The Official West Ham United Thread. Vol 2

[TCEvo]

RichB said:

TCEvo said:

COYI...

Nervous! COYI...

I'm expecting little & am going to paint a fence post.

Standard WH - no football for three months, star striker gets injured in training

[AJB88]

We look terrible.

[Hammer67]

AJB88 said:

We look terrible.

Bit better last 10 mins.

Fournils missed a sitter.

Need to keep possession better and support Antonio up front.

Why is Declan at centre back?

[2172cc]

Was Gold wearing a pair of cut down WH underpants on his face?

[RichB]

Looking better but Anderson is having a bit of a mare. Keeps giving the ball away...

[Hammer67]

RichB said:

Looking better but Anderson is having a bit of a mare. Keeps giving the ball away...

He needs a serious kick in the sponge.

[RichB]

Hammer67 said:

RichB said:

Looking better but Anderson is having a bit of a mare. Keeps giving the ball away...

He needs a serious kick in the sponge.

Sensible swap with Lanzini

[RichB]

Ah well, with every other team down the bottom picking up points it looks like we're going down. We had to win our home games because otherwise it's teh drop.

[TCEvo]

Moyes out.

[bad company]

We’re 2nd best in all areas, Wolves deserve their win,

[bad company]

Everyone’s been very quiet since the Wolves debacle. On the plus side Lawro predicted us to win against Wolves and lose to Tottenham so there must be hope.

COYI.

Edited by bad company on Tuesday 23 June 18:23

[TCEvo]

Nothing but yet another clueless clusterfk & potentially heavy spanking on the cards tonight (for the team, not me).

COYI!!!

[RichB]

I predict another 5:0 like Citeh vs Burnley last night.

[TCEvo]

Last time we'll play spuds for a longtime.

Shambles.

Moyes out.

[anonymous-user]

Think we're done for.

[2172cc]

Our only hope is that there are three teams worse than us. Mmmm I'm not sure there is.

[bad company]

At least we looked a bit interested this time. Better than the performance against Wolves but still not good enough.

[RichB]

So in the aftermath they're saying it was handball leading up to Soucek's own goal. It was totally unintentional, it was minimal and we were still st but... Antonio's (or was one Rice) had two ruled out earlier in the season for accidental touches of the ball. Rules, however bad, needs to be evenly applied and then changed next season.

[bad company]

RichB said:

So in the aftermath they're saying it was handball leading up to Soucek's own goal. It was totally unintentional, it was minimal and we were still st but... Antonio's (or was one Rice) had two ruled out earlier in the season for accidental touches of the ball. Rules, however bad, needs to be evenly applied and then changed next season.

Very true but in all honesty we were second best. A fair result.

[RichB]

bad company said:

RichB said:

So in the aftermath they're saying it was handball leading up to Soucek's own goal. It was totally unintentional, it was minimal and we were still st but... Antonio's (or was one Rice) had two ruled out earlier in the season for accidental touches of the ball. Rules, however bad, needs to be evenly applied and then changed next season.

Very true but in all honesty we were second best. A fair result.

Which is why I said we were still poor however they've just shown the RIce handball and I remember the Antonio one as well.