The Official Chelsea Thread [Vol 3]

The Official Chelsea Thread [Vol 3]

Author
Discussion

smn159

12,712 posts

218 months

Wednesday 4th May 2022
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
blue al said:
Ratcliffe's bid has been rejected......

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/61320812
Not surprised given that it was so late and the club are up against a deadline so no time for proper due diligence

TEKNOPUG

18,973 posts

206 months

Wednesday 4th May 2022
quotequote all
jammy-git said:
Why didn't they bid before the deadline?
Because it's a PR stunt.

unident

6,702 posts

52 months

Wednesday 4th May 2022
quotequote all
TEKNOPUG said:
jammy-git said:
Why didn't they bid before the deadline?
Because it's a PR stunt.
Is the correct answer

unident

6,702 posts

52 months

Wednesday 4th May 2022
quotequote all
smn159 said:
aeropilot said:
blue al said:
Ratcliffe's bid has been rejected......

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/61320812
Not surprised given that it was so late and the club are up against a deadline so no time for proper due diligence
Didn’t stop BBC News at 6 spending a few minutes interviewing him though. Exactly as TEKNOPUG says, it was a PR stunt.

Wombat3

12,195 posts

207 months

Thursday 5th May 2022
quotequote all
Cheib said:
trackdemon said:
Ascayman said:
Times are reporting Abromovich wants his loan paid back.. wouldn’t that make any sale pretty much a non starter?
They can report what they like, doesn't make it true. Why would he change a very publicly made statement?
Because he’s a lying ? Do you honestly think he’s made as much money as he has by being an honest upstanding citizen ? He admitted in court to paying £1.2 bil in political bribes so he’s well used to the dark arts of the financial world.

There’s too much information in that article for it not to have some truth…when it was reported last week he’d asked for an extra £500mil it indicated the goalposts were being moved.

For this loan to get repaid would be a massive change….for both the buyers and the government. Abramovich is trying to leverage the fact that if he doesn’t green light the sale Chelsea are out of business. As it stands he either gets nothing or he gets his £1.5 bil loans repaid and in five years time he hopes sanctions get lifted and he can get at the money again. He’s got nothing to lose…it’s never good negotiating with someone in that position.
Loan HAS to stay on Chelseas books IMO, makes a complete mockery of the last 10-15 years worth of results if it doesn't.

That and Saudi United and Abu Dhabi City will just use it as a massive loophole to jump through.

Wadeski

8,163 posts

214 months

Thursday 5th May 2022
quotequote all
Wombat3 said:
Cheib said:
trackdemon said:
Ascayman said:
Times are reporting Abromovich wants his loan paid back.. wouldn’t that make any sale pretty much a non starter?
They can report what they like, doesn't make it true. Why would he change a very publicly made statement?
Because he’s a lying ? Do you honestly think he’s made as much money as he has by being an honest upstanding citizen ? He admitted in court to paying £1.2 bil in political bribes so he’s well used to the dark arts of the financial world.

There’s too much information in that article for it not to have some truth…when it was reported last week he’d asked for an extra £500mil it indicated the goalposts were being moved.

For this loan to get repaid would be a massive change….for both the buyers and the government. Abramovich is trying to leverage the fact that if he doesn’t green light the sale Chelsea are out of business. As it stands he either gets nothing or he gets his £1.5 bil loans repaid and in five years time he hopes sanctions get lifted and he can get at the money again. He’s got nothing to lose…it’s never good negotiating with someone in that position.
Loan HAS to stay on Chelseas books IMO, makes a complete mockery of the last 10-15 years worth of results if it doesn't.

That and Saudi United and Abu Dhabi City will just use it as a massive loophole to jump through.
If it does end up with the (appearance) of a Conservative government having effectively wrapped up a private business, because they disagree politically with a foreign owner, that would be a very strange turn of a events for the UK. We tend to get very, very upset when countries like Venezuela, Turkey, Egypt etc etc etc interfere with or nationalize UK-owned businesses for political reasons.

For the party of free market economics to do this would be bizarre through-the-looking-glass stuff. Especially when most of Europe is still shoveling billions of Euros directly into Kremlin coffers through the sale of oil and gas.

smn159

12,712 posts

218 months

Thursday 5th May 2022
quotequote all
Wadeski said:
Wombat3 said:
Cheib said:
trackdemon said:
Ascayman said:
Times are reporting Abromovich wants his loan paid back.. wouldn’t that make any sale pretty much a non starter?
They can report what they like, doesn't make it true. Why would he change a very publicly made statement?
Because he’s a lying ? Do you honestly think he’s made as much money as he has by being an honest upstanding citizen ? He admitted in court to paying £1.2 bil in political bribes so he’s well used to the dark arts of the financial world.

There’s too much information in that article for it not to have some truth…when it was reported last week he’d asked for an extra £500mil it indicated the goalposts were being moved.

For this loan to get repaid would be a massive change….for both the buyers and the government. Abramovich is trying to leverage the fact that if he doesn’t green light the sale Chelsea are out of business. As it stands he either gets nothing or he gets his £1.5 bil loans repaid and in five years time he hopes sanctions get lifted and he can get at the money again. He’s got nothing to lose…it’s never good negotiating with someone in that position.
Loan HAS to stay on Chelseas books IMO, makes a complete mockery of the last 10-15 years worth of results if it doesn't.

That and Saudi United and Abu Dhabi City will just use it as a massive loophole to jump through.
If it does end up with the (appearance) of a Conservative government having effectively wrapped up a private business, because they disagree politically with a foreign owner, that would be a very strange turn of a events for the UK. We tend to get very, very upset when countries like Venezuela, Turkey, Egypt etc etc etc interfere with or nationalize UK-owned businesses for political reasons.

For the party of free market economics to do this would be bizarre through-the-looking-glass stuff. Especially when most of Europe is still shoveling billions of Euros directly into Kremlin coffers through the sale of oil and gas.
Especially when said Conservative government has been cozying up to those close to Putin for years.

Any news on Lebedev having to give his peerage back?

GT03ROB

13,268 posts

222 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
Le roi est mort, vive le roi

So the roman empire is now at an end. There are many who will find fault with how he came by his money & his involvement with Putin. However how many owners can claim to have been angels? However this is not the point. For close on 20 years Chelsea have had an owner who has supported the club fully, not stripped it, spent money & supported things that many others owners have not. One thinks of the academy investing in future stars, yes it's taken time but look at where some of the best young talent in English football has come from. Declan Rice anyone? His arranging of regular visits to Holocaust sites in Poland for the youth to make them aware of the tradegies of discrimination. Despite what many think the club has got many things very right off the field. Yes there have been mistakes like the short lived dalliance with Euro Super League. The on field record speaks for itself. It could have been better....so much better... mistakes were made..... but it wouldn;t be Chelsea otherwise. It's been a great ride, thank you Roman.

As for the new king... it seems he has a good record with sports ownership and has driven the revival of the LA Dodgers. It won't be the same but lets hope the differences balance each other. Less vanity purchases (Shevchenko, Torres).... more managerial tolerance (why oh why was Ancelloti sacked?)

Hopefully a bit of certainty will shore up the onfield performances get us over the line for the Champions League next year & give us a good showing in the Cup Final. A few key signings over the summer and he squad & manager will still not be fundamentally different from that which won the CL

KTBFFH


blue al

957 posts

160 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
More twists to come I bet,
This political football still needs a good kicking …

I’m still looking for some Clarity on the Charity …
Hopefully the war is over before the sale completes.

aeropilot

34,671 posts

228 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
blue al said:
Hopefully the war is over before the sale completes.
The sale has to be completed by 31st May when the Govt licence runs out....

Sadly, the war in Ukraine will be going on for a lot longer than that unless one of Pootin's inner circle puts a bullet through Mad Vlad's head in the meantime....

trackdemon

12,193 posts

262 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
I fking hate football rolleyes

968

11,965 posts

249 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
FFS

We are Spurs.

A Winner Is You

24,990 posts

228 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
Bottled yet again. Although that disallowed goal was a complete joke, Salah scores that and it's given 100% of the time.

Adam.

27,264 posts

255 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
A Winner Is You said:
Bottled yet again. Although that disallowed goal was a complete joke, Salah scores that and it's given 100% of the time.
Pathetic level of whinging that

trackdemon

12,193 posts

262 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
Dear Mr Gunner,

Please accept our gracious gift of 3rd place, we don't want it.

yours sincerely,
CFC

originals

1,635 posts

28 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
GT03ROB said:
For close on 20 years Chelsea have had an owner who has supported the club fully, not stripped it
He did a good job of stripping his homeland though

TwigtheWonderkid

43,406 posts

151 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
originals said:
GT03ROB said:
For close on 20 years Chelsea have had an owner who has supported the club fully, not stripped it
He did a good job of stripping his homeland though
He has? Wiki states he has given more money away than any other living Russian, most of that to his homeland. Ask the people of Cukotka, they got more from RA than they ever would have got from the Russian govt.

But back to the football, we're on the crest of a slump.

unident

6,702 posts

52 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
He has? Wiki states he has given more money away than any other living Russian, most of that to his homeland. Ask the people of Cukotka, they got more from RA than they ever would have got from the Russian govt.

But back to the football, we're on the crest of a slump.
Luckily he won all his money gambling in Monaco too, or was it a few EuroMillions jackpots while on a lucky streak. In no way did he get that from asset stripping the country in any way whatsoever rolleyes

TwigtheWonderkid

43,406 posts

151 months

Sunday 8th May 2022
quotequote all
unident said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
He has? Wiki states he has given more money away than any other living Russian, most of that to his homeland. Ask the people of Cukotka, they got more from RA than they ever would have got from the Russian govt.

But back to the football, we're on the crest of a slump.
Luckily he won all his money gambling in Monaco too, or was it a few EuroMillions jackpots while on a lucky streak. In no way did he get that from asset stripping the country in any way whatsoever rolleyes
Lots of people got very rich in post communist Russia. Very few of them gave anything back.

TEKNOPUG

18,973 posts

206 months

Sunday 8th May 2022
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
unident said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
He has? Wiki states he has given more money away than any other living Russian, most of that to his homeland. Ask the people of Cukotka, they got more from RA than they ever would have got from the Russian govt.

But back to the football, we're on the crest of a slump.
Luckily he won all his money gambling in Monaco too, or was it a few EuroMillions jackpots while on a lucky streak. In no way did he get that from asset stripping the country in any way whatsoever rolleyes
Lots of people got very rich in post communist Russia. Very few of them gave anything back.
RA said:
Here, have some of your money back I stole from you
I believe he was also very supportive of the Super Yacht industry....

What a guy!