Making the desert bloom.

Making the desert bloom.

Author
Discussion

ATG

20,613 posts

273 months

Monday 3rd June 2013
quotequote all
aw51 121565 said:
Are you sure on this???

rofl
Long hair, bit scruffy, Irish ... something about cats wailing ... Yeah, Bob Marley

MartG

20,693 posts

205 months

Monday 3rd June 2013
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
You could save all that expense and complexity and just burn the local idle classes...
Are you related to Hitler at all ?

XM5ER

5,091 posts

249 months

Tuesday 4th June 2013
quotequote all
MartG said:
Simpo Two said:
You could save all that expense and complexity and just burn the local idle classes...
Are you related to Hitler at all ?
Hitler shunned him because of his extreme views smile

Countdown

Original Poster:

39,963 posts

197 months

Wednesday 5th June 2013
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
dirty boy said:
Slightly OT, but wasn't there a wealthy Arab type bloke in the late 70s early 80s who thought that if he planted thousands of trees he could create a rain forest and tried and failed?
What he and the OP are not seeing is that every area of Earth has its own natural climate - temperature, insolation (amount of sun), humidity, wind, soil/lack of. That controls what grows or doesn't grow there. Whatever you plant, nature will try to turn it back to what it was. That's why it was what it was in the first place - the natural conclusion of ecological succession. In this country you can go, with time, from sand to grass to scrub to small trees to deciduous forest, as that is our natural fauna. Do it in Brazil and you'll get tropical rain forest; do it in the Sahara and you'll get sand. The exception is when what you do changes the local climate, but that's a massive undertaking.
I do see it. However I'm just wondering how, as the human race, we can grow more food. The Sahara has loads of space, sunlight, and hungry people so my utopia would involve trying to turn it into productive farmland. We've put men on the moon, surely we can grow food in the desert, even if it's just dates smile

What about all the organic waste we produce? Wouldn't putting that in the desert support some sort of ecosystem?

What about all the grass available in the northern hemisphere? Couldn't we use that to increase beef and lamb production?

How bout large greenhouses to stop the sand and snakes getting in?

PlankWithANailIn

439 posts

150 months

Thursday 18th July 2013
quotequote all
I do not understand why do we need to produce so much food, we already have plenty and most places that don't have food do have the natural capacity to do so, its their idiotic leaders that cause the problems.

Simpo Two

85,526 posts

266 months

Thursday 18th July 2013
quotequote all
Like money, it's mostly about distribution. The West has (well had) plenty of money and food because they are generally well organised. As for the others, draw your own conclusions. There will always be rich and poor, fat and starving, clever and stupid. That's how the human race is and how it works.

maffski

1,868 posts

160 months

Friday 19th July 2013
quotequote all
Hugo a Gogo said:
convert the whole of Iceland into a seawater-to-hydrogen plant
I always thought we should have used the Icelandic bank bailouts to buy access to Iceland's geothermic resources - a long way for an electrical link but shipping hydrogen or hydrocarbons could have worked

qube_TA

8,402 posts

246 months

Friday 19th July 2013
quotequote all
How about:

Stick one end of a big long black pipe into the sea, use a solar powered pump to slowly suck water from sea into pipe.

Along the top of the pipe have reflective capillary pipes that bend round and join a second smaller pipe that's buried under the sand out of the way of heat, make this thermally insulated.

Water comes in to big pipe, heated by the sun, evaporates and is collected in the second pipe.

If the second pipe is slightly leaky then you'd irrigate the land with clean distilled water.

You'd have to filter the sea water coming in and it would require maintenance to clear it of salt to stop it clogging up, but the desalination process wouldn't require any energy other than what is provided by the Sun.

Blooming Desert


Boris Morris

496 posts

145 months

Friday 19th July 2013
quotequote all
One problem.


anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 19th July 2013
quotequote all
These massive irrigation projects are the way to go, they can't fail. Lets just forget about the Aral Sea.

qube_TA

8,402 posts

246 months

Friday 19th July 2013
quotequote all
Boris Morris said:
One problem.

wouldn't move that much if it was wet, plus the pipes would act as anchors.



Boris Morris

496 posts

145 months

Friday 19th July 2013
quotequote all
qube_TA said:
wouldn't move that much if it was wet, plus the pipes would act as anchors.
Areas that were dry might encroach onto areas that were wet. Bye-bye crops.

Simpo Two

85,526 posts

266 months

Friday 19th July 2013
quotequote all
qube_TA said:
Stick one end of a big long black pipe into the sea, use a solar powered pump to slowly suck water from sea into pipe.

Along the top of the pipe have reflective capillary pipes that bend round and join a second smaller pipe that's buried under the sand out of the way of heat, make this thermally insulated.

Water comes in to big pipe, heated by the sun, evaporates and is collected in the second pipe.

If the second pipe is slightly leaky then you'd irrigate the land with clean distilled water.
The point of a capilliary (ie very narrow) tube is that water goes up, to a small extent, because the molecules are attracted to the inner surfaces. What does that have to do with evaporation, and how does water evaporate in a closed pipe?

crossy67

1,570 posts

180 months

Saturday 20th July 2013
quotequote all
Countdown said:
That's an interesting idea. Look at what's happened historically. A-rabs rich in oil, dig it up, sell it and get rich. Ruskies rich in Gas, same thing. Maybe these poor desert countries will be the next Arab states experting the results of harvesting their single biggest natural resource?