Why not pay teenage girls to have a contraceptive implant?

Why not pay teenage girls to have a contraceptive implant?

Author
Discussion

Martial Arts Man

Original Poster:

6,601 posts

187 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
Just flicked onto Jeremy Kyle, and as usual, within 30 seconds my blood was boiling with indignant rage.

Anyway, it got me thinking, what can we do about all these pikeys spewing out babies left right and centre?

Clearly, reforming benefits etc is not going to happen under any political party's governance. Education doesn't seem to be working either.

So why not offer a lump sum, I dunno, maybe a few hundred quid to all those who choose to have an implant at 15?

I realise that the % of women having kids at this age is small, so the cost would be high to implement this scheme.

There must be a way of targetting this incentive scheme, even if it was just initially offered to those whose parents receive benefits or those on school meal lists in order to test its efficacy.


Prevention is better than cure after all.


So, wise sages, what are the flaws or unintended consequences of my system?

Tony*T3

20,911 posts

248 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
Implant at 15? What, just after their third sprog.....????

wink


i like the idea.

Gargamel

15,023 posts

262 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all

If Teenage girls see having babies on the state as a lifestyle option then they will continue to do that. Meantime, girls that never intended to start a family at 15 will take the implant and cost you your few hundred quid, thus you end up paying twice.

Also, given that some girls are 14 or 15 when the conceive, how young would a teenager be to qualify ? Can you imagine the reaction if 14 year old girls are sexualised in this way ?



JJCW

2,449 posts

187 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
A shotgun would work better, very effective.

Eddh

4,656 posts

193 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
Martial Arts Man said:
So, wise sages, what are the flaws or unintended consequences of my system?
Yes why should I a tax paying person with a job pay for some free-loader who can't keep their legs closed to have an implant?

This would just encourage them to have unprotected sex 'coz I can't get preggers aint it!'. Meaning they will all catch AIDS and die... wait I think you might be onto something...

Plotloss

67,280 posts

271 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
Because the implants have issues in some people.

It would be far easier and cheaper to put cyanide in the s'ghetti 'oops and knock out the entire social class.

onlynik

3,979 posts

194 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
How about contraception for everyone on teh dole.

They aren't contributing to society, so why let them bring another mouth to feed in to this world.

And on that note, why don't we give vouchers for food instead of money. If folk on the dole want to drink and smoke they can get a bloody job.

Edited by onlynik on Thursday 2nd April 16:24

Sheets Tabuer

19,076 posts

216 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
It would fail under discrimination laws as it only applied to females.

You also have to look at the benefits for expectant mothers they include:

Housing benefit
Council tax benefit
£190 Health pregnancy grant
Income support
+ many others I didn't list

So lets say for instance that comes to £600 a month in benefit, you'd have to pay them more than that to have the implant to make it worth their while.

Martial Arts Man

Original Poster:

6,601 posts

187 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
Eddh said:
Yes why should I a tax paying person with a job pay for some free-loader who can't keep their legs closed to have an implant?
I don't know how much it would cost, but when you think of all the time and money that it costs in terms of Doctors, Midwives, Benefits, Social Housing at the moment, even if it cost the same or a little more, it would be worth it.

We are developing a seriously bottom heavy society. Just countering that phenomena would be worth paying the price. In my opinion, of course.

I believe that incentives are the only way to change behaviour, irrespective of how repugnant the said behaviour may be to you or I.

ZeeTacoe

5,444 posts

223 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
Gargamel said:
If Teenage girls see having babies on the state as a lifestyle option then they will continue to do that. Meantime, girls that never intended to start a family at 15 will take the implant and cost you your few hundred quid, thus you end up paying twice.
If? Most of the lower set mouth breathers already discus baby making as a future career during their GCSEs.

Martial Arts Man

Original Poster:

6,601 posts

187 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
Sheets Tabuer said:
It would fail under discrimination laws as it only applied to females.

You also have to look at the benefits for expectant mothers they include:

Housing benefit
Council tax benefit
£190 Health pregnancy grant
Income support
+ many others I didn't list

So lets say for instance that comes to £600 a month in benefit, you'd have to pay them more than that to have the implant to make it worth their while.
That's a fair point.

My assumption is that most teenage mothers don't really wish to be. May be a big flaw there.

G'kar

3,728 posts

187 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
ZeeTacoe said:
Gargamel said:
If Teenage girls see having babies on the state as a lifestyle option then they will continue to do that. Meantime, girls that never intended to start a family at 15 will take the implant and cost you your few hundred quid, thus you end up paying twice.
If? Most of the lower set mouth breathers already discus baby making as a future career during their GCSEs.
I blame labour. It's why they call them 'Brahn babies'.

ben_reza

412 posts

183 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
talk about a slippery slope!

we give them condoms for free, and they can get the implant for free.
That should be easy enough.

Martial Arts Man

Original Poster:

6,601 posts

187 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
How's about using my idea as the carrot, with the stick being total reform of the benefit system for all future claimants.


Martial Arts Man

Original Poster:

6,601 posts

187 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
ben_reza said:
talk about a slippery slope!

we give them condoms for free, and they can get the implant for free.
That should be easy enough.
Yeah, but at the moment we pay them to have children.

That's the bottom of the slope, surely?

Plotloss

67,280 posts

271 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
Trouble is, Hitler gave the noble pursuit of eugenics a rather bad name.

You'd need to get a great marketing firm on board.

ehonda

1,483 posts

206 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
Slight diversion - one of the pieces of graffiti still on the Bank of England reads 'Jeremy Kyle is a D*ck*' biggrin

Sisyphus

498 posts

217 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
There must be some way to spray council estates with enough microwage radiation to render the wasters sterile surely.

V8mate

45,899 posts

190 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
Trouble is, Hitler gave the noble pursuit of eugenics a rather bad name.

You'd need to get a great marketing firm on board.
Hitler?

He got the idea from the Americans. And they continued with it until 1970!

It's always the Germans who get the blame hehe


O/T The 'Nazi salute' was another American invention (youth groups) copied by the Germans

G'kar

3,728 posts

187 months

Thursday 2nd April 2009
quotequote all
V8mate said:
Plotloss said:
Trouble is, Hitler gave the noble pursuit of eugenics a rather bad name.

You'd need to get a great marketing firm on board.
Hitler?

He got the idea from the Americans. And they continued with it until 1970!

It's always the Germans who get the blame hehe


O/T The 'Nazi salute' was another American invention (youth groups) copied by the Germans
So, what you're admitting, is they were not only evil genocidal fks, but also plagarists?