how much air does an A380 shift?

how much air does an A380 shift?

Author
Discussion

Simpo Two

85,603 posts

266 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
Metal that floats...?


You measure the Weight and Volume of each coin to get the density. Alloy is lower density than gold, so you can tell them apart. But they will still both sink in water.

R300will

3,799 posts

152 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Metal that floats...?
apparently so according to the story. i mean if you shape it right yes but that is displacement. if you are relying on pure density then i doubt any metal will foat, even mercury.

BarnatosGhost

31,608 posts

254 months

Saturday 14th April 2012
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
BarnatosGhost said:
If I remember correctly I think he'd been challenged to work out whether the king's crown had been made of pure gold, or of a gold alloy. Displacement gave him the ability to work it out, since a pure gold crown would displace the same amount as a lump of gold of the same weight as the crown. An alloy crown would be displace a different amount to that same lump of gold.
That's like asking 'Which is heavier, a pound of lead or a pound of feathers?'

Assuming both crowns were heavier than water, if they were the same volume they'd displace the same amount of water. 1cm3 of metal displaces 1cm3 of water; it has no option whatever it is (unless it floats). But combining volume with weight gives density, which is probably what you were thinking of smile
Yes, he found the weight of the crown, and so in a water bath he could calculate the volume of a lump of pure gold of the same weight.

Then the crucial final question is whether the crown displaces the same amount of water as the lump of gold. If it didn't, then it wasn't pure gold.

Blackpuddin

Original Poster:

16,592 posts

206 months

Saturday 14th April 2012
quotequote all
R300will said:
Zad said:
Cross-section area * velocity (in metres/second) * density of air at that altitude.

Air density @ sea level = 1.225 kg.m^3
Relative density @ 10,000M = 0.333
Mach 0.84 = 283m/s
Cross sectional area .. dunno, 150m^2?

That is approximately 17,000kg or 17 tonnes of air directly displaced.

As to indirect displacement, how much air the engines the move, or the drag induced on the system, that's a whole different kettle of fish and can of worms.
Beat me too it but i agree with the maths shown above.
I theng yow

Chuck328

1,581 posts

168 months

Sunday 15th April 2012
quotequote all
Blackpuddin said:
R300will said:
Zad said:
Cross-section area * velocity (in metres/second) * density of air at that altitude.

Air density @ sea level = 1.225 kg.m^3
Relative density @ 10,000M = 0.333
Mach 0.84 = 283m/s
Cross sectional area .. dunno, 150m^2?

That is approximately 17,000kg or 17 tonnes of air directly displaced.

As to indirect displacement, how much air the engines the move, or the drag induced on the system, that's a whole different kettle of fish and can of worms.
Beat me too it but i agree with the maths shown above.
I theng yow
Not quite....

What about the several tons of air sucked, squeezed, banged and blown out the back? Wouldn't that change the whole equation?

wink

otolith

56,266 posts

205 months

Sunday 15th April 2012
quotequote all
R300will said:
apparently so according to the story. i mean if you shape it right yes but that is displacement. if you are relying on pure density then i doubt any metal will foat, even mercury.
Several metals float - you almost certainly saw some of them float at school; sodium, potassium, lithium.

Not sure why you would think of mercury, it's pretty bloody dense stuff!

Zad

12,706 posts

237 months

Sunday 15th April 2012
quotequote all
Chuck328 said:
Blackpuddin said:
R300will said:
Zad said:
Cross-section area * velocity (in metres/second) * density of air at that altitude.

Air density @ sea level = 1.225 kg.m^3
Relative density @ 10,000M = 0.333
Mach 0.84 = 283m/s
Cross sectional area .. dunno, 150m^2?

That is approximately 17,000kg or 17 tonnes of air directly displaced.

As to indirect displacement, how much air the engines the move, or the drag induced on the system, that's a whole different kettle of fish and can of worms.
Beat me too it but i agree with the maths shown above.
I theng yow
Not quite....

What about the several tons of air sucked, squeezed, banged and blown out the back? Wouldn't that change the whole equation?

wink
Hence the part I wrote, highlighted in bold.

The original question was air "shoved aside".

R300will

3,799 posts

152 months

Sunday 15th April 2012
quotequote all
otolith said:
R300will said:
apparently so according to the story. i mean if you shape it right yes but that is displacement. if you are relying on pure density then i doubt any metal will foat, even mercury.
Several metals float - you almost certainly saw some of them float at school; sodium, potassium, lithium.

Not sure why you would think of mercury, it's pretty bloody dense stuff!
They are alkaline metals, not the transition metals i had in mind. The transition metals hold more of a metallic definition in my eyes but its a good shout although they don't really float for long as they dissolve/explode quickly. The samples i have seen stored in oil seem to be at the bottom of the flask though confused

Simpo Two

85,603 posts

266 months

Sunday 15th April 2012
quotequote all
R300will said:
otolith said:
R300will said:
apparently so according to the story. i mean if you shape it right yes but that is displacement. if you are relying on pure density then i doubt any metal will foat, even mercury.
Several metals float - you almost certainly saw some of them float at school; sodium, potassium, lithium.

Not sure why you would think of mercury, it's pretty bloody dense stuff!
They are alkaline metals, not the transition metals i had in mind. The transition metals hold more of a metallic definition in my eyes but its a good shout although they don't really float for long as they dissolve/explode quickly. The samples i have seen stored in oil seem to be at the bottom of the flask though confused
Let's face it, you chose mercury because it's a liquid at room temperature so you thought it was light and failed to note its position in the periodic table smile

otolith

56,266 posts

205 months

Sunday 15th April 2012
quotequote all
R300will said:
They are alkaline metals, not the transition metals i had in mind. The transition metals hold more of a metallic definition in my eyes but its a good shout although they don't really float for long as they dissolve/explode quickly. The samples i have seen stored in oil seem to be at the bottom of the flask though confused
Sure, but they're still metals. And they would still float if you gave them a thin coat of something waterproof.

They sink in oil because oil is less dense than they are (and less dense than water - we know that, oil also floats!)

Sodium is ~ .97g/cubic cm, the paraffin it is stored in is ~0.8g/cubic cm and water is (obviously) ~1.0g/cubic cm.

R300will

3,799 posts

152 months

Sunday 15th April 2012
quotequote all
otolith said:
R300will said:
They are alkaline metals, not the transition metals i had in mind. The transition metals hold more of a metallic definition in my eyes but its a good shout although they don't really float for long as they dissolve/explode quickly. The samples i have seen stored in oil seem to be at the bottom of the flask though confused
Sure, but they're still metals. And they would still float if you gave them a thin coat of something waterproof.

They sink in oil because oil is less dense than they are (and less dense than water - we know that, oil also floats!)

Sodium is ~ .97g/cubic cm, the paraffin it is stored in is ~0.8g/cubic cm and water is (obviously) ~1.0g/cubic cm.
Yes i am aware that oil is less dense than water, wasn't sure how much though. Which is the least dense alkaline metal?

Simpo Two

85,603 posts

266 months

Sunday 15th April 2012
quotequote all
Lithium I'd wager, being only third in the table.

H He Li Be B C N O F Ne
Na Mg Al Si P S Cl Ar


Le TVR

3,092 posts

252 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
17 tonnes for an A380? I assume thats 17 tonnes/second which seems remarkably low.

http://www.allstar.fiu.edu/aero/Flightrevisited.pd...

"Let us do a back-of-the-envelope calculation to see how much air a wing might divert. Take for
example a Cessna 172 that weighs about 2300 lb (1045 kg). Traveling at a speed of 140 mph (220
km/h), and assuming an effective angle of attack of 5 degrees, we get a vertical velocity for the air
of about 11.5 mph (18 km/h) right at the wing. If we assume that the average vertical velocity of
the air diverted is half that value we calculate from Newton's second law that the amount of air
diverted is on the order of 5 ton/s. Thus, a Cessna 172 at cruise is diverting about five times its
own weight in air per second to produce lift. Think how much air is diverted by a 250-ton Boeing
777."

Blackpuddin

Original Poster:

16,592 posts

206 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
that's what I'm after, thanks very much indeed

Zaxxon

4,057 posts

161 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
If it is displacing then the sums above look about right, but if it is 'shifting' or moving air then you need to counter in the amount of air sucked in and spat out of it's huge engines, which I should think is quite a bit.

Blackpuddin

Original Poster:

16,592 posts

206 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
displacement is fine, thanks to all