Geek Jokes Volume 0b10

Geek Jokes Volume 0b10

Author
Discussion

judas

5,994 posts

260 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
TGCOTF-dewey said:
BrokenSkunk said:
It's not a joke, but I was lying in bed a few days ago wondering, and if this isn't the right place to share my musings...

If it is the job of a spaceship's "shields" to absorb energy from an attacker's weapons, then why should they become more and more depleted as they absorb multiple hits? Shouldn't they get stronger?
Because they have to dump the energy as heat... Powering the heat exchange system uses a lot of MWe.

That's how they work on the USS Dewey.
That seems horribly inefficent, and probably in contravention of a dozen Starfleet eco-directives. Still, second law of thermodynamics and all that - you think they'd find some way to harvest that energy and put it to good use hehe

Clockwork Cupcake

74,807 posts

273 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
judas said:
That seems horribly inefficent, and probably in contravention of a dozen Starfleet eco-directives. Still, second law of thermodynamics and all that - you think they'd find some way to harvest that energy and put it to good use hehe
Well, quite.

Of course, the out-of-universe answer is so we can have the tense "the shields cannae take it, Cap'n" dramatic moments so the film/show can happen (I'm going to have to ask you to get all the way off my back about that, sir!).

The alternative is "Ha ha! Shoot us all you like, suckers! The more you shoot us the stronger our shields get!" which would be kind of boring. biggrin


judas

5,994 posts

260 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
Clockwork Cupcake said:
judas said:
That seems horribly inefficent, and probably in contravention of a dozen Starfleet eco-directives. Still, second law of thermodynamics and all that - you think they'd find some way to harvest that energy and put it to good use hehe
Well, quite.

Of course, the out-of-universe answer is so we can have the tense "the shields cannae take it, Cap'n" dramatic moments so the film/show can happen (I'm going to have to ask you to get all the way off my back about that, sir!).

The alternative is "Ha ha! Shoot us all you like, suckers! The more you shoot us the stronger our shields get!" which would be kind of boring. biggrin
Yeah, but.. but... physics, maaaan! getmecoat

BrokenSkunk

4,594 posts

251 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
judas said:
That seems horribly inefficent, and probably in contravention of a dozen Starfleet eco-directives. Still, second law of thermodynamics and all that - you think they'd find some way to harvest that energy and put it to good use hehe
Exactly.
For example you could use the energy to make the shields stronger.

Or, given that e=mc^2...

Every 60 PW of energy dumped into the shield could be used to make 667 grams of matter.
At a density of 957 grams per litre, that's enough for a 70cl of whisky.
You'd probably have to ask the enemy to keep shooting if you needed a bottle to put it in.

Halmyre

11,248 posts

140 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
BrokenSkunk said:
judas said:
That seems horribly inefficent, and probably in contravention of a dozen Starfleet eco-directives. Still, second law of thermodynamics and all that - you think they'd find some way to harvest that energy and put it to good use hehe
Exactly.
For example you could use the energy to make the shields stronger.

Or, given that e=mc^2...

Every 60 PW of energy dumped into the shield could be used to make 667 grams of matter.
At a density of 957 grams per litre, that's enough for a 70cl of whisky.
You'd probably have to ask the enemy to keep shooting if you needed a bottle to put it in.
A bottle? What for?


dxg

8,259 posts

261 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
TGCOTF-dewey said:
BrokenSkunk said:
It's not a joke, but I was lying in bed a few days ago wondering, and if this isn't the right place to share my musings...

If it is the job of a spaceship's "shields" to absorb energy from an attacker's weapons, then why should they become more and more depleted as they absorb multiple hits? Shouldn't they get stronger?
Because they have to dump the energy as heat... Powering the heat exchange system uses a lot of MWe.

That's how they work on the USS Dewey.
But how do they work on the USS Huey and USS Louie?

wolfracesonic

7,074 posts

128 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
judas said:
That seems horribly inefficent, and probably in contravention of a dozen Starfleet eco-directives. Still, second law of thermodynamics and all that - you think they'd find some way to harvest that energy and put it to good use hehe
If we can sort out regenerative braking in the 21st century…‘tards.

shirt

22,663 posts

202 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
dxg said:
TGCOTF-dewey said:
BrokenSkunk said:
It's not a joke, but I was lying in bed a few days ago wondering, and if this isn't the right place to share my musings...

