes, some women can be nympho's but most make guys work for it a little first. As said by others, mental health/confidence issues maybe at play and it may not be worth the resulting aggro.
Can't say I've had any aggro. In my case they tend to be 40ish, separated, couple of grown up kids, and after a marriage of humdrum open their eyes and minds to what's out there. The result being they will dive in quicker, experiment more, say no to less and catch up on 20 years of boredom. I think some get a kick out of doing things they refused to do with their husband for years. 
I suspect a few of the husbands are on here...
TwistingMyMelon said:
Fermit and Sexy Sarah said:
Plate spinner said:
Loads of Victorian blokes on here that believe women should be coy and demure in the mating game, exposing a bit of ankle here, hint of décolletage there etc. Women choosing to openly express their sexual desires, being comfortable with their bodies (jeez, we’re all walking around naked under our clothes FFS) and being horny for potentially uncomplicated sex makes them mental / sluts / to be run away from apparently.
Plenty of women have superb daily lives - all the basics in check; successful careers, raising good kids, strong friends & family circles, well run home life etc. All they are missing is a good seeing to, which is a basic human desire and bloody good fun if with the right company!
A lot don’t even want to be in a proper relationship with a man because they simply don’t need it / don’t have the time / have had their fingers burnt in the past / whatever - a lot of guys read this as ‘she has issues’...
But every other weekend when without their kids they want to indulge and express a side of them that has no other outlet. Some people are just more highly sexed than others.
Anyone who doesn’t get this or believes that other guys are making this st up is living in the dark ages, is terrified of the thought of it or has had very little experience with women in the modern era.
As a bloke if that’s not what you’re looking for because you’re actively looking for a GF / wife then fair enough, it’s a thanks but no thanks and on you go. But to be derogatory towards such a woman is pretty infantile and short sighted IMHO.
Y’know how acceptable it is for blokes to look at a physically attractive woman and think “I would” without even considering a relationship with her... well surprisingly women look at some men and think exactly the same. The apps on the phones we are so intimate with now give a discreet / intimate medium to explore those thoughts.
Just my opinion
The reality is though that women, rightly or wrongly, should retain a little mystery. Again, rightly or wrongly, texting pictures of her knockers and kebab isn't going to gain her much respect. If she's just wanting to get laid then fine, but that's the truth, as much of a double-standard as it is. Plenty of women have superb daily lives - all the basics in check; successful careers, raising good kids, strong friends & family circles, well run home life etc. All they are missing is a good seeing to, which is a basic human desire and bloody good fun if with the right company!
A lot don’t even want to be in a proper relationship with a man because they simply don’t need it / don’t have the time / have had their fingers burnt in the past / whatever - a lot of guys read this as ‘she has issues’...
But every other weekend when without their kids they want to indulge and express a side of them that has no other outlet. Some people are just more highly sexed than others.
Anyone who doesn’t get this or believes that other guys are making this s
t up is living in the dark ages, is terrified of the thought of it or has had very little experience with women in the modern era.As a bloke if that’s not what you’re looking for because you’re actively looking for a GF / wife then fair enough, it’s a thanks but no thanks and on you go. But to be derogatory towards such a woman is pretty infantile and short sighted IMHO.
Y’know how acceptable it is for blokes to look at a physically attractive woman and think “I would” without even considering a relationship with her... well surprisingly women look at some men and think exactly the same. The apps on the phones we are so intimate with now give a discreet / intimate medium to explore those thoughts.
Just my opinion
TwistingMyMelon said:
Fermit and Sexy Sarah said:
Plate spinner said:
Loads of Victorian blokes on here that believe women should be coy and demure in the mating game, exposing a bit of ankle here, hint of décolletage there etc. Women choosing to openly express their sexual desires, being comfortable with their bodies (jeez, we’re all walking around naked under our clothes FFS) and being horny for potentially uncomplicated sex makes them mental / sluts / to be run away from apparently.
Plenty of women have superb daily lives - all the basics in check; successful careers, raising good kids, strong friends & family circles, well run home life etc. All they are missing is a good seeing to, which is a basic human desire and bloody good fun if with the right company!
A lot don’t even want to be in a proper relationship with a man because they simply don’t need it / don’t have the time / have had their fingers burnt in the past / whatever - a lot of guys read this as ‘she has issues’...
