So... Black players union?

So... Black players union?

Author
Discussion

Booey

7,573 posts

181 months

Friday 26th October 2012
quotequote all
Good point Essex. Why did Rio get Cole's race involved?

RedTrident

8,290 posts

236 months

Friday 26th October 2012
quotequote all
essexplumber said:
RedTrident said:
Well being someone who has been referred to as both choc ice and coconut by other black people I considered it to be an insult questioning my authenticity as a black person.

As to it being racist, yes I agree but it sure isn't an anti white term as suggested. I've always considered to be comparable to being called a 'sell out'
But by being a "choc-ice" is the slur not hinting at you being too white? As if it were a bad thing to be white.

That is racist, full stop. If I call a white person a "wigger" or "jafakan" for acting black am I not saying that being black is a bad thing?
I'm not disputing its not racist. But at best its a stretch if you think that a black man being called a choc ice is racist towards a white person.

The slur isn't that someone is too white, rather that they are forgetting their blackness. Yes its subtle but the emphasis is on the later and I've never witnessed it as a racist insult towards white people.


essexplumber

7,751 posts

174 months

Friday 26th October 2012
quotequote all
RedTrident said:
I'm not disputing its not racist. But at best its a stretch if you think that a black man being called a choc ice is racist towards a white person.

The slur isn't that someone is too white, rather that they are forgetting their blackness. Yes its subtle but the emphasis is on the later and I've never witnessed it as a racist insult towards white people.
Are you white? Please don't answer that if you'd rather not but I do find it offensive (as a white man) and I do honestly belive that "choc-ice" is equaly offensive to a white person as a black person.

After all is said and done race related insults don't have to just offend the person they're aimed at but I also belive that between freinds some racially active banter can be taken light heartedly (sp). If a black mate said something along the lines of "you effing white boys are all the same....." I wouldn't take that as an insult, if a black man said that to me and I didn't know hime well enough I would be offended.

What I am trying to say is that I am sure neither JT or RF or Suarez etc are real racists, I don't really think anyone with reasonable intelligence levels are reall, genuinely racist. But as JT's remarks were taken so seriously I can't see how RF's remarks were not. It smacks of double standards, just as a black players union would fly in the face of genuine attempts to eradicate racist elements in football and society in general. You cannot fight discrimination with tools that discriminate.

TwigtheWonderkid

43,405 posts

151 months

Friday 26th October 2012
quotequote all
essexplumber said:
What I am trying to say is that I am sure neither JT or RF or Suarez etc are real racists, I don't really think anyone with reasonable intelligence levels are really, genuinely racist.
I'm not sure your comment about reasonable intelligence gets Terry off the hook. I think he's a very good footballer, but he wouldn't be my "phone a friend" on Who Wants To Be A Millionaire.

I doubt Terry is a racist. He's played with too many black players who surely would have noticed and outed him if he were. In fact there is no law against being a racist. We don't have thought crime in this country. So long as you stay within the law, don't racially abuse people or incite racial hatred, you can believe in whatever vile nonsense you choose.

Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

150 months

Friday 26th October 2012
quotequote all
It's a known unknown as Donald Rumsfeld might say.

What we can say for sure is John Terry is a .

TheHeretic

Original Poster:

73,668 posts

256 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
So now the Rooney Rule is being touted? rolleyes

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/20123376

Bandwagon.

mikemc88

302 posts

155 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
Wenger's made some good comments on this.
http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11670/8194...

Jobs should be given on merit. Why should someone be considered for a job if they are not in the top 3 applicants, but are a certain ethnicity so included anyway.

Negative Creep

24,989 posts

228 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
What's the point? Surely if the people doing the hiring really are racist they wouldn't employ you regardless of whether you had an interview or not

ArtVandelay

6,689 posts

185 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
TheHeretic said:
So now the Rooney Rule is being touted? rolleyes

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/20123376

Bandwagon.
It's racism in a different way, pro-black people for no other reason than that they're black. You shouldn't have to meet a quota.

Race shouldn't matter, Paul Ince was sacked from Blackburn because he did a ste job, in the same season, several white managers were sacked for the same reason.

As AW says, jobs should be given on merit.


Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

150 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
ArtVandelay said:
As AW says, jobs should be given on merit.
I agree entirely. Odd then how with such a high number of black players in the Prem & below, I can think of Chris Hughton & poor Terry Connor managing in the top echelon in the last year. For some reason, they're not coming through post retirement in anything like the numbers you would expect given the representation at playing level. Question is, what is the reason?

TheHeretic

Original Poster:

73,668 posts

256 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
Justin Cyder said:
I agree entirely. Odd then how with such a high number of black players in the Prem & below, I can think of Chris Hughton & poor Terry Connor managing in the top echelon in the last year. For some reason, they're not coming through post retirement in anything like the numbers you would expect given the representation at playing level. Question is, what is the reason?
Does it have to involve their colour?

OllieC

3,816 posts

215 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
TheHeretic said:
Justin Cyder said:
I agree entirely. Odd then how with such a high number of black players in the Prem & below, I can think of Chris Hughton & poor Terry Connor managing in the top echelon in the last year. For some reason, they're not coming through post retirement in anything like the numbers you would expect given the representation at playing level. Question is, what is the reason?
Does it have to involve their colour?
I dont have any evidence to back this up, so please excuse me if I am talking rubbish, but if you look back 20 years or so, when Houghton and Connor were playing I believe there were less black players proportionally than now ?


TwigtheWonderkid

43,405 posts

151 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
Positive discrimination they call it.

When you've had years of discrimiation in a certain profession, positive discrimination is a tool for trying to even things up in a hurry and convince those who were previously barred that the door is now open to them.

Hence women only shortlists for MP positions and other such examples.

In many cases, it can be a good thing. Only by positive discrimination can you encourage black people in any numbers to join the police.

Unfortunately, as a white heterosexual male, it can only work against me.

ascayman

12,759 posts

217 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
TheHeretic said:
Does it have to involve their colour?
I'm sure John Barnes and Paul ince were sacked because of thier colour...

There arent many english managers coming through full stop, black, white or purple with orange spots.

TheHeretic

Original Poster:

73,668 posts

256 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
We have all heard about it. However, how does artificial quotas make anything better?

"Are you here because of your talent, or because of your colour?"

Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

150 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
TheHeretic said:
Does it have to involve their colour?
No and I've said already I agree with the merit argument, but if you said black players represent 40 - 50% of players in the prem & black managers represent this season anyway, 5% I.e Chris Hughton, then it would be reasonable to suggest those black players are being discounted in some way at management level.

Either that or it's a big old coincidence.

TheHeretic

Original Poster:

73,668 posts

256 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
Justin Cyder said:
No and I've said already I agree with the merit argument, but if you said black players represent 40 - 50% of players in the prem & black managers represent this season anyway, 5% I.e Chris Hughton, then it would be reasonable to suggest those black players are being discounted in some way at management level.

Either that or it's a big old coincidence.
Players playing now don't matter. Playing when they would be at retirement age would count, surely, as the other poster said?


Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

150 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
Maybe. It's possibly convoluted to try & work out the trajectory of black players over the past twenty years, but I don't recall many all white teams since I've been following the game from the late seventies.

I'm not looking for monsters in the shadows, just throwing out the notion that ex players have articulated publicly over the years that there can be more to racial discrimination in football than a fknut making like a monkey at Stamford Bridge.

Negative Creep

24,989 posts

228 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
Justin Cyder said:
TheHeretic said:
Does it have to involve their colour?
No and I've said already I agree with the merit argument, but if you said black players represent 40 - 50% of players in the prem & black managers represent this season anyway, 5% I.e Chris Hughton, then it would be reasonable to suggest those black players are being discounted in some way at management level.

Either that or it's a big old coincidence.
A quick look on Wiki says there are approximately 1.5 million black people in the UK at the moment. So going by that isn't 5% more than representative of this country's ethnic balance?

Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

150 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
Again, maybe, but maybe not representative of the ethnic make up of professional football. As I say, I don't have a position one way or the other, just stimulating the debate.