30 somethings - are you going to vax?
Discussion
davey83 said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_A._McCulloug...
But a wack job nonetheless that has no idea what he's talking about
But a wack job nonetheless that has no idea what he's talking about
davey83 said:
Cardiologist, epidemiologist, a full professor of medicine at Texas A&M College of Medicine in Dallas.
So you made that up. Why? Is it complete ignorance of everything that you post about or there is more to it.
How bizarre.
It states "a professor at Texas A&M University" I've copied his bio from elsewhere.... What is the major discrepancy that harms his extensive knowledge base.....
So given his experience and career thus far, is he capable of reading and understanding scientific literature with regards to a cardiovascular disease? Yes or No
So given his experience and career thus far, is he capable of reading and understanding scientific literature with regards to a cardiovascular disease? Yes or No
davey83 said:
It states "a professor at Texas A&M University" I've copied his bio from elsewhere.... What is the major discrepancy that harms his extensive knowledge base.....
So given his experience and career thus far, is he capable of reading and understanding scientific literature with regards to a cardiovascular disease? Yes or No
I would say 'how do you not get this?', but, in your case, that would be a rather rhetorical question. I'll use short words, you have no idea what you are posting about and you are easily duped. Yes?So given his experience and career thus far, is he capable of reading and understanding scientific literature with regards to a cardiovascular disease? Yes or No
The fact that his previous employer needed to go to the courts to stop him from claiming that he's associated with them should tell you everything that you need to know about him. I have no doubt that he understands 'scientific literature, just as I have no doubt that he's a liar.
Between you and Lex, he came up with fraud, sorry, an 'acupuncturist' while you came up with certified liar. It's almost as if there is a pattern.
Saying that, you believe in chemtrails, so the above is rather expected.
davey83 said:
V6 Pushfit said:
davey83 said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_A._McCulloug...
But a wack job nonetheless that has no idea what he's talking about :
…as proved by Wikipedia, despite you posting earlier that he should be listened to.But a wack job nonetheless that has no idea what he's talking about :
Unbelievable.
And from the very Wikipedia page you posted:
Wikipedia said:
McCullough advocated for early treatment including hydroxychloroquine,criticized the response of the National Institutes of Health ….dissented from public health recommendations, and contributed to COVID-19 misinformation
Some of McCullough's public statements contributed to the spread of COVID-19 misinformation
McCullough testified before a committee of the Texas Senate in March 2021, posted to YouTube by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, in which he made false claims about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines, including that people under 50 years of age and survivors do not need the vaccine and that there is no evidence of asymptomatic spread of COVID-19.
Posted on the Canadian online video sharing platform Rumble, McCullough gave an interview in April 2021 to The New American, the magazine of the right-wing John Birch Society, in which he advanced anti-vaccination messaging, including falsely claiming tens of thousands of fatalities attributed to the COVID-19 vaccines.
In May 2021, McCullough gave an interview in which he made claims about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines which were "inaccurate, misleading and/or unsupported by evidence"…
It’s difficult to know wether you can’t read, don’t take anything in or are just incredibly easily conned.Some of McCullough's public statements contributed to the spread of COVID-19 misinformation
McCullough testified before a committee of the Texas Senate in March 2021, posted to YouTube by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, in which he made false claims about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines, including that people under 50 years of age and survivors do not need the vaccine and that there is no evidence of asymptomatic spread of COVID-19.
Posted on the Canadian online video sharing platform Rumble, McCullough gave an interview in April 2021 to The New American, the magazine of the right-wing John Birch Society, in which he advanced anti-vaccination messaging, including falsely claiming tens of thousands of fatalities attributed to the COVID-19 vaccines.
In May 2021, McCullough gave an interview in which he made claims about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines which were "inaccurate, misleading and/or unsupported by evidence"…
Either way you really need help as you’re making a fool out of yourself with every post.
You still believe McCulloughs opinions?? Yes or no?
Edited by anonymous-user on Monday 14th February 21:39
Yes, as I am also familiar with the term slander
I will no longer converse with you due to your deceitful nature, I wish you all the best.
davey83 said:
To learn involves making mistakes, what learning have you done with regards to COVID-19 since March 2020?
2 pages ago I asked you straight (and several other times) forward question and your verbal salad shuffle reply confirms you've not learnt a single thing about SARS cov2 in almost 2yrs. Now either your the unknown brightest hope mankind has on the matter of infectious respiratory diseases, OR you're a fraud. I will no longer converse with you due to your deceitful nature, I wish you all the best.
Edited by davey83 on Tuesday 15th February 07:25
jjlynn27 said:
It states "a professor at Texas A&M University" I've copied his bio from elsewhere.... What is the major discrepancy that harms his extensive knowledge base.....
