The Moon.

Author
Discussion

Simpo Two

85,538 posts

266 months

Tuesday 30th October 2012
quotequote all
The difference in elevation seems a lot for only 6 minutes time difference. It would be a better comparison if you took the photos at the same time each day.

deadtom

2,557 posts

166 months

Tuesday 30th October 2012
quotequote all


I'm just going to leave this here.

Galileo

3,145 posts

219 months

Tuesday 30th October 2012
quotequote all
deadtom said:


I'm just going to leave this here.
Very clever. Well done.

Mobsta

5,614 posts

256 months

Tuesday 30th October 2012
quotequote all
Galileo said:
Very clever. Well done.
What are you doing in a moon thread, Galileo? hehe

aw51 121565

4,771 posts

234 months

Wednesday 31st October 2012
quotequote all
PeanutHead said:
As it was a full moon i thought it would have been heavier than monday morning and so lower not higher, unless it was filled with hellium.
Ignore the, errm, naysayers (?) here...

The Moon takes approximately 29 days to complete a full orbit of the Earth - so it rises approximately 50 minutes later each day (the time between TWO high tides on average around the world, oddly enough wink ) and so if you'd taken your first photo on Monday at 5.44AM and your second photo on Tuesday (now yesterday wink ) at 6.34AM the moon would be in more or less the same position.

Try today (Wednesday) at 7.24AM if you get this message in time - or tomorrow (Thursday) at 8.14AM and the Moon should be in approximatrely the same position in the sky.

Could be some seconds (a minute or so by Friday) sooner, but you'll get the drift? smile

Post the pics up and you'll show what I'm saying. It's not about the moon being "heavier" when it's full - it weighs the same whether we can see it all (full moon) or not (new moon) and all variations inbetween; it's ALWAYS there, circling round the earth every 29 days smile .

Any questions on this, please come back to us - but viewing the moon as described will help, with photos if possible smile .