The Cyanide & Happiness appreciation thread

The Cyanide & Happiness appreciation thread

Author
Discussion

FN2TypeR

7,091 posts

94 months

Saturday 26th October 2019
quotequote all
rofl o lawd

Killer2005

19,656 posts

229 months

Sunday 27th October 2019
quotequote all
Teppic said:
rofl

Just catching up with this thread, I follow C&H on Facebook but not always followed on here as there's some I missed.

vixen1700

23,002 posts

271 months

Sunday 27th October 2019
quotequote all
boxst said:
Jesus! rofl

FN2TypeR

7,091 posts

94 months

Sunday 27th October 2019
quotequote all

NRS

22,195 posts

202 months

Monday 28th October 2019
quotequote all
boxst said:
I have a feeling there is a reference to someone/something I am missing...

jammy-git

29,778 posts

213 months

Monday 28th October 2019
quotequote all
NRS said:
boxst said:
I have a feeling there is a reference to someone/something I am missing...
I struggled with this one a little but I think it's as simple as the fact that she'd always fantasized about her husband being dead. I *think* the guy in the first two frames is role-playing the part of the doctor. I await my parrot...

Fastchas

2,649 posts

122 months

Monday 28th October 2019
quotequote all
jammy-git said:
NRS said:
boxst said:
I have a feeling there is a reference to someone/something I am missing...
I struggled with this one a little but I think it's as simple as the fact that she'd always fantasized about her husband being dead. I *think* the guy in the first two frames is role-playing the part of the doctor. I await my parrot...
Thats how I see it.
Look at her arms in the last picture. She is obviously excited!

Clockwork Cupcake

74,611 posts

273 months

Monday 28th October 2019
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Or simply "I fantasise about you being dead" (to her husband)

boxst

3,717 posts

146 months

Monday 28th October 2019
quotequote all
Clockwork Cupcake said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Or simply "I fantasise about you being dead" (to her husband)
I thought the second one, but the first one is mildly worse if that is possible smile

mikeveal

4,581 posts

251 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
Dave. said:
Some Gump said:
Some brilliant bits in this thread in the last few days!

SpeedMattersNot said:
I like it!

But...heat doesn't rise.
And there is this.

Of course it does you pedantic bellend! At least in any system that contains a gas and a gravitational field, (which is nearly all of them). Don't bring your niche physics cases to a c+h thread, you utter harpy.
Without turning this thread into a Junior School Physics lesson, I was always told that it was cold air that falls and pushes the warm air upwards.
Heat does not rise.
A hot gas or liquid will be less dense than the same gas at a lower temperature. So if you warm a bubble of gas, the denser (heavier) cooler gas will fall down and displace the bubble. The bubble of heated gas will rise as it is forced out of the way by the cooler gas.

A heated gas or fluid will rise in a mass of similar but cooler gas or fluid.

But heat itself does not rise. Consider a sphere of metal in a vacuum, heated from the centre. Would it be cooler at the top or the bottom, or would it have an even surface temperature?

jammy-git

29,778 posts

213 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
mikeveal said:
Heat does not rise.
A hot gas or liquid will be less dense than the same gas at a lower temperature. So if you warm a bubble of gas, the denser (heavier) cooler gas will fall down and displace the bubble. The bubble of heated gas will rise as it is forced out of the way by the cooler gas.

A heated gas or fluid will rise in a mass of similar but cooler gas or fluid.

But heat itself does not rise. Consider a sphere of metal in a vacuum, heated from the centre. Would it be cooler at the top or the bottom, or would it have an even surface temperature?
If you're going to be pedantic then you should probably steer clear of absolute statements.

Heat does rise. But only as a result of cooler substance falling.



Just out of curiosity. Not saying the above is false - but how does one prove that heat rises as a result of cooler substance falling, rather than the heat rising and displacing the cooler substance?

Gameface

16,565 posts

78 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
C&H is fun.

This conversation is not.

Teppic

7,367 posts

258 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all

GOATever

2,651 posts

68 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
Teppic said:
The guy in yellow really needed to remove the guy in green’s head with a sword, at the end, for authenticity.

kowalski655

14,656 posts

144 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
GOATever said:
The guy in yellow really needed to remove the guy in green’s head with a sword, at the end, for authenticity.
With HIS penis????eek

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
kowalski655 said:
GOATever said:
The guy in yellow really needed to remove the guy in green’s head with a sword, at the end, for authenticity.
With HIS penis????eek
Pork sword, obviously.

mikeveal

4,581 posts

251 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
jammy-git said:
Heat does rise. But only as a result of cooler substance falling.
banghead No, the heated substance rises. The temperature rise within a fixed heated body (one that doesn't move), with equal cooling on all surfaces would not be affected by gravity. That is to say, that heated body would have the same temperature at the top as at the bottom. It's really not difficult to comprehend.

Zippee

13,474 posts

235 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
mikeveal said:
jammy-git said:
Heat does rise. But only as a result of cooler substance falling.
banghead No, the heated substance rises. The temperature rise within a fixed heated body (one that doesn't move), with equal cooling on all surfaces would not be affected by gravity. That is to say, that heated body would have the same temperature at the top as at the bottom. It's really not difficult to comprehend.
Can you not take this to another thread rather than spoil this one?

slopes

38,831 posts

188 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
Zippee said:
mikeveal said:
jammy-git said:
Heat does rise. But only as a result of cooler substance falling.
banghead No, the heated substance rises. The temperature rise within a fixed heated body (one that doesn't move), with equal cooling on all surfaces would not be affected by gravity. That is to say, that heated body would have the same temperature at the top as at the bottom. It's really not difficult to comprehend.
Can you not take this to another thread rather than spoil this one?

Wiccan of Darkness

1,839 posts

84 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
Moving on to brighter and better things, my little lunchtime guilty pleasure of C&H shorts has now been exposed due to uncontrollable laughter as a result of this....

Cyanide and happiness Lab results

Plus it's so catchy..... (put the volume up)

At the risk of destroying the UK's GDP for this afternoon, here's a bonus clip. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-bhctkQUe4