If it is the job of a spaceship's "shields" to absorb energy from an attacker's weapons, then why should they become more and more depleted as they absorb multiple hits? Shouldn't they get stronger?
Because they have to dump the energy as heat... Powering the heat exchange system uses a lot of MWe.

That's how they work on the USS Dewey.
But how do they work on the USS Huey and USS Louie?
They can’t dissipate the energy as well, leading to a danger of quacks in the hull.

Strangely Brown

10,121 posts

232 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
shirt said:
They can’t dissipate the energy as well, leading to a danger of quacks in the hull.
That deserves far more recognition than it will get. biggrin

Clockwork Cupcake

74,807 posts

273 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
Which poses the question: "do subatomic ducks quark?"


MartG

20,712 posts

205 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all

captain_cynic

12,146 posts

96 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
The_Doc said:
You do know that we haven't got any further than the Moon and nobody's found or seen a green man yet..........

smile
Then how do you know when to cross the road?

Poultry may or may not be involved

TGCOTF-dewey

5,262 posts

56 months

Thursday 28th March
quotequote all
dxg said:
TGCOTF-dewey said:
BrokenSkunk said:
It's not a joke, but I was lying in bed a few days ago wondering, and if this isn't the right place to share my musings...

If it is the job of a spaceship's "shields" to absorb energy from an attacker's weapons, then why should they become more and more depleted as they absorb multiple hits? Shouldn't they get stronger?
Because they have to dump the energy as heat... Powering the heat exchange system uses a lot of MWe.

That's how they work on the USS Dewey.
But how do they work on the USS Huey and USS Louie?
Both lost to space gardening accidents... Hence the shield upgrade on Dewey.

Clockwork Cupcake

74,807 posts

273 months

Thursday 28th March
quotequote all
TGCOTF-dewey said:
Both lost to space gardening accidents... Hence the shield upgrade on Dewey.
Nice Sci-Fi film reference there. thumbup

TGCOTF-dewey

5,262 posts

56 months

Thursday 28th March
quotequote all
Clockwork Cupcake said:
Nice Sci-Fi film reference there. thumbup
Well my user name is the last line of the film.

Al made me shorten it as it broke PH's formatting.

Take good care of the forest dewey.

dxg

8,259 posts

261 months

Thursday 28th March
quotequote all
TGCOTF-dewey said:
Clockwork Cupcake said:
Nice Sci-Fi film reference there. thumbup
Well my user name is the last line of the film.

Al made me shorten it as it broke PH's formatting.

Take good care of the forest dewey.
And there was me thinking you were referring to this: https://ducktales.fandom.com/wiki/Duckworth%27s_Re...

Clockwork Cupcake

74,807 posts

273 months

Thursday 28th March
quotequote all
TGCOTF-dewey said:
Well my user name is the last line of the film.

Al made me shorten it as it broke PH's formatting.

Take good care of the forest dewey.
thumbup

Well there you go then. Anyway, I got the reference. smile

98elise

26,740 posts

162 months

Thursday 28th March
quotequote all
TGCOTF-dewey said:
Clockwork Cupcake said:
Nice Sci-Fi film reference there. thumbup
Well my user name is the last line of the film.

Al made me shorten it as it broke PH's formatting.

Take good care of the forest dewey.
I never considered how the robots worked until I read an article a few years ago. I'd just assumed some sort of special effects but it was actually actors with missing lower body/limbs.

Clockwork Cupcake

74,807 posts

273 months

Thursday 28th March
quotequote all
98elise said:
I never considered how the robots worked until I read an article a few years ago. I'd just assumed some sort of special effects but it was actually actors with missing lower body/limbs.
Yup. The most practical of practical effects.

It's part of the immense charm of the film.

ZesPak

24,439 posts

197 months

Friday 29th March
quotequote all
98elise said:
I never considered how the robots worked until I read an article a few years ago. I'd just assumed some sort of special effects but it was actually actors with missing lower body/limbs.
yes

There's actually a "making of" documentary released a couple of years later that shows this.