So given his experience and career thus far, is he capable of reading and understanding scientific literature with regards to a cardiovascular disease? Yes or No
I would say 'how do you not get this?', but, in your case, that would be a rather rhetorical question. I'll use short words, you have no idea what you are posting about and you are easily duped. Yes?
The fact that his previous employer needed to go to the courts to stop him from claiming that he's associated with them should tell you everything that you need to know about him. I have no doubt that he understands 'scientific literature, just as I have no doubt that he's a liar.
Between you and Lex, he came up with fraud, sorry, an 'acupuncturist' while you came up with certified liar. It's almost as if there is a pattern.
Saying that, you believe in chemtrails, so the above is rather expected.
https://mark-skidmore.com/2021/08/04/dr-peter-mccu...
That's a contradiction if I ever heard on, that's for showing your hand in critical thinking. So given his experience and career thus far, is he capable of reading and understanding scientific literature with regards to a cardiovascular disease? Yes or No
I would say 'how do you not get this?', but, in your case, that would be a rather rhetorical question. I'll use short words, you have no idea what you are posting about and you are easily duped. Yes?
The fact that his previous employer needed to go to the courts to stop him from claiming that he's associated with them should tell you everything that you need to know about him. I have no doubt that he understands 'scientific literature, just as I have no doubt that he's a liar.
Between you and Lex, he came up with fraud, sorry, an 'acupuncturist' while you came up with certified liar. It's almost as if there is a pattern.
Saying that, you believe in chemtrails, so the above is rather expected.
https://mark-skidmore.com/2021/08/04/dr-peter-mccu...
You can't strip someone of something they didn't already have. It's not surprising an institute no longer wants to associated with an outspoken Dr. Regardless, does this discrepancy harm his already present extensive knowledge base? Yes or No and you've stated No, which means those things you may notice in your palms, they're straws.
Edited by davey83 on Tuesday 15th February 07:31
davey83 said:
That's a contradiction if I ever heard on, that's for showing your hand in critical thinking.
You can't strip someone of something they didn't already have. It's not surprising an institute no longer wants to associated with an outspoken Dr. Regardless, does this discrepancy harm his already present extensive knowledge base? Yes or No and you've stated No, which means those things you may notice in your palms, they're straws.
There is no contradiction. You shouldn't be using words that you don't understand. I'm not commenting on his knowledge. I'm commenting on his propensity to lie, just as much as I'm laughing at your inability to understand very simple concepts. I'll type this very slowly; he is not a professor of medicine @ tamu. You've copied @ pasted that as you have no cognitive abilities whatsoever. A simple repeater, if you like. That's why you, and people like you believe whatever garbage they are fed. You can't strip someone of something they didn't already have. It's not surprising an institute no longer wants to associated with an outspoken Dr. Regardless, does this discrepancy harm his already present extensive knowledge base? Yes or No and you've stated No, which means those things you may notice in your palms, they're straws.
Edited by davey83 on Tuesday 15th February 07:31
You are right about one thing. It isn't surprising that a company doesn't want to be associated with someone who doesn't work there.
Harrison Bergeron said:
Funny how no one has attacked the DM article about immunity through infection being better than the vaccines.
There is no need to 'attack the DM article'. Go to the original study that the 'article' refers to, read it, understand it (LOL), then come back and ask the question about it. You see, you are as bright as 'Boi', hence the choice of DM as your source of information is quite unsurprising.
jjlynn27 said:
There is no need to 'attack the DM article'. Go to the original study that the 'article' refers to, read it, understand it (LOL), then come back and ask the question about it.
You see, you are as bright as 'Boi', hence the choice of DM as your source of information is quite unsurprising.
Come on then professor shoot down the study. You see, you are as bright as 'Boi', hence the choice of DM as your source of information is quite unsurprising.
Harrison Bergeron said:
Come on then professor shoot down the study.
I'm not a professor, but I do understand that from your vantage point most people seem to be one. Like 'boi', you seem to need things repeated to you a few times; read the study, not just DM the article, do a 'research', and then ask yourself; 'Why did I pick this particular study, (or DM article), is it just because that I think it panders to my biases? Why is this particular study still not peer-reviewed, even though the pre-print was posted in August '21.'.
Please do come back.
jjlynn27 said:
I have no doubt that he understands 'scientific literature, just as I have no doubt that he's a liar.
Google "largest criminal fine in US history"Hypocrite
What peer reviewed study was carried out when the Pfizer CEO stated a 4th shot maybe needed due to omicron?....
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/08/omicron-pfizer-ceo...
Hypocrite
Show me a single peer reviewed study of a person receiving X2 mRNA vaccines, then later a booster mRNA then a flu jab while being challenged with sars cov2, to confirm the first part of this popular slogan 'safe and effective'
Hypocrite
Edited by davey83 on Tuesday 15th February 19:45
davey83 said:
Google "largest criminal fine in US history"
Hypocrite
What peer reviewed study was carried out when the Pfizer CEO stated a 4th shot maybe needed due to omicron?....
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/08/omicron-pfizer-ceo...
Hypocrite
Show me a single peer reviewed study of a person receiving X2 mRNA vaccines, then later a booster mRNA then a flu jab while being challenged with sars cov2, to confirm the first part of this popular slogan 'safe and effective'
Hypocrite
You’ve been posting misunderstood rubbish and links to so many loons for so long now it’s staggering you think your posts are worthy of response. More fool me for even bothering to post this. Hypocrite
What peer reviewed study was carried out when the Pfizer CEO stated a 4th shot maybe needed due to omicron?....
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/08/omicron-pfizer-ceo...
Hypocrite
Show me a single peer reviewed study of a person receiving X2 mRNA vaccines, then later a booster mRNA then a flu jab while being challenged with sars cov2, to confirm the first part of this popular slogan 'safe and effective'
Hypocrite
Edited by davey83 on Tuesday 15th February 19:45
davey83 said:
Google "largest criminal fine in US history"
Hypocrite
What peer reviewed study was carried out when the Pfizer CEO stated a 4th shot maybe needed due to omicron?....
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/08/omicron-pfizer-ceo...
Hypocrite
Show me a single peer reviewed study of a person receiving X2 mRNA vaccines, then later a booster mRNA then a flu jab while being challenged with sars cov2, to confirm the first part of this popular slogan 'safe and effective'
Hypocrite
You seem overly excited by me pointing out that your leading light is a liar as determined by the courts. Hypocrite
What peer reviewed study was carried out when the Pfizer CEO stated a 4th shot maybe needed due to omicron?....
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/08/omicron-pfizer-ceo...
Hypocrite
Show me a single peer reviewed study of a person receiving X2 mRNA vaccines, then later a booster mRNA then a flu jab while being challenged with sars cov2, to confirm the first part of this popular slogan 'safe and effective'
Hypocrite
Edited by davey83 on Tuesday 15th February 19:45
That is ok, with your education and cognitive abilities, it's rather expected. You can't even figure out how to check the veracity of the source, chances of you understanding any study are pretty much non-existent.
'professor of medicine @ tamu' lol, still funny how easily manipulated you are.
V6 Pushfit said:
davey83 said:
V6 Pushfit said:
davey83 said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_A._McCulloug...
But a wack job nonetheless that has no idea what he's talking about :
…as proved by Wikipedia, despite you posting earlier that he should be listened to.But a wack job nonetheless that has no idea what he's talking about :
Unbelievable.
And from the very Wikipedia page you posted:
Wikipedia said:
McCullough advocated for early treatment including hydroxychloroquine,criticized the response of the National Institutes of Health ….dissented from public health recommendations, and contributed to COVID-19 misinformation
Some of McCullough's public statements contributed to the spread of COVID-19 misinformation
McCullough testified before a committee of the Texas Senate in March 2021, posted to YouTube by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, in which he made false claims about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines, including that people under 50 years of age and survivors do not need the vaccine and that there is no evidence of asymptomatic spread of COVID-19.
Posted on the Canadian online video sharing platform Rumble, McCullough gave an interview in April 2021 to The New American, the magazine of the right-wing John Birch Society, in which he advanced anti-vaccination messaging, including falsely claiming tens of thousands of fatalities attributed to the COVID-19 vaccines.
In May 2021, McCullough gave an interview in which he made claims about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines which were "inaccurate, misleading and/or unsupported by evidence"…
It’s difficult to know wether you can’t read, don’t take anything in or are just incredibly easily conned.Some of McCullough's public statements contributed to the spread of COVID-19 misinformation
McCullough testified before a committee of the Texas Senate in March 2021, posted to YouTube by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, in which he made false claims about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines, including that people under 50 years of age and survivors do not need the vaccine and that there is no evidence of asymptomatic spread of COVID-19.
Posted on the Canadian online video sharing platform Rumble, McCullough gave an interview in April 2021 to The New American, the magazine of the right-wing John Birch Society, in which he advanced anti-vaccination messaging, including falsely claiming tens of thousands of fatalities attributed to the COVID-19 vaccines.
In May 2021, McCullough gave an interview in which he made claims about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines which were "inaccurate, misleading and/or unsupported by evidence"…
Either way you really need help as you’re making a fool out of yourself with every post.
You still believe McCulloughs opinions?? Yes or no?
Edited by V6 Pushfit on Monday 14th February 21:39
chemtrails not real..... really ?
Gassing Station | Health Matters | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff