The Official Liverpool FC Thread [Vol 13]

The Official Liverpool FC Thread [Vol 13]

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

jammy-git

29,778 posts

213 months

Thursday 18th January 2018
quotequote all
franki68 said:
Made up figures for a start.
No deal been done yet.
Only united transfers are constantly broken down into total costs,or did vvd just cost you 70-75m ? You pay no agent fees,no salary?
As a percent of turnover united are amongst the lowest wage payers so it’s easily affordable .

I think we can all agree it’s insanity but these are market conditions .
How do you know they're made up figures?

VVD will cost us in total around £130m, despite the transfer fee being more than double the transfer of Sanchez and VVD being one of the best paid defenders in the Premier League.

Personally I have no issues with the transfer. There still doesn't seem to be any coherent strategy to Utd's player signings. Attack was not an area where they needed a player earning £400k and he's in the fading light of his career. I imagine he'll help Utd get top four this season, but how good he's going to be after this season is anyone's guess. Plus it seems he likes a good tantrum, so rather see him in Utd's dressing room than anyone elses.

Gameface

16,565 posts

78 months

Thursday 18th January 2018
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Over the course of their managerial careers?

Not in the articles I've seen.



jammy-git

29,778 posts

213 months

Thursday 18th January 2018
quotequote all
franki68 said:
Gameface said:
Their is a mercenary element to the game sure, but being happy to sign for City on Monday and signing for Utd on Thursday, is taking the piss in my book.

He genuinely couldn't give a fk about Utd, yet he'll be their hero once he signs on the dotted line.

Just doesn't sit right with me.

No doubt he'll come out that it was dream to play for them when he a youngster playing in the streets of Chile...
Anyway about your last point

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.sportbible.com/fo...

From 2011
http://news.ladbrokes.com/football/premier-league/...

So who really knows.
If that's the case then it's really a shot in the foot for Woodward for spending SO much more money on him than anyone else was willing to.

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 18th January 2018
quotequote all
jammy-git said:
How do you know they're made up figures?

VVD will cost us in total around £130m, despite the transfer fee being more than double the transfer of Sanchez and VVD being one of the best paid defenders in the Premier League.

Personally I have no issues with the transfer. There still doesn't seem to be any coherent strategy to Utd's player signings. Attack was not an area where they needed a player earning £400k and he's in the fading light of his career. I imagine he'll help Utd get top four this season, but how good he's going to be after this season is anyone's guess. Plus it seems he likes a good tantrum, so rather see him in Utd's dressing room than anyone elses.
He hasn't even signed yet, but the papers are privy to the finer details of his contract, ok

So an average defender is costing 130m but if we pay 180m for one of the best attackers in the league we are fools

Have you seen our right wing? Its largely empty, we need someone in attack, Sanchez is a perfect Mourinho winger, great in attack and tracks back, fading light? He's 29 (in fact he only turned 29 3 weeks ago) he's in his prime. Show me evidence of a tantrum? Or is it a case you believe everything you read in the papers?


m3sye

26,231 posts

202 months

Thursday 18th January 2018
quotequote all
If he can get back to the form of a year ago it's a good signing
How long they will get out of him is in question as he relies on speed and you don't find many top forwards like that at the top of their game 30+

Money is Irrelevant ... Utd can afford it

curlie467

7,650 posts

202 months

Thursday 18th January 2018
quotequote all
The money is irrelevant as it's all relative and that's just the way the game is heading.
I think it's a good signing if/when it goes through, I'd like him in our team ("to replace who blah blah, back off vultures") as there's no harm in competition for places.
I did however think that Mkyt was a good signing too.

Anyway, everyone is a mercenary, all of us would jump companies to another that promises more in every way conceivable.

jammy-git

29,778 posts

213 months

Thursday 18th January 2018
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I thought everything had been agreed with Sanchez and the hold up now is Mhiki?

Though, City thought they'd agreed everything with Sanchez too before it seems he went back on his word. So I guess you're right to want to wait until it's been made official!

franki68

10,422 posts

222 months

Thursday 18th January 2018
quotequote all
jammy-git said:
franki68 said:
Made up figures for a start.
No deal been done yet.
Only united transfers are constantly broken down into total costs,or did vvd just cost you 70-75m ? You pay no agent fees,no salary?
As a percent of turnover united are amongst the lowest wage payers so it’s easily affordable .

I think we can all agree it’s insanity but these are market conditions .
How do you know they're made up figures?

VVD will cost us in total around £130m, despite the transfer fee being more than double the transfer of Sanchez and VVD being one of the best paid defenders in the Premier League.

