SpaceX Tuesday...
Discussion
768 said:
I really hope he can keep the momentum going.
There's something odd in that I don't doubt he'll get something to Mars for a second, but if he can make sub-hour flights to the other side of the world commercially viable I'll be even more amazed. At least someone's trying though.
People are missing a dream, hopefully he can provide this. The closest we have had for a while has been edge-of-space flights(which I would love to do!).There's something odd in that I don't doubt he'll get something to Mars for a second, but if he can make sub-hour flights to the other side of the world commercially viable I'll be even more amazed. At least someone's trying though.
There are no technical reasons why we can't do E2E in 30 mins. Just financial, and we have a world with more mill/billionaires than ever before.
RobDickinson said:
As Arthur C Clarke once said of such forms of transport, half the time the toilets will be out of order and the other half the toilets will be inaccessible.RobDickinson said:
Cool. How much?Question, if Musk succeeds with his neural lace (I hope he credits Ian M banks for that), then will there be a great need for this kind of travel?
dxg said:
Can't help but think of the pollution it will generate: noise and air.
With the ticket prices serving the elite of the elite, I guess the pads are offshore just to keep the hoi polloi at bay!!!
The fuel they us is RP-1With the ticket prices serving the elite of the elite, I guess the pads are offshore just to keep the hoi polloi at bay!!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RP-1
By products - Hydrocarbon combustion produces carbon dioxide (CO2), toxic carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbon (HC) emissions, and oxides of nitrogen (NOx), while hydrogen (H2) reacts with oxygen (O2) to produce only water (H2O), with some unreacted H2 also released.
Cant see Sadiq Khan letting one of those near his pure and virgin London air.
Eric Mc said:
The motors would only burn for around 15 minutes in total (lift off and landing). Compare that to the hours a jet plane has to burn fuel.
Other rocket motors can operate of hydrogen or methane, so reliance on RP-1 isn't compulsory. It's just easier.
Musk talks about using solar power here on earth to create methane. Trying to justify it to green peace Other rocket motors can operate of hydrogen or methane, so reliance on RP-1 isn't compulsory. It's just easier.
Zoobeef said:
Eric Mc said:
The motors would only burn for around 15 minutes in total (lift off and landing). Compare that to the hours a jet plane has to burn fuel.
Other rocket motors can operate of hydrogen or methane, so reliance on RP-1 isn't compulsory. It's just easier.
Musk talks about using solar power here on earth to create methane. Trying to justify it to green peace Other rocket motors can operate of hydrogen or methane, so reliance on RP-1 isn't compulsory. It's just easier.
Gassing Station | Science! | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff