Conspiracy theorists... are they all just a bit thick?
Discussion
Jim Ferguson claims Japan have banned the Covid vaccine over fears of excess deaths.
Can't find any other reports on it?
https://twitter.com/JimFergusonUK/status/177258785...
Can't find any other reports on it?
https://twitter.com/JimFergusonUK/status/177258785...
Legacywr said:
Jim Ferguson claims Japan have banned the Covid vaccine over fears of excess deaths.
Can't find any other reports on it?
https://twitter.com/JimFergusonUK/status/177258785...
Just look at the community note...Can't find any other reports on it?
https://twitter.com/JimFergusonUK/status/177258785...
The old ‘The Simpsons predicted the future’ subject has just been mentioned on social media, and straight away, out they come..
Facebook CTist said:
‘The Simpsons are never wrong because they are in the governments' pocket, and they write about what the government wants them to write about to condition all of us. They haven't been around for as long as they have because they're a threat to the government.’
Facebook CTist said:
‘The Simpsons are never wrong because they are in the governments' pocket, and they write about what the government wants them to write about to condition all of us. They haven't been around for as long as they have because they're a threat to the government.’
Al Gorithum said:
Anyone see Turning Point - The Bomb and Cold War (Netflix)?
IMO apart from being fascinating (and scary) the last episode includes Russia's efforts in disseminating misinformation (and conspracy theories) in order to divide the West. Seems to have worked pretty well...
It is somewhat ironic that very nationlist republicans wanting to make America great again, are in all likelihood at some point sharing and supporting Russian misinformationIMO apart from being fascinating (and scary) the last episode includes Russia's efforts in disseminating misinformation (and conspracy theories) in order to divide the West. Seems to have worked pretty well...
Do CT's all tend to subscribe to each theory in the contrarian position ?
i.e. if this one is terrorism, not just a tragic accident does that same individual also do flat earth, moon landings and 9/11 as well ?
Do they ever think anything isnt more complicated and some massive government plot/cover up ?
Has anyone analysed their brain activity ?
I suppose out of all the Conspiracy Theories, one or more may have some basis in fact, we dont know everything but it always seems a particular type of utter cock in my experience that tends to be a Conspiracy Theorist.
I am sure it may be possible to cause a maritime accident as a terrorist, but it would be a lot harder to do than just blowing a bridge up I would expect, semi packed full of explosives for example ?
Seems to be a really hard thing to contrive and would need a lot of knowledge of ship movements, capabilities, systems and the construction of the bridge, where to hit it etc, timing all that remotely to happen and achieve the result would be hard. Are the ships systems internet facing ? wouldnt have thought so, seems implausible to the point of being irrelevant, like playing a massive game of snooker remotely, with a massive container ship.
Must be weird seeing everything and assuming it was something other than the obvious, must be wearing arguing your point when everyone calls you a bell end, sometimes they may be right but not often I dont think.
Bet there is loads of weird stuff that goes on, but like religion, I think conspiracy theorists are barking at the moon.
i.e. if this one is terrorism, not just a tragic accident does that same individual also do flat earth, moon landings and 9/11 as well ?
Do they ever think anything isnt more complicated and some massive government plot/cover up ?
Has anyone analysed their brain activity ?
I suppose out of all the Conspiracy Theories, one or more may have some basis in fact, we dont know everything but it always seems a particular type of utter cock in my experience that tends to be a Conspiracy Theorist.
I am sure it may be possible to cause a maritime accident as a terrorist, but it would be a lot harder to do than just blowing a bridge up I would expect, semi packed full of explosives for example ?
Seems to be a really hard thing to contrive and would need a lot of knowledge of ship movements, capabilities, systems and the construction of the bridge, where to hit it etc, timing all that remotely to happen and achieve the result would be hard. Are the ships systems internet facing ? wouldnt have thought so, seems implausible to the point of being irrelevant, like playing a massive game of snooker remotely, with a massive container ship.
Must be weird seeing everything and assuming it was something other than the obvious, must be wearing arguing your point when everyone calls you a bell end, sometimes they may be right but not often I dont think.
Bet there is loads of weird stuff that goes on, but like religion, I think conspiracy theorists are barking at the moon.
J4CKO said:
Do CT's all tend to subscribe to each theory in the contrarian position ?
i.e. if this one is terrorism, not just a tragic accident does that same individual also do flat earth, moon landings and 9/11 as well ?
Do they ever think anything isnt more complicated and some massive government plot/cover up ?
Has anyone analysed their brain activity ?
I suppose out of all the Conspiracy Theories, one or more may have some basis in fact, we dont know everything but it always seems a particular type of utter cock in my experience that tends to be a Conspiracy Theorist.
I am sure it may be possible to cause a maritime accident as a terrorist, but it would be a lot harder to do than just blowing a bridge up I would expect, semi packed full of explosives for example ?
Seems to be a really hard thing to contrive and would need a lot of knowledge of ship movements, capabilities, systems and the construction of the bridge, where to hit it etc, timing all that remotely to happen and achieve the result would be hard. Are the ships systems internet facing ? wouldnt have thought so, seems implausible to the point of being irrelevant, like playing a massive game of snooker remotely, with a massive container ship.
Must be weird seeing everything and assuming it was something other than the obvious, must be wearing arguing your point when everyone calls you a bell end, sometimes they may be right but not often I dont think.
Bet there is loads of weird stuff that goes on, but like religion, I think conspiracy theorists are barking at the moon.
There have been a lot of empirical studies on behaviour types and profiling of people that have beliefs across a number of issues. Ultimately there are some fundamental desires and needs, often around proving that something like 'Authority' is out to get us. i.e. if this one is terrorism, not just a tragic accident does that same individual also do flat earth, moon landings and 9/11 as well ?
Do they ever think anything isnt more complicated and some massive government plot/cover up ?
Has anyone analysed their brain activity ?
I suppose out of all the Conspiracy Theories, one or more may have some basis in fact, we dont know everything but it always seems a particular type of utter cock in my experience that tends to be a Conspiracy Theorist.
I am sure it may be possible to cause a maritime accident as a terrorist, but it would be a lot harder to do than just blowing a bridge up I would expect, semi packed full of explosives for example ?
Seems to be a really hard thing to contrive and would need a lot of knowledge of ship movements, capabilities, systems and the construction of the bridge, where to hit it etc, timing all that remotely to happen and achieve the result would be hard. Are the ships systems internet facing ? wouldnt have thought so, seems implausible to the point of being irrelevant, like playing a massive game of snooker remotely, with a massive container ship.
Must be weird seeing everything and assuming it was something other than the obvious, must be wearing arguing your point when everyone calls you a bell end, sometimes they may be right but not often I dont think.
Bet there is loads of weird stuff that goes on, but like religion, I think conspiracy theorists are barking at the moon.
What they found in the studies is that someone who might say believe in the great reset, will be more likely to believe in various COVID conspiracies for example. They very rarely believe in just one thing, its a case of having that single outcome i.e. 'authority are lying to us' and finding anything that supports that.
Its obviously a huge spectrum of degrees, everyone is on it somewhere, some people are just curious and asking questions genuinely, others are already believing their pre-disposition on something and asking questions where they only listen to one answer to confirm it.
The Baltimore bridge is a good one. We’re told to ‘wake up people’ of course.
Why are those explosions (sparks) happening on the other support points on the right hand side as the bridge collapses?
Maybe it was much cheaper and more practical to run electrical supplies through the bridge, rather than under the river.
But no, it was a distraction tactic, it was blown up apparently.
Courtesy of a TikTok vid.
Why are those explosions (sparks) happening on the other support points on the right hand side as the bridge collapses?
Maybe it was much cheaper and more practical to run electrical supplies through the bridge, rather than under the river.
But no, it was a distraction tactic, it was blown up apparently.
Courtesy of a TikTok vid.
Legacywr said:
Jim Ferguson claims Japan have banned the Covid vaccine over fears of excess deaths.
Can't find any other reports on it?
https://twitter.com/JimFergusonUK/status/177258785...
ah there must be a cover-up then! Can't find any other reports on it?
https://twitter.com/JimFergusonUK/status/177258785...
J4CKO said:
Do CT's all tend to subscribe to each theory in the contrarian position ?
i.e. if this one is terrorism, not just a tragic accident does that same individual also do flat earth, moon landings and 9/11 as well ?
Do they ever think anything isnt more complicated and some massive government plot/cover up ?
Has anyone analysed their brain activity ?
I suppose out of all the Conspiracy Theories, one or more may have some basis in fact, we dont know everything but it always seems a particular type of utter cock in my experience that tends to be a Conspiracy Theorist.
I am sure it may be possible to cause a maritime accident as a terrorist, but it would be a lot harder to do than just blowing a bridge up I would expect, semi packed full of explosives for example ?
Seems to be a really hard thing to contrive and would need a lot of knowledge of ship movements, capabilities, systems and the construction of the bridge, where to hit it etc, timing all that remotely to happen and achieve the result would be hard. Are the ships systems internet facing ? wouldnt have thought so, seems implausible to the point of being irrelevant, like playing a massive game of snooker remotely, with a massive container ship.
Must be weird seeing everything and assuming it was something other than the obvious, must be wearing arguing your point when everyone calls you a bell end, sometimes they may be right but not often I dont think.
Bet there is loads of weird stuff that goes on, but like religion, I think conspiracy theorists are barking at the moon.
5G is already doing that by scanning the Covid chip. i.e. if this one is terrorism, not just a tragic accident does that same individual also do flat earth, moon landings and 9/11 as well ?
Do they ever think anything isnt more complicated and some massive government plot/cover up ?
Has anyone analysed their brain activity ?
I suppose out of all the Conspiracy Theories, one or more may have some basis in fact, we dont know everything but it always seems a particular type of utter cock in my experience that tends to be a Conspiracy Theorist.
I am sure it may be possible to cause a maritime accident as a terrorist, but it would be a lot harder to do than just blowing a bridge up I would expect, semi packed full of explosives for example ?
Seems to be a really hard thing to contrive and would need a lot of knowledge of ship movements, capabilities, systems and the construction of the bridge, where to hit it etc, timing all that remotely to happen and achieve the result would be hard. Are the ships systems internet facing ? wouldnt have thought so, seems implausible to the point of being irrelevant, like playing a massive game of snooker remotely, with a massive container ship.
Must be weird seeing everything and assuming it was something other than the obvious, must be wearing arguing your point when everyone calls you a bell end, sometimes they may be right but not often I dont think.
Bet there is loads of weird stuff that goes on, but like religion, I think conspiracy theorists are barking at the moon.
Legacywr said:
Jim Ferguson claims Japan have banned the Covid vaccine over fears of excess deaths.
Can't find any other reports on it?
https://twitter.com/JimFergusonUK/status/177258785...
Not true, and fabricated by someone who made the same false claim only about Iceland just a few weeks ago.Can't find any other reports on it?
https://twitter.com/JimFergusonUK/status/177258785...
Intriguingly I recognised at least one conspiracy theorist I recognised amongst the people responding to his post, stating it was fabricated and untrue.
Which begs the question, if one conspiracy theorist is called out for spreading false information by another person who themselves promotes conspiracy theories, what objective measures can an independent bystander take to assess who's actually telling the truth? (Or perhaps more plausibly, they can't agree amongst themselves what stories to concoct next.)
Chromegrill said:
Legacywr said:
Jim Ferguson claims Japan have banned the Covid vaccine over fears of excess deaths.
Can't find any other reports on it?
https://twitter.com/JimFergusonUK/status/177258785...
Not true, and fabricated by someone who made the same false claim only about Iceland just a few weeks ago.Can't find any other reports on it?
https://twitter.com/JimFergusonUK/status/177258785...
Intriguingly I recognised at least one conspiracy theorist I recognised amongst the people responding to his post, stating it was fabricated and untrue.
Which begs the question, if one conspiracy theorist is called out for spreading false information by another person who themselves promotes conspiracy theories, what objective measures can an independent bystander take to assess who's actually telling the truth? (Or perhaps more plausibly, they can't agree amongst themselves what stories to concoct next.)
Chromegrill said:
Not true, and fabricated by someone who made the same false claim only about Iceland just a few weeks ago.
Intriguingly I recognised at least one conspiracy theorist I recognised amongst the people responding to his post, stating it was fabricated and untrue.
Which begs the question, if one conspiracy theorist is called out for spreading false information by another person who themselves promotes conspiracy theories, what objective measures can an independent bystander take to assess who's actually telling the truth? (Or perhaps more plausibly, they can't agree amongst themselves what stories to concoct next.)
For the big pushers it's all about the clicks and likes and consequent revenue.Intriguingly I recognised at least one conspiracy theorist I recognised amongst the people responding to his post, stating it was fabricated and untrue.
Which begs the question, if one conspiracy theorist is called out for spreading false information by another person who themselves promotes conspiracy theories, what objective measures can an independent bystander take to assess who's actually telling the truth? (Or perhaps more plausibly, they can't agree amongst themselves what stories to concoct next.)
Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff