Jetpacks - at last

Author
Discussion

OzzyR1

Original Poster:

5,736 posts

233 months

Friday 26th February 2010
quotequote all

And as if you couldn't guess, it's NZ, home of the adrenaline sports nutters who are behind it:

Want.



Flying into the future: New Zealand company to make personal jet packs

Martin Aircraft Company, in Christchurch, New Zealand, aims to make 500 packs a year which will sell for around £50,000.
The 200 horsepower dual-propeller packs are the brainchild of inventor Glenn Martin who unveiled his machine for the first time in July last year.

Because it weighs less than 254 pounds (115kg) the jet pack does not require a pilot's licence. It is capable of travelling 30 miles in 30 minutes on a full tank of fuel.

And recent tests have seen the newest model reach heights of up to 2,400 metres and top speeds of 60mph.

But only now has sufficient investment been found for the company to begin production of the craft, which will also begin at an undisclosed site outside New Zealand.

Martin Aircraft Company chief executive Richard Lauder said the pack could be perfect for the emergency services, private users and even the military. He said: "This could be life-saving stuff. For us this is an excellent commercial step."

Mr Lauder would not identify the partner other than to say it was an international aircraft company.

The joint venture would be run through a newly created company.

The aircraft company would have a controlling 51 per cent stake. Both Mr Lauder and jet pack inventor Glenn Martin would be directors of the new company.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australi...



And a video of testing:

http://www.martinjetpack.com/video-gallery.aspx


biggrin



ETA: Apologies if a repost, search function appears to be knackered again.



Edited by OzzyR1 on Friday 26th February 12:35

BliarOut

72,857 posts

240 months

Friday 26th February 2010
quotequote all
Wow, I watched the James May thing about jet packs, wonder how they've got over the control thing scratchchin

HundredthIdiot

4,414 posts

285 months

Friday 26th February 2010
quotequote all
Needs a gun platform.

Matt Evans

1,530 posts

175 months

Friday 26th February 2010
quotequote all
That's brilliant! Does anyone know what fuel it runs on? The website just says that it's a V4 engine, which a 5 US gallon capacity. Will it be run of the mill unleaded petrol?

BoRED S2upid

19,720 posts

241 months

Friday 26th February 2010
quotequote all
Does this mean someone is working on my hoverboard?

Schmeeky

4,192 posts

218 months

Friday 26th February 2010
quotequote all
Want!!! cloud9

st_files

5,427 posts

182 months

Friday 26th February 2010
quotequote all
Jesus....if ever there was a device made that was pretty much guaranteeing a huge accident almost every time you used it...why dont they just label them Darwins?

Schmeeky

4,192 posts

218 months

Friday 26th February 2010
quotequote all
^^^ No, they thought of that, and gave the guy a crash helmet. hehe

Actually, I believe you can get parachutes designed to save a microlight if the engines fail, maybe this thing would have a similar system?

Justayellowbadge

37,057 posts

243 months

Friday 26th February 2010
quotequote all
Cooler than polar bear porn.

neil_bolton

17,113 posts

265 months

Friday 26th February 2010
quotequote all
Not quiet mind.

Perfect biggrin

whitechief

4,423 posts

196 months

Friday 26th February 2010
quotequote all
I can see a lot of their customers spending the last few moments of their life screaming like a baby, before the inevitable.

soad

32,915 posts

177 months

Friday 26th February 2010
quotequote all
Heard about this on a radio yesterday.

Thought something similar was available years ago?
Cost something stupid, mind you - so limited appeal to potential buyers...

normalbloke

7,463 posts

220 months

Friday 26th February 2010
quotequote all
Ah, and there was me thinking it had a jet engine...

stefd

290 posts

229 months

Friday 26th February 2010
quotequote all

ProfessorPeach

616 posts

172 months

Friday 26th February 2010
quotequote all
Jesus, do you think it's big enough.

A bit disappointing, really.

I was hoping for something more like this:


normalbloke

7,463 posts

220 months

Friday 26th February 2010
quotequote all
stefd said:
Rockets, now we are talking....

shakotan

10,710 posts

197 months

Friday 26th February 2010
quotequote all
But it's not a jet pack, it's closer to a heli pack than a jet pack?

Matt Evans

1,530 posts

175 months

Friday 26th February 2010
quotequote all
shakotan said:
But it's not a jet pack, it's closer to a heli pack than a jet pack?
Martin Jet Packs website said:
Science
Science says that a Jet is a ‘coherent stream of particles moving in a parallel direction’.

This is why we talk about the ‘jet stream’ in the upper atmosphere. This is why a jet ski is called a jet ski. This is why a jet boat is called a jet boat. This is why the Coast Guard call their water jet powered craft ‘jet propelled’.

This is why our device is a jetpack. There is a coherent stream, all the engineering calculations, control calculations etc. are based on the fact that there is a jet of air exiting the fanjets.

Engineering
Many engineers, particularly in the aviation industry, make distinctions.

A gas turbine powered’ prop is not a jet but uses gas turbine calculations.

Whereas a gas turbine powered fan (turbo fan) they call a ‘jet’ in actuality it could more correctly be called a ‘gas turbine powered ducted fan’.


Common Usage
To most people a device that you strap on your back which burns fuel, makes noise and you fly around in, is a ‘jetpack’. The majority of people call the Bell Rocket Belt a ‘jetpack’.

Actually it is not what an engineer would call a jet, it is a rocket. However, by the science definition, the coherent stream of steam coming out of the nozzles is a ‘jet of steam’.
Edited by Matt Evans on Friday 26th February 13:22

TheDetailDoctor

8,782 posts

211 months

Friday 26th February 2010
quotequote all
That's the commuter hack sorted, cost "no more than a high end motorcycle".

Seriously, that really is a very good solution to personal transportation.

Perfect with it's range too, although I can see the Health & Safety womle here having a feild day if I tried to land it in the carpark.

Have lodged an enqury with them.

911motorsport

7,251 posts

234 months

Friday 26th February 2010
quotequote all
Aerial scooters.

I can picture lazy fat chavs buzzing around in these, like Watto out of Star Wars.

They'll be after these under the 'Mobility scheme'.