But every other weekend when without their kids they want to indulge and express a side of them that has no other outlet. Some people are just more highly sexed than others.
Anyone who doesn’t get this or believes that other guys are making this st up is living in the dark ages, is terrified of the thought of it or has had very little experience with women in the modern era.
As a bloke if that’s not what you’re looking for because you’re actively looking for a GF / wife then fair enough, it’s a thanks but no thanks and on you go. But to be derogatory towards such a woman is pretty infantile and short sighted IMHO.
Y’know how acceptable it is for blokes to look at a physically attractive woman and think “I would” without even considering a relationship with her... well surprisingly women look at some men and think exactly the same. The apps on the phones we are so intimate with now give a discreet / intimate medium to explore those thoughts.
Just my opinion
The reality is though that women, rightly or wrongly, should retain a little mystery. Again, rightly or wrongly, texting pictures of her knockers and kebab isn't going to gain her much respect. If she's just wanting to get laid then fine, but that's the truth, as much of a double-standard as it is. Plenty of women have superb daily lives - all the basics in check; successful careers, raising good kids, strong friends & family circles, well run home life etc. All they are missing is a good seeing to, which is a basic human desire and bloody good fun if with the right company!
A lot don’t even want to be in a proper relationship with a man because they simply don’t need it / don’t have the time / have had their fingers burnt in the past / whatever - a lot of guys read this as ‘she has issues’...
But every other weekend when without their kids they want to indulge and express a side of them that has no other outlet. Some people are just more highly sexed than others.
Anyone who doesn’t get this or believes that other guys are making this s
t up is living in the dark ages, is terrified of the thought of it or has had very little experience with women in the modern era.As a bloke if that’s not what you’re looking for because you’re actively looking for a GF / wife then fair enough, it’s a thanks but no thanks and on you go. But to be derogatory towards such a woman is pretty infantile and short sighted IMHO.
Y’know how acceptable it is for blokes to look at a physically attractive woman and think “I would” without even considering a relationship with her... well surprisingly women look at some men and think exactly the same. The apps on the phones we are so intimate with now give a discreet / intimate medium to explore those thoughts.
Just my opinion
Fermit and Sexy Sarah said:
Plate spinner said:
Loads of Victorian blokes on here that believe women should be coy and demure in the mating game, exposing a bit of ankle here, hint of décolletage there etc. Women choosing to openly express their sexual desires, being comfortable with their bodies (jeez, we’re all walking around naked under our clothes FFS) and being horny for potentially uncomplicated sex makes them mental / sluts / to be run away from apparently.
Plenty of women have superb daily lives - all the basics in check; successful careers, raising good kids, strong friends & family circles, well run home life etc. All they are missing is a good seeing to, which is a basic human desire and bloody good fun if with the right company!
A lot don’t even want to be in a proper relationship with a man because they simply don’t need it / don’t have the time / have had their fingers burnt in the past / whatever - a lot of guys read this as ‘she has issues’...
But every other weekend when without their kids they want to indulge and express a side of them that has no other outlet. Some people are just more highly sexed than others.
Anyone who doesn’t get this or believes that other guys are making this st up is living in the dark ages, is terrified of the thought of it or has had very little experience with women in the modern era.
As a bloke if that’s not what you’re looking for because you’re actively looking for a GF / wife then fair enough, it’s a thanks but no thanks and on you go. But to be derogatory towards such a woman is pretty infantile and short sighted IMHO.
Y’know how acceptable it is for blokes to look at a physically attractive woman and think “I would” without even considering a relationship with her... well surprisingly women look at some men and think exactly the same. The apps on the phones we are so intimate with now give a discreet / intimate medium to explore those thoughts.
Just my opinion
The reality is though that women, rightly or wrongly, should retain a little mystery. Again, rightly or wrongly, texting pictures of her knockers and kebab isn't going to gain her much respect. If she's just wanting to get laid then fine, but that's the truth, as much of a double-standard as it is. Plenty of women have superb daily lives - all the basics in check; successful careers, raising good kids, strong friends & family circles, well run home life etc. All they are missing is a good seeing to, which is a basic human desire and bloody good fun if with the right company!
A lot don’t even want to be in a proper relationship with a man because they simply don’t need it / don’t have the time / have had their fingers burnt in the past / whatever - a lot of guys read this as ‘she has issues’...
