The Official Liverpool FC Thread [Vol 15]

[NRS]

type-r said:

Righto. So Fab, TAA and Gomez injured, Milner suspended, Clyne loaned - who is playing RB vs Leicester?

Firmino?

No need to worry, Klopp knows what he is doing.

[m3sye]

type-r said:

Righto. So Fab, TAA and Gomez injured, Milner suspended, Clyne loaned - who is playing RB vs Leicester?

Firmino?

I imagine it will be Camacho if we have no one else

[anonymous-user]

m3sye said:

I imagine it will be Camacho if we have no one else

He got one more tackle in on Zaha than Milner did on Saturday!

[wjb]

desolate said:

m3sye said:

I imagine it will be Camacho if we have no one else

He got one more tackle in on Zaha than Milner did on Saturday!

He's half milners age tbf

[type-r]

wjb said:

desolate said:

m3sye said:

I imagine it will be Camacho if we have no one else

He got one more tackle in on Zaha than Milner did on Saturday!

He's half milners age tbf

He is a RB tbf!

[Old Man Fred]

Slightly OT but the reply before the original post, Pommy, are you a time traveller..

ETA - i assume the post was was edited so the time stamp is the edited time?

[NRS]

No, if editted the post stays in the same place - if done quickly enough it has nothing to show the edit. If done a little slower then it shows an edit footnote.

[Adam B]

NRS said:

No, if editted the post stays in the same place - if done quickly enough it has nothing to show the edit. If done a little slower then it shows an edit footnote.

I have often wondered about that - so if you edit before any further replies it doesn't add the footnote that shows up you made some daft spelling or grammar error ?

[NRS]

Adam B said:

NRS said:

No, if editted the post stays in the same place - if done quickly enough it has nothing to show the edit. If done a little slower then it shows an edit footnote.

I have often wondered about that - so if you edit before any further replies it doesn't add the footnote that shows up you made some daft spelling or grammar error ?

Even if there is no replies it will add an edit footnote after a certain amount of time - think it is 5 minutes or less.

[type-r]

I deleted the previous post and reposted an edited version! Pommy just happened to respond to it before I could delete it. I then posted a new version with my edit! Either that or he does travel through time!

[Adam B]

NRS said:

Even if there is no replies it will add an edit footnote after a certain amount of time - think it is 5 minutes or less.

ah right, thanks

[Old Man Fred]

type-r said:

I deleted the previous post and reposted an edited version! Pommy just happened to respond to it before I could delete it. I then posted a new version with my edit! Either that or he does travel through time!

ah that explains it!

I edited mine a couple of time just after posting but it didn't show up as an edit so 5 mins sounds about right

[NRS]

The one I have never worked out is the occasional new post with no title - no idea how that is possible!

[type-r]

I imagine that is due to a simple whitespace character being used in the subject line. Never tried it myself but in theory would make sense.

[jammy-git]

I believe most of the time it's caused by mobile devices. Someone submits a reply then puts away their phone. A few hours later they come back to their phone, open the browser and most modern mobiles will automatically refresh the page, which often resubmits the form. I guess sometimes/some devices refresh the form without any data.

[type-r]

Interesting analysis by ex-ref Dermot Gallagher on SkySports. He says that if Salah won the penalty on Saturday, the incident would have been retrospectively reviewed by the 3 man panel and had they judged he had dived, he would have been given an automatic 2 match ban.

But bcause no penalty was given, it cannot be reviewed. Lucky? Food for thought for the WUM's to chew on.

[Adam B]

type-r said:

Interesting analysis by ex-ref Dermot Gallagher on SkySports. He says that if Salah won the penalty on Saturday, the incident would have been retrospectively reviewed by the 3 man panel and had they judged he had dived, he would have been given an automatic 2 match ban.

But bcause no penalty was given, it cannot be reviewed. Lucky? Food for thought for the WUM's to chew on.

stupid rule, any alleged dive should be investigated, and retro action should be taken

[epom]

Hopefully Salah will do a bit of pool work this week now whilst on hols

[Guvernator]

Adam B said:

stupid rule, any alleged dive should be investigated, and retro action should be taken

Agree, it's a disgraceful part of modern football that's been allowed to go on for far too long. What other major sport turns a blind eye to blatant cheating?

[NRS]

Hm, strange! Could lead to players trying to argue to the ref they dived, to avoid a penalty and later ban - particularly if it's in a game you're easily winning!