PPP vs Scooby World stage 1

PPP vs Scooby World stage 1

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Monday 20th August 2012
quotequote all
What are the differences?
Obviously prodrive are the better/bigger name but I've not heard a bad word about the Scooby World one.

Ved

3,825 posts

176 months

Monday 20th August 2012
quotequote all
One is a remap for every car, one is a remap for your own. Exhausts, filters, fuel pumps will all produce the same sort of thing. The key is to get the right mapper on it so personally I would get the work done and get Jolly Green Monster to sort out the ECU, although Zen used him in the past so you might want to check with them too.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Monday 20th August 2012
quotequote all
Do you know what sort of figures you get from the JGM remap?
And would anti lag be as fatal as I imagine or is it on a switch like the launch control?

Ved

3,825 posts

176 months

Monday 20th August 2012
quotequote all
PSBuckshot said:
Do you know what sort of figures you get from the JGM remap?
And would anti lag be as fatal as I imagine or is it on a switch like the launch control?
You'll get what you want but it'll be over 300 bhp and safely mapped. It also depends on what engine your car has as the 2.0 will get over 300 but the torque figures from a 2.5 will be much higher.

Antilag is for racing, it will hasten the expiry of your engine so I don't see the point. When do you really do 4,500 full launches?

The rule I had with any power modifications, outside of the obvious brake upgrades, is to forget about numbers and concentrate on the drivability of the car. You'll get a nice smooth torque curve with a custom remap and the car will benefit just by this.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 21st August 2012
quotequote all
Ved said:
You'll get what you want but it'll be over 300 bhp and safely mapped. It also depends on what engine your car has as the 2.0 will get over 300 but the torque figures from a 2.5 will be much higher.

Antilag is for racing, it will hasten the expiry of your engine so I don't see the point. When do you really do 4,500 full launches?

The rule I had with any power modifications, outside of the obvious brake upgrades, is to forget about numbers and concentrate on the drivability of the car. You'll get a nice smooth torque curve with a custom remap and the car will benefit just by this.
I just love the sound of anti-lag hehe

Would an exhaust (shall be fitting a Blitz Nur), new air filter, fuel pump and remap really take my WRX to over 300bhp?
Its an 02 Bugeye, over 300bhp seems quite a lot.

Ved

3,825 posts

176 months

Tuesday 21st August 2012
quotequote all
A WRX will take a bit more but a bug STI would be a better place to start. The internals on the bug is also incredibly strong.

You'll see 260+ from your WRX

ScoobieWRX

4,863 posts

227 months

Tuesday 21st August 2012
quotequote all
You'll see up to and around 275-280 bhp normally with supporting mods which is about the safe limit of the turbo and injectors before the turbo starts turning into a flame thrower and your injectors start to run out of fuel.

You can squeeze more out but intake air temps from the turbo start to rise rapidly with the standard WRX TMIC and the injectors can't squirt enough fuel to to try and keep cylinders cool and air fuel ratios where you want them without some assistance from an adjustable fuel pressure regulator running 3.5bar - 4.0bar, and even then you'll probably want to change the fuel pump for safety/reliability/fuel supply sake.

Then you could see 290-300bhp at a push. Add some Methanol and you'll get there no problem but keeping Methanol ratio in your fuel tank at the same level all the time is a ball ache and you need to carry Methanol everywhere you go for when you fill up.

WRX's should be mapped for bottom to mid range torque, that's where the car comes alive, becomes more economical, provides effortless overtaking, quick out of corners etc... The TD04 turbo lends itself very well to that type of tuning. Forget BHP power numbers, doesn't make your car quick or nice to drive.

Torque rules!!

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 21st August 2012
quotequote all
I don't want it to be a mad performance beast anyway, this is why I'm doing up my Mini for!
I'll look into that JGM/simtek remap + exhaust and that.

Session8

145 posts

142 months

Tuesday 21st August 2012
quotequote all
Hi all,

Just out of intrest and for my own education, I had my Evo 8 put to Stage 1 about a year ago and for that changed the fuel pump, Cat delete pipe, air box mod or filter followed by a remap.

Putting friendly rivalry aside and the fact they are different engines, would the priniciple changes not be similar for both?

In reference to the comments about chasing numbers, I couldn't agree more. Driveability is everything, a good Stage 1 changed my Evo completely.

ScoobieWRX

4,863 posts

227 months

Tuesday 21st August 2012
quotequote all
EVO and Impreza are very similar to remap. They both benefit from similar mods by way of exhaust and air filter and depending on how far you are going over standard, fuel pump, turbo and injectors too.

KaraK

13,187 posts

210 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
My bug-eye WRX has PPP and it RR'd at 256.3 bhp - the PPP certainly isn't a big power solution but it gives very respectable figures IMHO while keeping the car very usable day to day.

RB Will

9,666 posts

241 months

Thursday 30th August 2012
quotequote all
just on a side note. Unless you already have it try a different exhaust. I had a Blitz Nur on my old classic and my god was it loud, did not pass noise tests at a few tracks. Was about 99db and without the cat that went up to 115! Put a Milltek on it after that which brought it down enough to about 95.

Now running my P1 I have a full RCM system which is only about 90db even without the cat.

Mr Fix It

466 posts

269 months

Thursday 30th August 2012
quotequote all
Also take a look at the APS exhaust. It's really well made, and fits very well, quite loud, but not stupid..