Things you always wanted to know the answer to [Vol. 5]
Discussion
hidetheelephants said:
Clockwork Cupcake said:
Abbott said:
Thanks for your insight. So is it only in the developer environment?
Yes, as far as I am aware. That's what it was created for anyway, although it's conceivable that it has been applied elsewhere too, I guess. Think of the way SpaceX vs NASA develop rockets. It's agile vs waterfall in project management terms. Two very different approaches to achieving the same outcome. Both would seem alien to the other if you only knew your way.
I'm sure whatever you do has it's own terminology which everyone inside the industry understands, but seems pointless to people outside.
98elise said:
hidetheelephants said:
Clockwork Cupcake said:
Abbott said:
Thanks for your insight. So is it only in the developer environment?
Yes, as far as I am aware. That's what it was created for anyway, although it's conceivable that it has been applied elsewhere too, I guess. Think of the way SpaceX vs NASA develop rockets. It's agile vs waterfall in project management terms. Two very different approaches to achieving the same outcome. Both would seem alien to the other if you only knew your way.
I'm sure whatever you do has it's own terminology which everyone inside the industry understands, but seems pointless to people outside.
hidetheelephants said:
98elise said:
hidetheelephants said:
Clockwork Cupcake said:
Abbott said:
Thanks for your insight. So is it only in the developer environment?
Yes, as far as I am aware. That's what it was created for anyway, although it's conceivable that it has been applied elsewhere too, I guess. Think of the way SpaceX vs NASA develop rockets. It's agile vs waterfall in project management terms. Two very different approaches to achieving the same outcome. Both would seem alien to the other if you only knew your way.
I'm sure whatever you do has it's own terminology which everyone inside the industry understands, but seems pointless to people outside.
Abbott said:
In fairness to her she was asked what she does for work so a valid answer. Just me that didn't have a scooby.
Although, also in fairness, she could have generalised and said she was a project management coach. That was probably all the detail that was required. I suspect she was hoping for a little bit of free marketing.
Fastchas said:
Sheets Tabuer said:
So some bloke has married those conjoined twins, is that technically always having a threesome?
https://metro.co.uk/2024/03/28/conjoined-twin-abby...
Whose (which?) name will be on the marriage certificate?https://metro.co.uk/2024/03/28/conjoined-twin-abby...
And if he has an affair with the other and has sex when his partner is asleep but his mistress isn't, is that un-consensual sex?
So many questions...!
in 1936 Violet married actor James Moore, at the time
of the wedding Daisy was obviously pregnant,
not sure what happened there.
Daisy did find a husband but it lasted all of 10 days,
he said they never could be really alone, no st Sherlock.
Really sad part was that in 1969 they were found dead, Daisy has died
first of the flu and Violet had survived for 2-4 days before death overcame her.
Edited by Nethybridge on Thursday 28th March 19:29
xx99xx said:
Question:
Why do people (mostly in the NPE thread) post a link to a breaking news story without adding any other comment? Do they think people rely solely on PH to find out what's going on in the world?
I get it if there is a comment or opinion added but just posting link....why?
Surely it is just bringing something noteworthy to others attention?Why do people (mostly in the NPE thread) post a link to a breaking news story without adding any other comment? Do they think people rely solely on PH to find out what's going on in the world?
I get it if there is a comment or opinion added but just posting link....why?
And if you can add a comment or opinion, then you add in a bias that others may disagree with and that might not have been the intention?
Nethybridge said:
paua said:
Fess up Nethy, what's your pin?
At my age I have trouble recalling it sometimes, so as an easy aide memoire it's the total number of chess positions after 7 moves divided by the distance to the moon in cubits I was showing someone directions on Google maps the other day and the route took them near Heathrow Airport.
Looking closer at the satellite view and the oddest thing ever struck me.
There are literally no aircraft at any stands at all at any terminal. Totally deserted apart from one Qantas and one Saudi aircraft on the taxiways.
Apart from that, Heathrow is completely deserted and that is impossible so why on earth have google removed hundreds of aircraft from the images?
In fact, even our staff car park image has been manipulated.
There are normally only a handful of spaces left at any one time. it is never ever this empty and in the image there are multiple cars that look as if they have been placed there and copied and pasted at random!
Looking closer at the satellite view and the oddest thing ever struck me.
There are literally no aircraft at any stands at all at any terminal. Totally deserted apart from one Qantas and one Saudi aircraft on the taxiways.
Apart from that, Heathrow is completely deserted and that is impossible so why on earth have google removed hundreds of aircraft from the images?
In fact, even our staff car park image has been manipulated.
There are normally only a handful of spaces left at any one time. it is never ever this empty and in the image there are multiple cars that look as if they have been placed there and copied and pasted at random!
Edited by nessiemac on Saturday 30th March 15:14
nessiemac said:
I was showing someone directions on Google maps the other day and the route took them near Heathrow Airport.
Looking closer at the satellite view and the oddest thing ever struck me.
There are literally no aircraft at any stands at all at any terminal. Totally deserted apart from one Qantas and one Saudi aircraft on the taxiways.
Apart from that, Heathrow is completely deserted and that is impossible so why on earth have google removed hundreds of aircraft from the images?
Was the satellite photo taken during a Covid lockdown perhaps?Looking closer at the satellite view and the oddest thing ever struck me.
There are literally no aircraft at any stands at all at any terminal. Totally deserted apart from one Qantas and one Saudi aircraft on the taxiways.
Apart from that, Heathrow is completely deserted and that is impossible so why on earth have google removed hundreds of aircraft from the images?
Clockwork Cupcake said:
nessiemac said:
I was showing someone directions on Google maps the other day and the route took them near Heathrow Airport.
Looking closer at the satellite view and the oddest thing ever struck me.
There are literally no aircraft at any stands at all at any terminal. Totally deserted apart from one Qantas and one Saudi aircraft on the taxiways.
Apart from that, Heathrow is completely deserted and that is impossible so why on earth have google removed hundreds of aircraft from the images?
Was the satellite photo taken during a Covid lockdown perhaps?Looking closer at the satellite view and the oddest thing ever struck me.
There are literally no aircraft at any stands at all at any terminal. Totally deserted apart from one Qantas and one Saudi aircraft on the taxiways.
Apart from that, Heathrow is completely deserted and that is impossible so why on earth have google removed hundreds of aircraft from the images?
nessiemac said:
Can't have been. There were more aircraft parked up at every stand than usual and all round the engineering base for months during 2020.
Going from the google maps ticker thing it's from April 2020; oddly there's two sets of images from April, the empty one is the second of the two.Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff