Who will get the sack first, Boas or Rogers?

Who will get the sack first, Boas or Rogers?

Author
Discussion

jcremonini

2,099 posts

167 months

Sunday 19th August 2012
quotequote all
essexplumber said:
dxbtiger said:
achieved the absolute impossible as a caretaker manager last year by seeing off the best football team I've ever seen for the champs league.
Cost £1bn.
Actually plumber - Chelsea net spending in the last decade is 515m. As a comparison Spurs is 235m. Source: http://www.sportingintelligence.com/wp-content/upl...

Do you want me to workd out the £ per trophy comparison or will you be man enough to do it for me and post it here ?

Oh - and if you want to bring net spending in the the last 5 years only then you will find we are neck and neck - http://forum.football.co.uk/about433618.html . Perhaps you could work out the £ per trophy on that one too ?

I won't hold my breath though.

Your hatred of Chelsea seems to have impacted your brain.

Spurs - the very silent (because they've wasted it all) 3rd most transfer spending happy club in English football.

I think I might just have to do what you like doing and visit the Spurs forum to shut you up......

CIE560

18,782 posts

193 months

Sunday 19th August 2012
quotequote all
Hopefully neither as managers need time. It's bad for the game when managers are sacked quickly.

curlie467

7,650 posts

201 months

Sunday 19th August 2012
quotequote all
Neither will get sacked during this season or before next season starts.

Di Matteo on the other hand, he has the stty job.

essexplumber

7,751 posts

173 months

Sunday 19th August 2012
quotequote all
jcremonini said:
Actually plumber - Chelsea net spending in the last decade is 515m. As a comparison Spurs is 235m. Source: http://www.sportingintelligence.com/wp-content/upl...

Do you want me to workd out the £ per trophy comparison or will you be man enough to do it for me and post it here ?

Oh - and if you want to bring net spending in the the last 5 years only then you will find we are neck and neck - http://forum.football.co.uk/about433618.html . Perhaps you could work out the £ per trophy on that one too ?

I won't hold my breath though.

Your hatred of Chelsea seems to have impacted your brain.

Spurs - the very silent (because they've wasted it all) 3rd most transfer spending happy club in English football.

I think I might just have to do what you like doing and visit the Spurs forum to shut you up......
Wages, wages, wages.....What about fking wages? Do Spurs pay players silly amounts of money? No, not compared to Chavski.

Our net spend on transfers may be high but how much of that is down to the likes of Chavs, Citeh and Utd inflating the amounts clubs and agents think their players are worth.

Daniel Levy has stuck to a stict wage cap at Spurs for a long time, hence we are a stable and sustainable outfit.

Also you haven't and wouldn't be able to shut me up, your opinion, like mine, counts for fk all.

BrabusMog

20,165 posts

186 months

Sunday 19th August 2012
quotequote all
I will try and find the article but I'm on my phone at the moment but Spurs spent either double or triple what Arsenal did from when Wenger took over til the end of that unbeaten season they had. And that's not net spend etc, just physical cash laid out on players. Even taking wages into account wouldnt level the field if Arsenal were spending loads on that. So, you're argument looks a tad hypocritical. And that was also before Chelsea and City fell into cash.

Edited by BrabusMog on Sunday 19th August 11:34

CIE560

18,782 posts

193 months

Sunday 19th August 2012
quotequote all
BrabusMog said:
I will try and find the article but I'm on my phone at the moment but Spurs spent either double or triple what Arsenal did from when Wenger took over til the end of that unbeaten season they had. And that's not net spend etc, just physical cash laid out on players. Even taking wages into account wouldnt level the field if Arsenal were spending loads on that. So, you're argument looks a tad hypocritical. And that was also before Chelsea and City fell into cash.

Edited by BrabusMog on Sunday 19th August 11:34
He won't be having any of that. Spurs can only do right.

Trophybloo

1,207 posts

187 months

Sunday 19th August 2012
quotequote all
AVB before Christmas!!

dxbtiger

Original Poster:

4,389 posts

173 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
curlie467 said:
Neither will get sacked during this season or before next season starts.

Di Matteo on the other hand, he has the stty job.
Still sticking with that?

AVB by 1/1/13 I reckon.

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
Mark Hughes first. By the time time the teams gelled they will be too far gone to be saved!

Booey

7,573 posts

180 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
Boas.

curlie467

7,650 posts

201 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
dxbtiger said:
curlie467 said:
Neither will get sacked during this season or before next season starts.

Di Matteo on the other hand, he has the stty job.
Still sticking with that?

AVB by 1/1/13 I reckon.
No, I am going to change to none of them getting sacked before the end of the season.

Jw Vw

4,831 posts

163 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
Boas is beautifully fking Spurs up at present - he'll go first, around November time.

baz1985

3,598 posts

245 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
tux said:
Mark Hughes first. By the time time the teams gelled they will be too far gone to be saved!
Finding a club that matches his ambition appears to be his perpetual problem!

Jw Vw

4,831 posts

163 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
baz1985 said:
tux said:
Mark Hughes first. By the time time the teams gelled they will be too far gone to be saved!
Finding a club that matches his ambition appears to be his perpetual problem!
hehe

Cheib

23,251 posts

175 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
I think AVB is the one most at risk.....Rogers was brilliant at Swansea last year and that buys him a lot more time in my opinion that AVB's work at Porto.

I also have heard pretty much from the horse's mouth some stories about how AVB managed Chelsea last year....it's no secret that he lost the dressing room but frankly his man management was utterly appalling from what I know. He's not one for explaining to players why or why they aren't being picked......maybe he thought he had such a strong power base that he was untouchable and didn't need to.....he's a fool though if he thought Abramovich wouldn't fire him if things weren't going well.

I was very surprised when RDM got the job full time at Chelsea but they have a very good squad now...their midfield is just unbelievable strong. I don't like saying it but I think Chelsea will do well this year. Fergie made me laugh when he compared his current striking option to the 99 side....just bks. It was the midfield which won that treble for Utd.....Giggs, Scholes, Keane and Beckham vs two strikers from Cole, Sheringham, Solskaer and Dwight Yorke. That midfield was world class....those strikers weren't. Midfields win you trophies.

andyjo1982

4,960 posts

210 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
tux said:
Mark Hughes first. By the time time the teams gelled they will be too far gone to be saved!
I really hope you're right.

Though I have to agree with AVB comments on here. Rodgers hasn't done himself any favours either. AVB and BR seem to be in direct competition to see who can ps off their own fans the most.

And the poster above talking about midfields talks a lot of sense too.

andyjo1982

4,960 posts

210 months

Saturday 1st September 2012
quotequote all
Just checked the oddschecker next manager leaving market
Nigel Adkins 7/2
Hughes 9/2
Allardice - 6/1
AVB - 6/1
Tony Pulis - 10/1

Very surprised to see Big Sam is 3rd fav. 2 wins out of 3, and now the big target man that will fit Sam's system well.