Personally I have no issues with the transfer. There still doesn't seem to be any coherent strategy to Utd's player signings. Attack was not an area where they needed a player earning £400k and he's in the fading light of his career. I imagine he'll help Utd get top four this season, but how good he's going to be after this season is anyone's guess. Plus it seems he likes a good tantrum, so rather see him in Utd's dressing room than anyone elses.
Jammy come on,how do I know it’s made up?
How is it not made up?no deal has been done.what happens if united swap mhiki? There goes your 30m transfer fee,signing on fee ‘estimated ‘
And that’s without factoring in if mhiki is swapped then his salary is offset against part of Sanchez’s.
How do you know united have not negotiated his supposed salary demands ?
But hey it must be true it’s in a newspaper !




Adam B

27,287 posts

255 months

Thursday 18th January 2018
quotequote all
type-r said:
The deal is worth a staggering £180 million! ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY MILLION POUNDS.

Salary: £121.5m Total Contract (27m a year before tax, over four-and-a-half year. 400k a week)
are football years different?

£27m / 52 weeks = £519k/week

genuine question - I;ve always assumed they get paid their obscene wages for all 52 weeks

franki68

10,422 posts

222 months

Thursday 18th January 2018
quotequote all
Adam B said:
type-r said:
The deal is worth a staggering £180 million! ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY MILLION POUNDS.

Salary: £121.5m Total Contract (27m a year before tax, over four-and-a-half year. 400k a week)
are football years different?

£27m / 52 weeks = £519k/week

genuine question - I;ve always assumed they get paid their obscene wages for all 52 weeks
Diane Abbott wrote the article.

Adam B

27,287 posts

255 months

Thursday 18th January 2018
quotequote all
Gameface said:
Their is a mercenary element to the game sure, but being happy to sign for City on Monday and signing for Utd on Thursday, is taking the piss in my book.

He genuinely couldn't give a fk about Utd, yet he'll be their hero once he signs on the dotted line.

Just doesn't sit right with me.

No doubt he'll come out that it was dream to play for them when he a youngster playing in the streets of Chile...
Whilst none of us like the way the game is heading, you are in for years of shock and disappointment!

Why would a player from Chile give a st about a club in Manchester before signing (he may gain an appreciation whilst there, he may not).

He will want to sign for a club of stature, with deep pockets to invest, decent manager and will pay him his massive wage demands. Just like any of us (minus a few zeros) he will chose a job balancing out those few factors. He wanted to work for Pep but maybe they offered 100k per week less, so he doesn't want to work for Pep as much anymore!

History doesn't count for much these days. He joined a big club with history Arsenal, and look at their trajectory now.

I hoped he would go abroad or to City, as he would strengthen any team other than City a lot

type-r

14,106 posts

214 months

Thursday 18th January 2018
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Is Mkhitaryan worthless?

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 18th January 2018
quotequote all
type-r said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Is Mkhitaryan worthless?
No but the net is 0

If we sold Mhiki for 30m and paid 30m for Sanchez would that calculation have a fee in it?

The same way they dont account for us getting 150k a week off the wage bill for Mhiki

Its just a load of guesses and supposition with a smattering on BS

Gameface

16,565 posts

78 months

Thursday 18th January 2018
quotequote all
I apologize for bringing this topic up this morning, as all we are doing is discussing an Arsenal/Manc player in the Liverpool thread now.


joshcowin

6,813 posts

177 months

Thursday 18th January 2018
quotequote all
How many times, money is irrelevant in football now, as fans I cannot see why you/I would care about player costs and wages?!

Performance, track record, attitude all things worth looking at, money couldn't care less its not going to affect any of us in here discussing it, its a pointless discussion!

jammy-git

29,778 posts

213 months

Thursday 18th January 2018
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
How do you know Mhiki is on £150k a week?

m3sye

26,231 posts

202 months

Thursday 18th January 2018
quotequote all
joshcowin said:
How many times, money is irrelevant in football now, as fans I cannot see why you/I would care about player costs and wages?!

Performance, track record, attitude all things worth looking at, money couldn't care less its not going to affect any of us in here discussing it, its a pointless discussion!
Correct

I dont understand why people even mention it, they think its bad now will only get worse - Amazon and Facebook probably going to come into the equation soon which mean more £££

which means bigger fee's and more on wages

Unless every fan in the country makes a stand against ticket prices we will never see any of it... that will never happen so just brush it off anytime you hear anything about a fee or wage

franki68

10,422 posts

222 months

Thursday 18th January 2018
quotequote all
You lot are flying at the moment,just forked out for a player you need and you are worried about united spending a few quid ?
Your concern is touching.

joshcowin

6,813 posts

177 months

Thursday 18th January 2018
quotequote all
franki68 said:
You lot are flying at the moment,just forked out for a player you need and you are worried about united spending a few quid ?
Your concern is touching.
I am not, I am also not concerned with UTD in any way wink

Flip Martian

19,718 posts

191 months

Thursday 18th January 2018
quotequote all
FFS some of you would eat a cake and then argue about how many crumbs are left! laugh
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED