Strange neighbour problems....Cameras..

[Ecks Ridgehead]

thegman said:

P-bomb.

Hmm that didn't give me the rush I was hoping for.

You're obviously not saying it right.

[Asterix]

...or put up a camera that watches his camera so you can record images of his camera, taken by your camera, looking in the wrong direction.

[BOR]

silversun said:

If the guy really is a paedophile then it's unlikely he would advertise the fact by training cameras on your daughter's room. He probably doesn't even realise it is her room.

Exactly. He might simply be perving over the wife.

[MentalSarcasm]

BOR said:

silversun said:

If the guy really is a paedophile then it's unlikely he would advertise the fact by training cameras on your daughter's room. He probably doesn't even realise it is her room.

Exactly. He might simply be perving over the wife.

Or the OP.

[hornetrider]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

[pitchfork]BURN HIM![/pitchfork]

[TonyHetherington]

If he asks you how the mole on your bum is doing, at least you know not to unleash the P-bomb on him.

[BOR]

MentalSarcasm said:

BOR said:

silversun said:

If the guy really is a paedophile then it's unlikely he would advertise the fact by training cameras on your daughter's room. He probably doesn't even realise it is her room.

Exactly. He might simply be perving over the wife.

Or the OP.

In that case time to drop the P-Bomb (Ooooooooh, feels goooooooooooooooooooooooood)

[trimbo]

silversun said:

Sure I'm going to get flamed for this, but do people seriously think it's a good thing to label someone as a paedophile, potentially ruining their life, with no proof?

If the guy really is a paedophile then it's unlikely he would advertise the fact by training cameras on your daughter's room. He probably doesn't even realise it is her room.

He's probably got paranoid over some neighbour dispute or repeated vandalism and has put up the cameras as a result.

that's a reasonable and considered post, but I'm already halfway through painting my 'Paedos Burn in Hellfire!' placard, there's no going back......

[Ecks Ridgehead]

Asterix said:

...or put up a camera that watches his camera so you can record images of his camera, taken by your camera, looking in the wrong direction.

A-ha, so the watcher becomes the watchee...that's surveillancewang! I like your thinking.

[SpydieNut]

MentalSarcasm said:

BOR said:

silversun said:

If the guy really is a paedophile then it's unlikely he would advertise the fact by training cameras on your daughter's room. He probably doesn't even realise it is her room.

Exactly. He might simply be perving over the wife.

Or the OP.

i think he's a hortiingculturalist and has got the hots for the OP's two lips

[merc_man]

BOR said:

He might simply be perving over the wife.

Or you (you haven't been dressing up as Erik Estrada again have ou?)

[Ecks Ridgehead]

BOR said:

P-Bomb (Ooooooooh, feels goooooooooooooooooooooooood)

Yeah, that's the stuff. You're in the P-bomb zone now.

[cottonfoo]

You can report him to the Information Commissioner, have a look at the CCTV Code Of Practice (this is a PDF)

http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/dat...

[shadowninja]

I'd erect a tall fence in front of the camera.







With "You are a cvnt!" sprayed on his side.

[Silverbullet767]

Pee-Bomb

Not as satisfying as it sounds. bursting for the loo, 'oh that'll be a pee-bomb' maybe its sort of a number 1 and number 2 combination on the toilet.

Ive taken this way to far.

Oh and on-topic get the police involved, but I would'nt label him anything without proof.

[bob1179]

Ecks Ridgehead said:

BOR said:

P-Bomb (Ooooooooh, feels goooooooooooooooooooooooood)

Yeah, that's the stuff. You're in the P-bomb zone now.

Can I try?



P-Bomb.



He he. I felt a tingle.

[silversun]

SpydieNut said:

ok, but - why did he not only fail to take the OP's concerns seriously, but actually get aggressive?

also, why, if he's had vandelism etc, did he not say that was why the cameras were up.

even if it is innocent, he should restrict their field of vision to his own property.

God, I knew I was going to get grief for this. I'm not defending the guy, merely saying that painting him as a paedo without any evidence is wrong.

I have no idea why the guy got aggressive or why he didn't say what the cameras were for. I'm not psychic. On a speculative basis, someone who's in a serious neighbour dispute or been repeatedly targeted by vandals/thieves may be defensive and upset which was why he reacted badly. Which is why I suggested writing to him and explaining that his cameras are pointing into the OP's house and his daughter's bedroom and it's making them all uncomfortable, then asking him to redirect the cameras quoting any relevent piece of legislation.

Yes, I totally agree the field of vision should be restricted to how own property.

[Asterix]

Ecks Ridgehead said:

Asterix said:

...or put up a camera that watches his camera so you can record images of his camera, taken by your camera, looking in the wrong direction.

A-ha, so the watcher becomes the watchee...that's surveillancewang! I like your thinking.

It's either that or put up a huge parabolic mirror directing the sun's rays directly into the camera lens and blowing it up*

• The last bit might not happen but would be cool.

[fat tony]

There is no reason for his cameras to overlook anyones property. He is in very dodgy grounds. Cameras are supposed to point into your boundery not out. He should have checked for other suitable positions. Def go with getting your oh to speak to his. It works wonders. If it fails, police and council. In the mean time put up a big board across its view. Sure you could put a nice picture on it or a warning message?

[silversun]

I am going to change my reasonable and considered response.

Now I firmly believe your should nuke him from orbit.