But every other weekend when without their kids they want to indulge and express a side of them that has no other outlet. Some people are just more highly sexed than others.
Anyone who doesn’t get this or believes that other guys are making this s
t up is living in the dark ages, is terrified of the thought of it or has had very little experience with women in the modern era.As a bloke if that’s not what you’re looking for because you’re actively looking for a GF / wife then fair enough, it’s a thanks but no thanks and on you go. But to be derogatory towards such a woman is pretty infantile and short sighted IMHO.
Y’know how acceptable it is for blokes to look at a physically attractive woman and think “I would” without even considering a relationship with her... well surprisingly women look at some men and think exactly the same. The apps on the phones we are so intimate with now give a discreet / intimate medium to explore those thoughts.
Just my opinion
Which is fine. But it’s not ‘the truth’.
Fermit and Sexy Sarah said:
Plate spinner said:
Loads of Victorian blokes on here that believe women should be coy and demure in the mating game, exposing a bit of ankle here, hint of décolletage there etc. Women choosing to openly express their sexual desires, being comfortable with their bodies (jeez, we’re all walking around naked under our clothes FFS) and being horny for potentially uncomplicated sex makes them mental / sluts / to be run away from apparently.
Plenty of women have superb daily lives - all the basics in check; successful careers, raising good kids, strong friends & family circles, well run home life etc. All they are missing is a good seeing to, which is a basic human desire and bloody good fun if with the right company!
A lot don’t even want to be in a proper relationship with a man because they simply don’t need it / don’t have the time / have had their fingers burnt in the past / whatever - a lot of guys read this as ‘she has issues’...
But every other weekend when without their kids they want to indulge and express a side of them that has no other outlet. Some people are just more highly sexed than others.
Anyone who doesn’t get this or believes that other guys are making this st up is living in the dark ages, is terrified of the thought of it or has had very little experience with women in the modern era.
As a bloke if that’s not what you’re looking for because you’re actively looking for a GF / wife then fair enough, it’s a thanks but no thanks and on you go. But to be derogatory towards such a woman is pretty infantile and short sighted IMHO.
Y’know how acceptable it is for blokes to look at a physically attractive woman and think “I would” without even considering a relationship with her... well surprisingly women look at some men and think exactly the same. The apps on the phones we are so intimate with now give a discreet / intimate medium to explore those thoughts.
Just my opinion
The reality is though that women, rightly or wrongly, should retain a little mystery. Again, rightly or wrongly, texting pictures of her knockers and kebab isn't going to gain her much respect. If she's just wanting to get laid then fine, but that's the truth, as much of a double-standard as it is. Plenty of women have superb daily lives - all the basics in check; successful careers, raising good kids, strong friends & family circles, well run home life etc. All they are missing is a good seeing to, which is a basic human desire and bloody good fun if with the right company!
A lot don’t even want to be in a proper relationship with a man because they simply don’t need it / don’t have the time / have had their fingers burnt in the past / whatever - a lot of guys read this as ‘she has issues’...
But every other weekend when without their kids they want to indulge and express a side of them that has no other outlet. Some people are just more highly sexed than others.
Anyone who doesn’t get this or believes that other guys are making this s
t up is living in the dark ages, is terrified of the thought of it or has had very little experience with women in the modern era.As a bloke if that’s not what you’re looking for because you’re actively looking for a GF / wife then fair enough, it’s a thanks but no thanks and on you go. But to be derogatory towards such a woman is pretty infantile and short sighted IMHO.
Y’know how acceptable it is for blokes to look at a physically attractive woman and think “I would” without even considering a relationship with her... well surprisingly women look at some men and think exactly the same. The apps on the phones we are so intimate with now give a discreet / intimate medium to explore those thoughts.
Just my opinion
k.Are you trying to meet women who were single in Dickensian times? Does something about women being sexually forthright or confident scare you?
How many guys did your wife sleep with before she met you?
C70R said:
Jesus Christ. What a load of patronising wk.
Are you trying to meet women who were single in Dickensian times? Does something about women being sexually forthright or confident scare you?
How many guys did your wife sleep with before she met you?
Wasn't there a thread around a year back where Fermit referred to " " " " S " " " " as "the little lady indoors" ? k.Are you trying to meet women who were single in Dickensian times? Does something about women being sexually forthright or confident scare you?
How many guys did your wife sleep with before she met you?
Edit: I was mistaken, he is "more modern" than that
.BathyThermo said:
Fermit and Sexy Sarah said:
Frank7 said:
George Smiley said:
Fermit and Sexy Sarah said:
I may be slightly old fashioned, but I never let my wife do physical labour when I'm (likely) better placed to do so. Such stuff is my thing to undertake.
Does she let you undertake some of the women’s chores?Edited by Lemming Train on Monday 16th December 13:35
C70R said:
Jesus Christ. What a load of patronising wk.
Are you trying to meet women who were single in Dickensian times? Does something about women being sexually forthright or confident scare you?
How many guys did your wife sleep with before she met you?
It's nothing to do with Dickensian times. The 40 something lady mentioned, putting it ALL out there, do you think she stands any chance of a relationship, or is she just going to be someones cum bucket for the night? I'd guess the latter, which is fine, if that's what she wants. Leave men wanting a little more, and they'll come back chasing.k.Are you trying to meet women who were single in Dickensian times? Does something about women being sexually forthright or confident scare you?
How many guys did your wife sleep with before she met you?
And of course confident women don't scare me, and I haven't got a clue of her 'number'. Being a proper lady she's retained a little mystery.
Lemming Train said:
C70R said:
Jesus Christ. What a load of patronising wk.
Are you trying to meet women who were single in Dickensian times? Does something about women being sexually forthright or confident scare you?
How many guys did your wife sleep with before she met you?
Wasn't there a thread around a year back where Fermit referred to " " " " S " " " " as "the little lady indoors" ? k.Are you trying to meet women who were single in Dickensian times? Does something about women being sexually forthright or confident scare you?
How many guys did your wife sleep with before she met you?
Edit: I was mistaken, he is "more modern" than that
.BathyThermo said:
Fermit and Sexy Sarah said:
Frank7 said:
George Smiley said:
Fermit and Sexy Sarah said:
I may be slightly old fashioned, but I never let my wife do physical labour when I'm (likely) better placed to do so. Such stuff is my thing to undertake.
Does she let you undertake some of the women’s chores?Edited by Lemming Train on Monday 16th December 13:35
Plate spinner said:
The only reality in this statement is that you are projecting your own very personal views and values about women and sex.
Which is fine. But it’s not ‘the truth’.
Not at all. I've dated/slept with/had dates with enough women to know which one are a bit of fun, which are discarded, and which are keepers. Clue, the latter aren't ones texting me growler snaps before even meeting. The same applies for most men I know, it's hardly a unique view. Which is fine. But it’s not ‘the truth’.
Fermit and Sexy Sarah said:
C70R said:
Jesus Christ. What a load of patronising wk.
Are you trying to meet women who were single in Dickensian times? Does something about women being sexually forthright or confident scare you?
How many guys did your wife sleep with before she met you?
It's nothing to do with Dickensian times. The 40 something lady mentioned, putting it ALL out there, do you think she stands any chance of a relationship, or is she just going to be someones cum bucket for the night? I'd guess the latter, which is fine, if that's what she wants. Leave men wanting a little more, and they'll come back chasing.k.Are you trying to meet women who were single in Dickensian times? Does something about women being sexually forthright or confident scare you?
How many guys did your wife sleep with before she met you?
And of course confident women don't scare me, and I haven't got a clue of her 'number'. Being a proper lady she's retained a little mystery.
She might be one of the nicest women you could hope to meet. Probably isn't, but still -
Fermit and Sexy Sarah said:
Not at all. I've dated/slept with/had dates with enough women to know which one are a bit of fun, which are discarded, and which are keepers. Clue, the latter aren't ones texting me growler snaps before even meeting.
In fairness I've not seen that yet, although I know it's smooth. I've seen the tits, various 'from the back' pics of some very agreeable outfits, and one of her downstairs albeit covered up. This morning I literally woke up to a video of her in a bra and thong. I also know she prefers reverse cowgirl, loves a good spanking and squirts for Scotland. But seemingly pussy pics are a step too far. I also know she doesn't want to share, has never been fisted and when her husband tried to f
k her arse she didn't like it. So swings and roundabouts.Isn't the internet great?
Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff