Body language expert needed.

Body language expert needed.

Author
Discussion

scottydoesntknow

860 posts

58 months

Sunday 17th November 2019
quotequote all
OzzyR1 said:
Not seen the TV interview, but those photos above aren't incriminating.
He states that he’s never been into parties and doesn’t do public displays of affection.

OzzyR1

5,735 posts

233 months

Sunday 17th November 2019
quotequote all
scottydoesntknow said:
He states that he’s never been into parties and doesn’t do public displays of affection.
I couldn't care less one way or the other tbh.

I remember back in the day, he got that "Randy Andy" nickname, apparently for being a prolific playboy at the time. If I was a prince, I'd probably do the same.

That said, it's a total game-changer if he took advantage of young or vulnerable women. That is not acceptable in any way, shape or form.

Mojooo

12,741 posts

181 months

Sunday 17th November 2019
quotequote all
Does the interview make any practical difference - I doubt there is anything he could say that would make people go to his side.

The onus is on the girl to prove it (or the prosecution if US Police are interested).

After this interview people will just forget and move on - so unless the girl produces evidence the interview may well serve to reduce speculation on Andrew in the long term

Johnspex

4,343 posts

185 months

Sunday 17th November 2019
quotequote all
Baby Shark doo doo doo doo said:
Looked extremely uncomfortable, however the so-called BBC probably took the padding out his chair and filled it with ball bearings.
L



Just wondering, why is it the 'so-called BBC'? That's its name, nothing 'so called ' about it.

inabox

291 posts

192 months

Sunday 17th November 2019
quotequote all
Johnspex said:
L



Just wondering, why is it the 'so-called BBC'? That's its name, nothing 'so called ' about it.
Couldn't help but read that with a bad French accent in my mind.

CzechItOut

2,154 posts

192 months

Sunday 17th November 2019
quotequote all
Pizza Express.

Pizza.

Jeez, the guy is openly mocking us wobble

Edited by CzechItOut on Sunday 17th November 11:58

Buster73

Original Poster:

5,066 posts

154 months

Sunday 17th November 2019
quotequote all
CC07 PEU said:
On Sunday? It's on now.
Just had to watch it on iPlayer, I was sure I’d read it was Sunday

Thales

619 posts

58 months

Sunday 17th November 2019
quotequote all
CzechItOut said:
Pizza Express.

Pizza.

Jeez, the guys is openly mocking us wobble
I thought this was a joke. Bloody hell.

DogLog

1,254 posts

267 months

Sunday 17th November 2019
quotequote all
Mojooo said:
Does the interview make any practical difference - I doubt there is anything he could say that would make people go to his side.

The onus is on the girl to prove it (or the prosecution if US Police are interested).

After this interview people will just forget and move on - so unless the girl produces evidence the interview may well serve to reduce speculation on Andrew in the long term
Prove what?
That she shagged him when she was 17 in the UK?

CS Garth

2,860 posts

106 months

Sunday 17th November 2019
quotequote all
Mojooo said:
Does the interview make any practical difference - I doubt there is anything he could say that would make people go to his side.

The onus is on the girl to prove it (or the prosecution if US Police are interested).

After this interview people will just forget and move on - so unless the girl produces evidence the interview may well serve to reduce speculation on Andrew in the long term
Don’t you think it’s this kind of attitude that has allowed many older males in positions of power to get away with things?




anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 18th November 2019
quotequote all
Absolutely cringe-inducing watching him nodding in (subconscious?) agreement with every scenario Maitlis put before him before denying everything.
Some of his alibis were laughable and it was odd how he could remember very specific details of events that placed him elsewhere at the time of alleged events about which he claimed to know nothing.
“I don’t know what you’re talking about because on the night about which I know nothing I was in Pizza Express in Woking”
Or
“I can’t have been at that club because I don’t know where the bar is”

Monkeylegend

26,431 posts

232 months

Monday 18th November 2019
quotequote all
Crossflow Kid said:
Absolutely cringe-inducing watching him nodding in (subconscious?) agreement with every scenario Maitlis put before him before denying everything.
Some of his alibis were laughable and it was odd how he could remember very specific details of events that placed him elsewhere at the time of alleged events about which he claimed to know nothing.
“I don’t know what you’re talking about because on the night about which I know nothing I was in Pizza Express in Woking”
Or
“I can’t have been at that club because I don’t know where the bar is”
...............and yet has no recollection of the things that really matter.

"Did you go to Pizza Express in Windsor on a Saturday night 18 years ago"

"Oh definitely, yes, yes, I had a three cheese thick base topped with pepperami and olives and a diet coke, followed by ice cream and a cup of coffee"

"Did you have sex with that stunning looking young girl that you are pictured with your arm around her waist"

"I have no recollection of that"

Yeah right.

I know which one I would remember most.

Leylandeye

550 posts

56 months

Monday 18th November 2019
quotequote all
Monkeylegend said:
...............and yet has no recollection of the things that really matter.

I know which one I would remember most.
In fairness, he did say that going to PE was very unusual for him so compared to something he was doing all the time, you can understand that the PE experience would be more memorable.

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 18th November 2019
quotequote all
DogLog said:
Mojooo said:
Does the interview make any practical difference - I doubt there is anything he could say that would make people go to his side.

The onus is on the girl to prove it (or the prosecution if US Police are interested).

After this interview people will just forget and move on - so unless the girl produces evidence the interview may well serve to reduce speculation on Andrew in the long term
Prove what?
That she shagged him when she was 17 in the UK?
I'm guessing because you've used her age and alluding to the age of consent in the UK in that statement you don't fully understand what the real issue is here.

It's about she was trafficked for sex.

If he's done the same in the US, it would be underage and involvement in trafficking.

nonsequitur

20,083 posts

117 months

Monday 18th November 2019
quotequote all

I was born in Woking, but I can't remember it.

Monkeylegend

26,431 posts

232 months

Monday 18th November 2019
quotequote all
Leylandeye said:
Monkeylegend said:
...............and yet has no recollection of the things that really matter.

I know which one I would remember most.
In fairness, he did say that going to PE was very unusual for him so compared to something he was doing all the time, you can understand that the PE experience would be more memorable.
Well now you put it like that............. smile

Baby Shark doo doo doo doo

15,077 posts

170 months

Monday 18th November 2019
quotequote all
CzechItOut said:
Pizza Express.

Pizza.

Jeez, the guy is openly mocking us wobble

Edited by CzechItOut on Sunday 17th November 11:58
Trying to get a message out?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pizzagate_conspiracy...

scratchchin

Edited by Baby Shark doo doo doo doo on Monday 18th November 13:09

can't remember

1,078 posts

129 months

Monday 18th November 2019
quotequote all
Oher than ask the interviewer if her daughter was hot I'm not sure what else he could have done to look more suspicious.

Mojooo

12,741 posts

181 months

Tuesday 19th November 2019
quotequote all
Monkeylegend said:
Crossflow Kid said:
Absolutely cringe-inducing watching him nodding in (subconscious?) agreement with every scenario Maitlis put before him before denying everything.
Some of his alibis were laughable and it was odd how he could remember very specific details of events that placed him elsewhere at the time of alleged events about which he claimed to know nothing.
“I don’t know what you’re talking about because on the night about which I know nothing I was in Pizza Express in Woking”
Or
“I can’t have been at that club because I don’t know where the bar is”
...............and yet has no recollection of the things that really matter.

"Did you go to Pizza Express in Windsor on a Saturday night 18 years ago"

"Oh definitely, yes, yes, I had a three cheese thick base topped with pepperami and olives and a diet coke, followed by ice cream and a cup of coffee"

"Did you have sex with that stunning looking young girl that you are pictured with your arm around her waist"

"I have no recollection of that"

Yeah right.

I know which one I would remember most.
I wouldn't be surprised if he or someone in his office kept a diary of what he did so if it said he took his daughter to PE I can certainly see why he might remember if he has only been there once or whatever

He did deny having it away with the woman. So you have misquoted him slightly. He said he had no recollection of meeting her (which is at odds with the photo).

Laurel Green

30,780 posts

233 months

Tuesday 19th November 2019
quotequote all
LBC had a body language expert on this morning, their opinion, he was being evasive.