The Official Manchester United Thread (Vol 9)
Discussion
Adam B said:
Pogba’s agent seems to agree with you lot, the utter scumbag maggot that he is:
Manchester United would ruin Pelé and Maradona too, claims Paul Pogba’s agent Mino Raiola
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/manchester-unit...
Here we go again then...Manchester United would ruin Pelé and Maradona too, claims Paul Pogba’s agent Mino Raiola
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/manchester-unit...
Way too much influence for my liking (not just him)
Anti-Utd bias in the media is going wild after last night. We owed the win to VAR apparently, despite both goals being correctly ruled out and the red card decision being at least arguably correct. My own view is that it was clearly not a red card offence, but the important point is that it’s obviously something on which people can disagree.
I watched a fairly comfortable win against a very poor Chelsea side. Apparently I’m wrong and it was all that terrible VAR again, making those dastardly correct decisions.
I watched a fairly comfortable win against a very poor Chelsea side. Apparently I’m wrong and it was all that terrible VAR again, making those dastardly correct decisions.
ORD said:
Anti-Utd bias in the media is going wild after last night. We owed the win to VAR apparently, despite both goals being correctly ruled out and the red card decision being at least arguably correct.
I think the bias is yours. It was definitely a red card, and the first goal was incorrectly ruled out. The 2nd goal was correctly ruled out. Man Utd were the better side and deserved to win, but VAR was useless.....again. TwigtheWonderkid said:
I think the bias is yours. It was definitely a red card, and the first goal was incorrectly ruled out. The 2nd goal was correctly ruled out. Man Utd were the better side and deserved to win, but VAR was useless.....again.
Incorrectly ruled out for an obvious push? I dont think thats even within the bounds of reasonable views. Generally good performance last night. We're still missing a strong goal scorer but we knew that already. Shaw looked better than I've seen him in years, Bailly played well and we had some good play overall. Our new signings played well too (although the second was only on a few mins but nearly scored).
I think the game could have been 2-2 and Chelsea basically had the same issue as us, with no decent strikers (until the French bloke came on).
We just need consistent performances...
I think the game could have been 2-2 and Chelsea basically had the same issue as us, with no decent strikers (until the French bloke came on).
We just need consistent performances...
SaggyOstrich said:
SaggyOstrich said:
Chelsea A - Lose
Watford H - Win
Everton A - Draw
City H - Lose
Tottenham A - Lose
Sheff U H - Draw
I'm off to a flyer here Watford H - Win
Everton A - Draw
City H - Lose
Tottenham A - Lose
Sheff U H - Draw
Consistency now please Ole. Which will come with a little run!
Great to see Bailly back as well. He still looks like he’s got a mistake in him and his tackling can make one wince but he’s a better option than calamity.
A positive couple of days, roll on Thursday.
Gassing Station | Football | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff