Training heart rate.
Discussion
mcelliott said:
garyhun said:
Your max rate should be approx 220 - your age = 191. So you're OK but operating near the max.
Fat loss exercise is around 75-85% of that = 143-162.
There are more accurate formulas but that's a good basic look at what you should be doing.
I really would not worry about what your perceived maximum heart rate is, especially using the above formula, which is no longer used anyway.Fat loss exercise is around 75-85% of that = 143-162.
There are more accurate formulas but that's a good basic look at what you should be doing.
I train with Commonwealth Games standard cyclists, and many of their maximum heart rates vary from 178 - 210, regardless of age.
If you want to find out your maximum heart rate, there is the VO2 test, whereby (under medical supervision) you run for a specific amount of time on a treadmill increasing the effort every few minutes, for a timed period, until you have reached your maximum threshold....not a pleasant experience by the way.
mcelliott said:
garyhun said:
Your max rate should be approx 220 - your age = 191. So you're OK but operating near the max.
Fat loss exercise is around 75-85% of that = 143-162.
There are more accurate formulas but that's a good basic look at what you should be doing.
I really would not worry about what your perceived maximum heart rate is, especially using the above formula, which is no longer used anyway.Fat loss exercise is around 75-85% of that = 143-162.
There are more accurate formulas but that's a good basic look at what you should be doing.
I train with Commonwealth Games standard cyclists, and many of their maximum heart rates vary from 178 - 210, regardless of age
ewenm said:
mcelliott said:
garyhun said:
Your max rate should be approx 220 - your age = 191. So you're OK but operating near the max.
Fat loss exercise is around 75-85% of that = 143-162.
There are more accurate formulas but that's a good basic look at what you should be doing.
I really would not worry about what your perceived maximum heart rate is, especially using the above formula, which is no longer used anyway.Fat loss exercise is around 75-85% of that = 143-162.
There are more accurate formulas but that's a good basic look at what you should be doing.
I train with Commonwealth Games standard cyclists, and many of their maximum heart rates vary from 178 - 210, regardless of age.
If you want to find out your maximum heart rate, there is the VO2 test, whereby (under medical supervision) you run for a specific amount of time on a treadmill increasing the effort every few minutes, for a timed period, until you have reached your maximum threshold....not a pleasant experience by the way.
Would running at a slower pace aerobically and building the pace higher and higher reach a peak heart rate more than running to exhaustion would....hmmm
Wouldn't lactate start to become more present at the point where you are at your peak heart rate and your body is at its limit for supplying oxygen so it has to start using a different energy system to keep up.
Interesting...
bales said:
Interesing point, can your heart rate peak higher than at a point where your running fully anaerobically and on your lactic system?
Would running at a slower pace aerobically and building the pace higher and higher reach a peak heart rate more than running to exhaustion would....hmmm
Wouldn't lactate start to become more present at the point where you are at your peak heart rate and your body is at its limit for supplying oxygen so it has to start using a different energy system to keep up.
Interesting...
I believe what you want is a sports science degree!Would running at a slower pace aerobically and building the pace higher and higher reach a peak heart rate more than running to exhaustion would....hmmm
Wouldn't lactate start to become more present at the point where you are at your peak heart rate and your body is at its limit for supplying oxygen so it has to start using a different energy system to keep up.
Interesting...
http://www3.open.ac.uk/study/undergraduate/qualifi...
You're interested...fill your boots.
bales said:
ewenm said:
mcelliott said:
garyhun said:
Your max rate should be approx 220 - your age = 191. So you're OK but operating near the max.
Fat loss exercise is around 75-85% of that = 143-162.
There are more accurate formulas but that's a good basic look at what you should be doing.
I really would not worry about what your perceived maximum heart rate is, especially using the above formula, which is no longer used anyway.Fat loss exercise is around 75-85% of that = 143-162.
There are more accurate formulas but that's a good basic look at what you should be doing.
I train with Commonwealth Games standard cyclists, and many of their maximum heart rates vary from 178 - 210, regardless of age.
If you want to find out your maximum heart rate, there is the VO2 test, whereby (under medical supervision) you run for a specific amount of time on a treadmill increasing the effort every few minutes, for a timed period, until you have reached your maximum threshold....not a pleasant experience by the way.
Would running at a slower pace aerobically and building the pace higher and higher reach a peak heart rate more than running to exhaustion would....hmmm
Wouldn't lactate start to become more present at the point where you are at your peak heart rate and your body is at its limit for supplying oxygen so it has to start using a different energy system to keep up.
Interesting...
Plus, I absolutely detest treadmills, so probably some psychological barrier there too.
Thanks for those who have provided advice and support and to those who refer to me as a troll or whatever it is… go jump! If you don’t like the post then go elsewhere.
Measured my pulse: 10sec counts 10 beats. 60bpm. Its varied between 66bpm when I was younger to 60ish now.
My heart rate hits 182ish when I am running for the first 10 minutes at 8kph (the first 5 minutes will prob be at 165ish bpm and then starts to rise to 180+ bpm). I am not a comfortable runner and find it hard to run for a long period of time. After 10 mins I slow it down to 7.5kph for 5 minutes and sometime stop or go for another 5 mins at 6.5kph. My heart rate drops to 160ish when I am jogging at 6.5kph.
When I was training with my personal trainer 6 months ago he managed to get me down to 14.5st from 16.5st in 3 months. Also he said I am poor on things like running but good for short distance rowing machine bursts. My arms and chest were weak but I am good at lifting using my legs. There was a lot to work on but overall he was happy with my progress in 3 months.
Right now I have stop the silly Maximuscle diet. Using the powder as simply supplements.
Measured my pulse: 10sec counts 10 beats. 60bpm. Its varied between 66bpm when I was younger to 60ish now.
My heart rate hits 182ish when I am running for the first 10 minutes at 8kph (the first 5 minutes will prob be at 165ish bpm and then starts to rise to 180+ bpm). I am not a comfortable runner and find it hard to run for a long period of time. After 10 mins I slow it down to 7.5kph for 5 minutes and sometime stop or go for another 5 mins at 6.5kph. My heart rate drops to 160ish when I am jogging at 6.5kph.
When I was training with my personal trainer 6 months ago he managed to get me down to 14.5st from 16.5st in 3 months. Also he said I am poor on things like running but good for short distance rowing machine bursts. My arms and chest were weak but I am good at lifting using my legs. There was a lot to work on but overall he was happy with my progress in 3 months.
Right now I have stop the silly Maximuscle diet. Using the powder as simply supplements.
superkartracer said:
ewenm, how old are you? 21kph is very fast
33. 20kph for 5k (so 15 mins for a 5k) is my standard for "fit", and then I work from there to improve further. 21kph is 2:51 per km, and my 3k best is 8:19 so 21.6kph for those few minutes. World marathon record of ~2:04 is an average of 21.09kph or 2:50.7 per km.The key to marathon training is increasing your lactate threshold, so you can run at a slightly faster speed without building much lactate in your muscles. It takes lots of miles at that pace to train your body like that, sadly
Edit: Back on topic - having a high heart rate when doing some relatively modest aerobic exercise suggests that the aerobic fitness is poor and needs work (if you care about that). Even when I'm doing my (pathetic) weights sessions, I include 30mins of aerobic work afterwards.
Edited by ewenm on Wednesday 27th January 14:24
Not trying to pick holes, but rather help and increase your knowledge...
Day 1: Legs + cardio
Day 2: Back + cardio
Day 3: Chest + cardio
HTH
aabbaa1980 said:
My training consists of:
-15-20minute run at 8kmph
-20mins cross trainner
-12*5 50kg lifts on the thights (sitting down machine where you raise legs to lift weights)
Leg Extensions only target the quadriceps (the big muscles on the front of your thighs). If your gym has a leg press machine, try that too - as well as the quads it also involes your glutes (your backside - and the biggest muscle in the body).
-12*5 40kg lac weights machine which as a bar you pull down.
Lat, not lac. Short for Latissimus Dorsi.
- 12*5 80kg pulling of weights when sitting down. works out chect and arms.
-12*5 40kg tri-cip machine.
Tricep, not tri-cip
You're doing nothing at all for your chest, another large muscle group - get on the bench press machine, man!
Takes me 1.5+ hrs and i do it twice/3 times a week.
You'd be better splitting the workout if you want the best from it. Ideally you don't do cardio and weights together, but for most people that's unrealistic. If you're doing cardio and weights in the same session you should do the weitghts first. Something like this would be a better split, and give your muscles enough time to recover properly...-15-20minute run at 8kmph
-20mins cross trainner
-12*5 50kg lifts on the thights (sitting down machine where you raise legs to lift weights)
Leg Extensions only target the quadriceps (the big muscles on the front of your thighs). If your gym has a leg press machine, try that too - as well as the quads it also involes your glutes (your backside - and the biggest muscle in the body).
-12*5 40kg lac weights machine which as a bar you pull down.
Lat, not lac. Short for Latissimus Dorsi.
- 12*5 80kg pulling of weights when sitting down. works out chect and arms.
-12*5 40kg tri-cip machine.
Tricep, not tri-cip
You're doing nothing at all for your chest, another large muscle group - get on the bench press machine, man!
Takes me 1.5+ hrs and i do it twice/3 times a week.
Day 1: Legs + cardio
Day 2: Back + cardio
Day 3: Chest + cardio
HTH
BliarOut said:
pmanson said:
Are those heart rate monitors any good?
Like the OP I have similar health issues in my family and my chloestral is high.
I'm 5ft 7 and currently weighing in at 14 stone.
I've been back in the gym since the New Year and feel much better but I'm not convinced the weight is coming off as wuickly as possible.
Part of this is probably me not working myself hard enough (something I have been rectifying over the last couple of weeks).
I try and swim a couple of times a week and then get into the gym for some resistance training either once or twice a week.
I've also been trying to drink as much water as possible which helping with my hunger and watching what I eat.
I know it's not an over night process but i'm enjoying it!
I'll let you know in a few days, I've got a waterproof gps enabled one coming for my birthday on Thursday. This should be fun!Like the OP I have similar health issues in my family and my chloestral is high.
I'm 5ft 7 and currently weighing in at 14 stone.
I've been back in the gym since the New Year and feel much better but I'm not convinced the weight is coming off as wuickly as possible.
Part of this is probably me not working myself hard enough (something I have been rectifying over the last couple of weeks).
I try and swim a couple of times a week and then get into the gym for some resistance training either once or twice a week.
I've also been trying to drink as much water as possible which helping with my hunger and watching what I eat.
I know it's not an over night process but i'm enjoying it!
Current (poor) stats;
Age: 27
Height: 5ft 7
Weight: 91 kilos (i've put on three pounds this year even though i'm exercising more)
BP: 137/81
And the killer for me a body fat % of over 39%!
Making my BMI - 31 or something
This is the big kick up the arse that I have needed and the new plan has split my gym session up it to managable sessions. I've got a follow up session in three weeks.
superkartracer said:
And the killer for me a body fat % of over 39%! !!
You need to sort that Sir
Don't worry I am! You need to sort that Sir
I've never been a skinny bloke but frankly this is ridiculus and scares me.
My goals are:
- Reduce waist for 36" to 32"
- Improve general fitness
- Lower BP/Cholestral
- Get down to 12 stone
- Having more energy
- Improve my general health
An old house mate is getting married at the end of July so I hope to be well on my way to my target by then.
I might need (and fully expect) a good kicking by you guys on a regular basis if I start slacking.
Edited by pmanson on Friday 29th January 09:33
Munter said:
pmanson said:
I might need (and fully expect) a good kicking by you guys on a regular basis if I start slacking.
I wonder if like the PHat PHighters thread we could do with a 2010 Gym Bunnies thread......basically just to give you a kicking
If any of you guys go to the Tiddenfoot gym in Leighton Buzzard let me know
Gassing Station | Health Matters | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff