Things you always wanted to know the answer to [Vol. 5]

Things you always wanted to know the answer to [Vol. 5]

Author
Discussion

popeyewhite

19,907 posts

120 months

Monday 15th April
quotequote all
Alickadoo said:
£114!

What are you saying that Osprey is £106 better than this?

https://www.sportsdirect.com/gelert-backpack-sn42-...
Easily.

Cotty

39,553 posts

284 months

Monday 15th April
quotequote all
Alickadoo said:
£114!

What are you saying that Osprey is £106 better than this?

https://www.sportsdirect.com/gelert-backpack-sn42-...
Yes all day long and twice on Sunday.

Alickadoo

1,705 posts

23 months

Monday 15th April
quotequote all
Cotty said:
Alickadoo said:
£114!

What are you saying that Osprey is £106 better than this?

https://www.sportsdirect.com/gelert-backpack-sn42-...
Yes all day long and twice on Sunday.
Fourteen times better?

Please excuse me for my obsession with money.

Cotty

39,553 posts

284 months

Monday 15th April
quotequote all
Alickadoo said:
Fourteen times better?

Please excuse me for my obsession with money.
Why don't you go and look at one and you decide.

bodhi

10,515 posts

229 months

Monday 15th April
quotequote all
Having spent a fair amount of time sampling the joys of air travel, I don't think the benefits of a decent bag can be overstated enough - it's going to be on and off your shoulder a fair few times in a few hours, it gets jammed under seats and in overhead lockers and obviously has to fit everything you need and be easy to get stuff out of for security.

Not sure I'd spend £116, but I've got a Burton rucksack and a Troop messenger bag, both of which make the whole process much easier and more comfortable than the cheap stuff work gave me, like that bag linked to at Big Mug Enterprises.

hidetheelephants

24,402 posts

193 months

Monday 15th April
quotequote all
bodhi said:
Big Mug Enterprises.
hehe

valiant

10,236 posts

160 months

Monday 15th April
quotequote all
Cotty said:
Alickadoo said:
Fourteen times better?

Please excuse me for my obsession with money.
Why don't you go and look at one and you decide.
Yep. yes

I absolutely batter my bags at work and my Osprey has outlasted anything else I’ve owned and still looks in decent shape. Cheap bags are a false economy.

Besides, you can pick them up in sales for less than that as Osprey update regularly and reduce last seasons stock accordingly.

Cotty

39,553 posts

284 months

Monday 15th April
quotequote all
valiant said:
Yep. yes

I absolutely batter my bags at work and my Osprey has outlasted anything else I’ve owned and still looks in decent shape. Cheap bags are a false economy.

Besides, you can pick them up in sales for less than that as Osprey update regularly and reduce last seasons stock accordingly.
One update that I thought was odd is the padded laptop sleeve only has one zip so you can lock the zips together. There is a fabric tab that you can lock to the single zip.

Rich Boy Spanner

1,321 posts

130 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
audi321 said:
Roofless Toothless said:
Halmyre said:
You're allowed to store small bags under the seat in front, are you not? I've never had any bother.
The seat in front? Surely it goes under your own seat. The passenger in the foremost seat hasn’t got a seat in front and would have to use his own seat to stow away luggage, and so on all the way to the back of the plane.
It’s supposed to go under the seat in front of you.

The passengers in the foremost seats have to stow their luggage in the overhead lockers as they’re going to be exit seats.
Note also that different aircraft types have different seat options to the airline. Some have more space under them than others. An A320 generally has more under seat space that a B737. Also, if you are on an airline with in-seat power or IFE the boxes for those can take a chunk of your space away.

Trustmeimadoctor

12,604 posts

155 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
Rich Boy Spanner said:
audi321 said:
Roofless Toothless said:
Halmyre said:
You're allowed to store small bags under the seat in front, are you not? I've never had any bother.
The seat in front? Surely it goes under your own seat. The passenger in the foremost seat hasn’t got a seat in front and would have to use his own seat to stow away luggage, and so on all the way to the back of the plane.
It’s supposed to go under the seat in front of you.

The passengers in the foremost seats have to stow their luggage in the overhead lockers as they’re going to be exit seats.
Note also that different aircraft types have different seat options to the airline. Some have more space under them than others. An A320 generally has more under seat space that a B737. Also, if you are on an airline with in-seat power or IFE the boxes for those can take a chunk of your space away.
yep very hard to store my bags under the lay flat bed of the person in front wink but thats why we get more locker space and more cupboards

Rusty Old-Banger

3,836 posts

213 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
Trustmeimadoctor said:
Rich Boy Spanner said:
audi321 said:
Roofless Toothless said:
Halmyre said:
You're allowed to store small bags under the seat in front, are you not? I've never had any bother.
The seat in front? Surely it goes under your own seat. The passenger in the foremost seat hasn’t got a seat in front and would have to use his own seat to stow away luggage, and so on all the way to the back of the plane.
It’s supposed to go under the seat in front of you.

The passengers in the foremost seats have to stow their luggage in the overhead lockers as they’re going to be exit seats.
Note also that different aircraft types have different seat options to the airline. Some have more space under them than others. An A320 generally has more under seat space that a B737. Also, if you are on an airline with in-seat power or IFE the boxes for those can take a chunk of your space away.
yep very hard to store my bags under the lay flat bed of the person in front wink but thats why we get more locker space and more cupboards
rofl

The cringe.

Trustmeimadoctor

12,604 posts

155 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
Rusty Old-Banger said:
Trustmeimadoctor said:
Rich Boy Spanner said:
audi321 said:
Roofless Toothless said:
Halmyre said:
You're allowed to store small bags under the seat in front, are you not? I've never had any bother.
The seat in front? Surely it goes under your own seat. The passenger in the foremost seat hasn’t got a seat in front and would have to use his own seat to stow away luggage, and so on all the way to the back of the plane.
It’s supposed to go under the seat in front of you.

The passengers in the foremost seats have to stow their luggage in the overhead lockers as they’re going to be exit seats.
Note also that different aircraft types have different seat options to the airline. Some have more space under them than others. An A320 generally has more under seat space that a B737. Also, if you are on an airline with in-seat power or IFE the boxes for those can take a chunk of your space away.
yep very hard to store my bags under the lay flat bed of the person in front wink but thats why we get more locker space and more cupboards
rofl

The cringe.
jealousy i tell you!
i will get my man servant to come and educate you smile

Fatboy

7,979 posts

272 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
Trustmeimadoctor said:
Rusty Old-Banger said:
Trustmeimadoctor said:
Rich Boy Spanner said:
audi321 said:
Roofless Toothless said:
Halmyre said:
You're allowed to store small bags under the seat in front, are you not? I've never had any bother.
The seat in front? Surely it goes under your own seat. The passenger in the foremost seat hasn’t got a seat in front and would have to use his own seat to stow away luggage, and so on all the way to the back of the plane.
It’s supposed to go under the seat in front of you.

The passengers in the foremost seats have to stow their luggage in the overhead lockers as they’re going to be exit seats.
Note also that different aircraft types have different seat options to the airline. Some have more space under them than others. An A320 generally has more under seat space that a B737. Also, if you are on an airline with in-seat power or IFE the boxes for those can take a chunk of your space away.
yep very hard to store my bags under the lay flat bed of the person in front wink but thats why we get more locker space and more cupboards
rofl

The cringe.
jealousy i tell you!
i will get my man servant to come and educate you smile
I think he's cringing that you share a plane with other passengers!

Trustmeimadoctor

12,604 posts

155 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
ah there is that

but im not paying for the servant to go on another plane, that's just frivolity gone mad

Nethybridge

931 posts

12 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
On the subject of aviation, why do my ears hurt to buggery on the
descent from 30 000ft but not on the climb to cruising altitude ?

Clockwork Cupcake

74,582 posts

272 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
Nethybridge said:
On the subject of aviation, why do my ears hurt to buggery on the
descent from 30 000ft but not on the climb to cruising altitude ?
Because on the ascent it is decreasing pressure and on the descent it is increasing pressure, and your ears are evidently more sensitive to the latter.

48k

13,093 posts

148 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
Nethybridge said:
On the subject of aviation, why do my ears hurt to buggery on the
descent from 30 000ft but not on the climb to cruising altitude ?
It might be that the way the climb profile is stepped, you are doing enough chewing/swallowing/yawning/whatever during that time to keep the inner ear pressure equalised enough that it is not causing you discomfort. Whereas perhaps the way the descent happens, you are doing larger drops in one go and the pressure differential your ears are experiencing is getting too great before you can equalise it.

popeyewhite

19,907 posts

120 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
Nethybridge said:
On the subject of aviation, why do my ears hurt to buggery on the
descent from 30 000ft but not on the climb to cruising altitude ?
As cabins are pressurised it shouldn't make much difference. I think my ears may 'pop' sometimes but i don't keep score. Perhaps you have an old or chronic eardrum injury?

StevieBee

12,905 posts

255 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
Nethybridge said:
On the subject of aviation, why do my ears hurt to buggery on the
descent from 30 000ft but not on the climb to cruising altitude ?
As cabins are pressurised it shouldn't make much difference. I think my ears may 'pop' sometimes but i don't keep score. Perhaps you have an old or chronic eardrum injury?
I've often wondered why I am impervious to this yet both my wife and lad suffer greatly from it! What I have I got/not got that's different,.

21st Century Man

40,917 posts

248 months

Tuesday 16th April
quotequote all
StevieBee said:
popeyewhite said:
Nethybridge said:
On the subject of aviation, why do my ears hurt to buggery on the
descent from 30 000ft but not on the climb to cruising altitude ?
As cabins are pressurised it shouldn't make much difference. I think my ears may 'pop' sometimes but i don't keep score. Perhaps you have an old or chronic eardrum injury?
I've often wondered why I am impervious to this yet both my wife and lad suffer greatly from it! What I have I got/not got that's different,.
Me too. Ditto jet lag, even long haul. I set my watch on arrival and that's the time, no problem, whether east or west.