The Official Newcastle United Thread

The Official Newcastle United Thread

Author
Discussion

fathomfive

9,936 posts

191 months

Tuesday 23rd July 2019
quotequote all
ellroy said:
Reported £40m!

What game is the fat chump playing?
Control.

andrewparker

8,014 posts

188 months

Tuesday 23rd July 2019
quotequote all
Got to say, I'm amazed Ashely has sanctioned a £40m transfer.

Chicken Chaser

7,842 posts

225 months

Tuesday 23rd July 2019
quotequote all
fathomfive said:
Control.
It highlights that Ashley saw Rafa as a threat, and he was in a power struggle. This is fingers up to Rafa over the spending policy from him.

fathomfive

9,936 posts

191 months

Tuesday 23rd July 2019
quotequote all
Chicken Chaser said:
fathomfive said:
Control.
It highlights that Ashley saw Rafa as a threat, and he was in a power struggle. This is fingers up to Rafa over the spending policy from him.
Indeed.

clarkmagpie

3,562 posts

196 months

Tuesday 23rd July 2019
quotequote all
Looks like possibly a second Brazilian striker incoming!
£30m
Cor blimey

Don't mind the fat slug playing these sorts of games!

DoctorX

7,314 posts

168 months

Friday 26th July 2019
quotequote all
That’s a nasty little tax bill the Belgians have hit FCB with. Hopefully he’ll have to sell an asset to pay it....

ray von

2,916 posts

253 months

Saturday 27th July 2019
quotequote all
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article...

Interesting reading that. So Ashley was willing to put in £23m of his own money to sign Joelinton scratchchin

TameRacingDriver

18,111 posts

273 months

Saturday 27th July 2019
quotequote all
Literally just came here to post this.

Interesting read.

I will actually now say that although I still very far from like Mike Ashley, I do think there’s more to this whole MA/RB situation than met the eye.

I do believe he had this Chinese deal lined up for months and had no intention of staying. It seems highly unlikely to me that he can leave the club one day and then just get this contract the following day. It implies a large degree of planning.

It’s also interesting that many of the players have actually warmed to Steve Bruce and some even saying Rafa going was possibly for the best. Certainly my dad has never believed Rafa to be the messiah most people thought and am starting to wonder.

All that being said, I still don’t think there’s much cause to be happy with things at the moment, but time will tell.

ray von

2,916 posts

253 months

Saturday 27th July 2019
quotequote all
Glad to see you're starting to take the blinkers off, a bit, I've been telling you lot for ages Benitez has played you like a fiddle

TameRacingDriver

18,111 posts

273 months

Saturday 27th July 2019
quotequote all
I dare say not everyone will be so agreeable, mind smile

andrewparker

8,014 posts

188 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
My thoughts echo those of Kevin Rawlinson – https://twitter.com/KevinJRawlinson/status/1154891...


SydneyBridge

8,663 posts

159 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
if there was a 'who is telling the truth' competition, Rafa would win every time
he says that he offered Rafa an 8 year contract- so what...

Comparing Newcastle to spurs, Newcastle are a much bigger club in terms of support etc, so should be getting more in sponsorship

Adam B

27,309 posts

255 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
Wow some short memories and revisionism here imho

I’m Liverpool so neutral but to believe that PR article in the Wail from a slippery scumbag like MA over what’s been staring you in the face for years is odd.

Of course Rafa was planning an alternative if MA continued his nonsense.

Then he goes out and buys a couple of players to make a point that “it wasn't me honest guv”

Edited by Adam B on Monday 29th July 16:25

SwipeRight

138 posts

59 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
SydneyBridge said:
Comparing Newcastle to spurs, Newcastle are a much bigger club in terms of support etc, so should be getting more in sponsorship
That's a joke right? In terms of support and etc - whatever "etc" is.

A simple google will put you straight on both points.

JNW1

7,811 posts

195 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
SwipeRight said:
SydneyBridge said:
Comparing Newcastle to spurs, Newcastle are a much bigger club in terms of support etc, so should be getting more in sponsorship
That's a joke right? In terms of support and etc - whatever "etc" is.

A simple google will put you straight on both points.
I'm not a Newcastle fan but I'd say they're one of the best supported teams in the country; they were still filling St James' Park for home games even when they were in the Championship and I'm not convinced Spurs would have managed that at the old White Hart Lane never mind the new one. I'd also say the size of Newcastle's away following is more than a match for most clubs and, when you bear in mind they haven't won a major trophy in decades, the level and loyalty of their support really is quite impressive IMO....

SwipeRight

138 posts

59 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
JNW1 said:
SwipeRight said:
SydneyBridge said:
Comparing Newcastle to spurs, Newcastle are a much bigger club in terms of support etc, so should be getting more in sponsorship
That's a joke right? In terms of support and etc - whatever "etc" is.

