SpaceX Tuesday...

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

254 months

Thursday 28th September 2017
quotequote all
The FH will launch, they've pretty much finished the build of the first one

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

254 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

254 months

768

13,681 posts

96 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all
I really hope he can keep the momentum going.

There's something odd in that I don't doubt he'll get something to Mars for a second, but if he can make sub-hour flights to the other side of the world commercially viable I'll be even more amazed. At least someone's trying though.

Efbe

9,251 posts

166 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all
768 said:
I really hope he can keep the momentum going.

There's something odd in that I don't doubt he'll get something to Mars for a second, but if he can make sub-hour flights to the other side of the world commercially viable I'll be even more amazed. At least someone's trying though.
People are missing a dream, hopefully he can provide this. The closest we have had for a while has been edge-of-space flights(which I would love to do!).

There are no technical reasons why we can't do E2E in 30 mins. Just financial, and we have a world with more mill/billionaires than ever before.

768

13,681 posts

96 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all
Financial and political. Although maybe you can buy politics. smile

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

254 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all
Imagine the prestige of being the first city with a BFR port?

Fuel will probably cost more than a jet bot not a lot.

Eric Mc

122,031 posts

265 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
As Arthur C Clarke once said of such forms of transport, half the time the toilets will be out of order and the other half the toilets will be inaccessible.

XM5ER

5,091 posts

248 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
Cool. How much?

Question, if Musk succeeds with his neural lace (I hope he credits Ian M banks for that), then will there be a great need for this kind of travel?

Sylvaforever

2,212 posts

98 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
As Arthur C Clarke once said of such forms of transport, half the time the toilets will be out of order and the other half the toilets will be inaccessible.
27 minutes. Part of the pre boarding procedures lol

dxg

8,202 posts

260 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all
Can't help but think of the pollution it will generate: noise and air.

With the ticket prices serving the elite of the elite, I guess the pads are offshore just to keep the hoi polloi at bay!!!

dxg

8,202 posts

260 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
Imagine the prestige of being the first city with a BFR port?

Fuel will probably cost more than a jet bot not a lot.
Not much point in the being the *first* city with one wink

Network effects, my dear boy...

XM5ER

5,091 posts

248 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all
dxg said:
Can't help but think of the pollution it will generate: noise and air.

With the ticket prices serving the elite of the elite, I guess the pads are offshore just to keep the hoi polloi at bay!!!
The fuel they us is RP-1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RP-1

By products - Hydrocarbon combustion produces carbon dioxide (CO2), toxic carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbon (HC) emissions, and oxides of nitrogen (NOx), while hydrogen (H2) reacts with oxygen (O2) to produce only water (H2O), with some unreacted H2 also released.

Cant see Sadiq Khan letting one of those near his pure and virgin London air.

Eric Mc

122,031 posts

265 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all
The motors would only burn for around 15 minutes in total (lift off and landing). Compare that to the hours a jet plane has to burn fuel.

Other rocket motors can operate of hydrogen or methane, so reliance on RP-1 isn't compulsory. It's just easier.

Zoobeef

6,004 posts

158 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
The motors would only burn for around 15 minutes in total (lift off and landing). Compare that to the hours a jet plane has to burn fuel.

Other rocket motors can operate of hydrogen or methane, so reliance on RP-1 isn't compulsory. It's just easier.
Musk talks about using solar power here on earth to create methane. Trying to justify it to green peace biggrin

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

198 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all
Zoobeef said:
Eric Mc said:
The motors would only burn for around 15 minutes in total (lift off and landing). Compare that to the hours a jet plane has to burn fuel.

Other rocket motors can operate of hydrogen or methane, so reliance on RP-1 isn't compulsory. It's just easier.
Musk talks about using solar power here on earth to create methane. Trying to justify it to green peace biggrin
Once he has enough BFR's .. nothing to stop him just popping over to titan to slurp up lots of free fuel smile

lost in espace

6,161 posts

207 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all
Mars 2022: Cargo missions. "Not a typo".

Caruso

7,436 posts

256 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all
I wonder how the fuel consumption compares to a jet? As it is jets climb to 30,000+ ft to be able to go faster on less fuel where the air is thinner.

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

244 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all
lost in espace said:
Mars 2022: Cargo missions. "Not a typo".
"but may be a little aspirational" was, I think, the next line.

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

244 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all
XM5ER said:
The fuel they us is RP-1
BFR is slated to use the Raptor engine.; a full flow staged combustion design using methane and lox. Much less carbon.
The noise will remain an issue though.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED