Saturn images - Cassini

Saturn images - Cassini

Author
Discussion

Derek Smith

45,660 posts

248 months

Thursday 14th September 2017
quotequote all
There's half a dozen or so pages on Cassini in this week's New Scientist. Nothing new but makes a nice read.


jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Thursday 14th September 2017
quotequote all
20 hours until bye bye
Live update page
https://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/grand-finale/l...

We are 8 hours ahead of PDT



Edited by jmorgan on Thursday 14th September 17:05

jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Thursday 14th September 2017
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
There's half a dozen or so pages on Cassini in this week's New Scientist. Nothing new but makes a nice read.
Must admit to have got all my info on line, apart from Sky at Night magazine. New Scientist worth it?

Tonights program has a bit on it though, BBC 4. 19:30.

Eric Mc

122,031 posts

265 months

Thursday 14th September 2017
quotequote all
I'm going to use NASA Eyes to ride on Cassini as it plunges to its destruction.

Visions of Slim Pickens in "Dr Strangelove" somehow seem appropriate.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Thursday 14th September 2017
quotequote all
11 ish tomorrow if me maffs is right.

Final images around 3am GMT

http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Ca...

Edit. Last few minutes beamed back will be live from Saturn, video on the link above.

Edited by jmorgan on Thursday 14th September 17:17

funkyrobot

18,789 posts

228 months

Thursday 14th September 2017
quotequote all
cry

Derek Smith

45,660 posts

248 months

Thursday 14th September 2017
quotequote all
jmorgan said:
Derek Smith said:
There's half a dozen or so pages on Cassini in this week's New Scientist. Nothing new but makes a nice read.
Must admit to have got all my info on line, apart from Sky at Night magazine. New Scientist worth it?

Tonights program has a bit on it though, BBC 4. 19:30.
No, not worth it just for the Cassini article. I get NS every week and there's always something of interest and lots I struggle (and fail) to understand so worth it for that. The range of articles, news and comment is remarkable. You get the occasional week when you can read it all in a couple of hours, but they are rare.

The Cassini article is shallow, the best bit being quotes from those involved in the voyage. In some ways it was the weakest bit of the issue. I enjoyed reading it though. But then, what is there new to say? It was a bit of a eulogy.

I'll buy a book when it comes out - I presume one's being printed now - as I like printed images but, as you say, there's so much online.

It's been magic. And it dies tomorrow although I assume there's lots more to come from the data. There will be theories galore.

A sad day though.


jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Friday 15th September 2017
quotequote all
Some of the last raw images are in
Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute



jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Friday 15th September 2017
quotequote all

jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Friday 15th September 2017
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
No, not worth it just for the Cassini article. I get NS every week and there's always something of interest and lots I struggle (and fail) to understand so worth it for that. The range of articles, news and comment is remarkable. You get the occasional week when you can read it all in a couple of hours, but they are rare.

The Cassini article is shallow, the best bit being quotes from those involved in the voyage. In some ways it was the weakest bit of the issue. I enjoyed reading it though. But then, what is there new to say? It was a bit of a eulogy.

I'll buy a book when it comes out - I presume one's being printed now - as I like printed images but, as you say, there's so much online.

It's been magic. And it dies tomorrow although I assume there's lots more to come from the data. There will be theories galore.

A sad day though.
I was just wondering if New Scientist was worth it overall. Starting to pick up more on electronic magazines and thinking of spreading reading a bit (if they have that option)

Derek Smith

45,660 posts

248 months

Friday 15th September 2017
quotequote all
jmorgan said:
I was just wondering if New Scientist was worth it overall. Starting to pick up more on electronic magazines and thinking of spreading reading a bit (if they have that option)
I'm by no means profligate with money. In fact I worked out whether a subscription would be cheaper as I scan the NS before deciding to buy. It came out more or less even. I found about 20% have little interest for me.

However, what I like is the range of subjects covered. There are articles that I would not have read otherwise and the news section is always worth a read.

My library used to get it regularly but it kept being stolen so there's some positive feedback.

It took me a while to be a regular reader. I buy other magazines but none have the range of NS.

Some material is deep though and takes a lot of rereading. Or at least, that's what I find. Others, of course, might find these a little light.




jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Friday 15th September 2017
quotequote all
OK, ta.

Meanwhile.
https://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/grand-finale/l...

Explains the power drop off on the receiver.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Friday 15th September 2017
quotequote all
In theory, that is it. Gone.

MartG

20,678 posts

204 months

Friday 15th September 2017
quotequote all
Tissues at the ready frown


jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Friday 15th September 2017
quotequote all

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 15th September 2017
quotequote all
Those images are staggeringly beautiful.

Can't wait to see what the atmospheric data shows.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Friday 15th September 2017
quotequote all
Going to miss the live show on NASATV but can't wait to see the last moments as they came in.

If they got anything, the data rate was constant when I last checked.

MartG

20,678 posts

204 months

Friday 15th September 2017
quotequote all
DSN ( https://eyes.nasa.gov/dsn/dsn.html ) still showing data being received from Cassini, but nothing being transmitted to it

Krikkit

26,527 posts

181 months

Friday 15th September 2017
quotequote all
They gave it another 15-20 mins after they were expecting the breakup, but no point leaving an 18kW transmitter switched on for nothing!

Very cool that we can see the data rate and power states from DSN, keeping an eye as it goes to LOS in another 55 mins or so.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Friday 15th September 2017
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
They gave it another 15-20 mins after they were expecting the breakup, but no point leaving an 18kW transmitter switched on for nothing!

Very cool that we can see the data rate and power states from DSN, keeping an eye as it goes to LOS in another 55 mins or so.
No point transmitting when it is not there. If there is a TWT in the system then best kept hot anyway?