A simple google will put you straight on both points.
I'm not a Newcastle fan but I'd say they're one of the best supported teams in the country; they were still filling St James' Park for home games even when they were in the Championship and I'm not convinced Spurs would have managed that at the old White Hart Lane never mind the new one. I'd also say the size of Newcastle's away following is more than a match for most clubs and, when you bear in mind they haven't won a major trophy in decades, the level and loyalty of their support really is quite impressive IMO....
When Spurs last went down for one year they set away attendance records all over the country for a 2nd division team. They also filled old White Hart Lane most weeks.

Spurs currently hold other records for attendance (European home attendance) and their worldwide shirt sales easily outstrip Newcastles. We also have a huge waiting list for season tickets and easily sell out every week at our new ground.

There is no metric I can think of that would make Newcastle bigger than Spurs at this time.

Any Financial, Attendance or Achievement metric you care to name.

Yes, Newcastle are a big club, no doubt, but you're only really big in Newcastle.

Any way, this is a nonsense argument designed to inflame I suspect - and so I've taken the bait - which was a mistake. I'll not reply again.

Cheers

SydneyBridge

8,663 posts

159 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
I am not a Newcastle fan- was just commenting on the article that was linked to on Twitter

Apologies - on googling worldwide football teams- Spurs are the 13th best supported team

quoted from the article, about what MA has said

'He says clubs such as Spurs can attract significantly larger sponsorship deals than #NUFC, giving them a financial head-start, which is plainly true

What he's not saying is that the value of the shirt sponsorship's directly linked to the club’s performance and consequent global exposure

Spurs played in a Champions League final in front of 11.3 million people at the end of last season.
haven’t played in the Champions League since before Ashley bought the club.

What's more, the last time they did, their shirt deal was reportedly worth more than Spurs’

In other words, the divergence in the values of the two clubs' shirt sponsorship deals is as much a measure of how much better run Spurs are these days than #NUFC under Ashley'


Edited by SydneyBridge on Monday 29th July 13:46

TX1

2,375 posts

184 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
Adam B said:
Wow some short memories and revisionism here imho

I’m Liverpool so neutral but to believe that PR article in the Wail from a slippery scumbag like MA over what’s been staring you in the face for years is odd.

Of course Rafa was planning an alternative if MA continued his nonsense.

Then he goes out and buys a coupe of players to make a point that it want me honest guv
My exact thoughts, could not have put it better myself.

JNW1

7,811 posts

195 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
SwipeRight said:
When Spurs last went down for one year they set away attendance records all over the country for a 2nd division team. They also filled old White Hart Lane most weeks.
Not true! When Spurs were last in the old 2nd division (1977/78) the capacity at the old White Hart Lane was just over 50,000; however, only once did they get that for a home game during that season and a lot of the time attendances were more like high 20k's or low 30k's (so nowhere near filling the stadium as you suggest). In contrast, when Newcastle were in the Championship recently they were still getting 50k for almost every home game.

I'm not sure about setting away attendance records all over the country but given the claim about home attendances is obvious nonsense I rather suspect the same applies to the claim about Tottenham's away following as well....

SwipeRight said:
Spurs currently hold other records for attendance (European home attendance)
Really? Celtic played Leeds at Hampden Park in the semi-final of the European Cup in 1970 and the attendance was just over 136k - might be wrong but I don't think Tottenham have hosted a European game where the attendance has been anything like that?

SwipeRight said:
worldwide shirt sales easily outstrip Newcastles. We also have a huge waiting list for season tickets and easily sell out every week at our new ground.

There is no metric I can think of that would make Newcastle bigger than Spurs at this time.

Any Financial, Attendance or Achievement metric you care to name.
I think your reference to "at this time" probably speaks volumes as you come across as someone who's probably relatively young with little or no grasp of the history. Of course Tottenham are currently more successful than Newcastle (and indeed most other English clubs) and hats off to them for what they've achieved; however, just because they're doing well at the moment doesn't make them a bigger club than the likes of Newcastle - better run certainly but not bigger IMHO.

In similar vein I'd argue Manchester City and Chelsea are in some respects no bigger than Newcastle; they just happen to have owners with deep pockets who've been prepared to invest heavily to achieve success. However, historically neither of those clubs has commanded the sort of following through thick and thin that Newcastle has enjoyed - if grass roots support is a measure of how big a club is then in my view Newcastle are one of the biggest clubs in England. And to reiterate, I'm not saying this as a Newcastle fan!

Chicken Chaser

7,842 posts

225 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
Considering we've been owner by this idiot for the last 11 years or so, we are still rank at 19th in the world's Richest club. Spurs are now 10th but at the start of Ashley's reign I am confident that we were clearly better off than Spurs. They have been well managed at board and training ground level in that time where as we have been stripped and cheapened.