SpaceX Tuesday...
Discussion
MartG said:
p1stonhead said:
Can someone explain to me why it appears to be rotating in such a way if in reality its being shot out away from earth?
Does the plinth rotate or something to allow a view like that whilst its travelling away?
Edited by p1stonhead on Wednesday 7th February 11:10
p1stonhead said:
MartG said:
p1stonhead said:
Can someone explain to me why it appears to be rotating in such a way if in reality its being shot out away from earth?
Does the plinth rotate or something to allow a view like that whilst its travelling away?
Edited by p1stonhead on Wednesday 7th February 11:10
Toaster said:
Given that NASA has provided Space X with funding $400-$500M
NASA paid them for a service ( ISS resupply ) which they provided - they then used their profit to develop FH, just like any company which sells stuff uses part of the profit to develop new products.And this is why you don't put an expensive payload aboard the first flight of a new vehicle https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_yguLapgA
I essentially ignore Toaster on here as he is, to put it mildly, a negatively minded, cantankerous old moaning Minnie.
I've had enough of people like him to be honest.
Let him denigrate all he likes. This is a marvellous event and there will be more to come from SpaceX and the Falcon Heavy - of that I am sure.
I've had enough of people like him to be honest.
Let him denigrate all he likes. This is a marvellous event and there will be more to come from SpaceX and the Falcon Heavy - of that I am sure.
MartG said:
NASA paid them for a service ( ISS resupply ) which they provided - they then used their profit to develop FH, just like any company which sells stuff uses part of the profit to develop new products.
And this is why you don't put an expensive payload aboard the first flight of a new vehicle https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_yguLapgA
I never said an expensive payload I am sure that there are many others out there that are happy with commercial riskAnd this is why you don't put an expensive payload aboard the first flight of a new vehicle https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_yguLapgA
FurtiveFreddy said:
p1stonhead said:
Can someone explain to me why it appears to be rotating in such a way if in reality its being shot out away from earth?
Does the plinth rotate or something to allow a view like that whilst its travelling away?
Edited by p1stonhead on Wednesday 7th February 11:10
I've read that the 2nd burn was deliberately timed to be visible from California, so SpaceX employees in Hawthorn could see it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz0Asmdo4hA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz0Asmdo4hA
Eric Mc said:
I essentially ignore Toaster on here as he is, to put it mildly, a negatively minded, cantankerous old moaning Minnie.
I've had enough of people like him to be honest.
Let him denigrate all he likes. This is a marvellous event and there will be more to come from SpaceX and the Falcon Heavy - of that I am sure.
Agree 100%. Knowledge evolves constantly and we need pioneers. History will deal kindly with Musk long after he is gone.I've had enough of people like him to be honest.
Let him denigrate all he likes. This is a marvellous event and there will be more to come from SpaceX and the Falcon Heavy - of that I am sure.
mattyn1 said:
FurtiveFreddy said:
p1stonhead said:
Can someone explain to me why it appears to be rotating in such a way if in reality its being shot out away from earth?
Does the plinth rotate or something to allow a view like that whilst its travelling away?
Edited by p1stonhead on Wednesday 7th February 11:10
SystemParanoia said:
If not careful ?
what are you on about they've already done it.. being careful now changes nothing ?
Think about it... they tested their space suit in the van Allen heavy radiation zone for several hours and again out in deep space in the ultimate endurance test.
More than NASA ever did with their own
There's also an Ark of all human knowledge in the boot, and hitch hikers guide to the galaxy in the glove box... with a towel
the alternative to using the car and it being an event that engages people young and old all over the world firing off their imaginations and inspiring a new generation of STEM and science majors..
is this
a 2 Tonne cube of steel Ballast ... exciting
They could have sent an inanimate carbon rod!what are you on about they've already done it.. being careful now changes nothing ?
Think about it... they tested their space suit in the van Allen heavy radiation zone for several hours and again out in deep space in the ultimate endurance test.
More than NASA ever did with their own
There's also an Ark of all human knowledge in the boot, and hitch hikers guide to the galaxy in the glove box... with a towel
the alternative to using the car and it being an event that engages people young and old all over the world firing off their imaginations and inspiring a new generation of STEM and science majors..
is this
a 2 Tonne cube of steel Ballast ... exciting
Edited by SystemParanoia on Wednesday 7th February 09:35
Eric Mc said:
I essentially ignore Toaster on here as he is, to put it mildly, a negatively minded, cantankerous old moaning Minnie.
I've had enough of people like him to be honest.
Let him denigrate all he likes. This is a marvellous event and there will be more to come from SpaceX and the Falcon Heavy - of that I am sure.
. I've had enough of people like him to be honest.
Let him denigrate all he likes. This is a marvellous event and there will be more to come from SpaceX and the Falcon Heavy - of that I am sure.
"People like him" Who exactly do you think you are, and what makes you think and feel you can make such a nasty comment......Those who have opposite views to you are not dirt on your shoes, it is OK to think this is just more junk humans have placed in space.
I am also proud to think differently to you Eric and not be suckered in by hype and hysteria it was a triumphant launch but why the space junk.
Toaster said:
Eric Mc said:
I essentially ignore Toaster on here as he is, to put it mildly, a negatively minded, cantankerous old moaning Minnie.
I've had enough of people like him to be honest.
Let him denigrate all he likes. This is a marvellous event and there will be more to come from SpaceX and the Falcon Heavy - of that I am sure.
. I've had enough of people like him to be honest.
Let him denigrate all he likes. This is a marvellous event and there will be more to come from SpaceX and the Falcon Heavy - of that I am sure.
"People like him" Who exactly do you think you are, and what makes you think and feel you can make such a nasty comment......Those who have opposite views to you are not dirt on your shoes, it is OK to think this is just more junk humans have placed in space.
I am also proud to think differently to you Eric and not be suckered in by hype and hysteria it was a triumphant launch but why the space junk.
if you converted the mass of earth into individual grains of sand and spread it all over the solar system... it would not be noticeable, and at the same time no grain would come into contact with another for millenia... or more!
Toaster said:
Eric Mc said:
I essentially ignore Toaster on here as he is, to put it mildly, a negatively minded, cantankerous old moaning Minnie.
I've had enough of people like him to be honest.
Let him denigrate all he likes. This is a marvellous event and there will be more to come from SpaceX and the Falcon Heavy - of that I am sure.
. I've had enough of people like him to be honest.
Let him denigrate all he likes. This is a marvellous event and there will be more to come from SpaceX and the Falcon Heavy - of that I am sure.
"People like him" Who exactly do you think you are, and what makes you think and feel you can make such a nasty comment......Those who have opposite views to you are not dirt on your shoes, it is OK to think this is just more junk humans have placed in space.
I am also proud to think differently to you Eric and not be suckered in by hype and hysteria it was a triumphant launch but why the space junk.
With Eric.
Shove off Toaster.
Hats off to SpaceX. Fantastic. Don't understand people knocking the achievement - scientific progress has always been in part 'standing on the shoulders of giants' has it not?
How cool was it when the boosters landed!?! ..... that was absolutely fantastic! Just mind blowing stuff really, SO impressive
Another bonus was how unbelievable the coverage was ..... except for the nerd doing the nasal commentary over the actual flight pictures - I can bet the word 'nominal' has never before been intended to make anything sound really, really exciting! (".... and the boosters are .... NOMINAL!!") I remember watching the back end of the Apollo programme and live pictures were definitely 'of their time'! Even moving on to the first flight of the Space Shuttle things weren't that different, but new technology has definitely brought the experience into much more vivid focus - literally and metaphorically.
One thing I will say though - and I'm not having a go or denigrating the achievement in any way - I remember watching (just) the first flight of the space shuttle (Michael Rodd (cue schoolboy giggling ) presented it IIRC) and I felt palpably more excitement and tension on the build up to the launch because you knew there were actual human beings putting it all on the line. I'm not saying they should have stuck someone on FH just to make it more exciting, by the way, but achievement by a human being will always be more impressive and awe inspiring than achievement by an autonomous machine (F1 take note) ..... just sayin', not complainin'
How cool was it when the boosters landed!?! ..... that was absolutely fantastic! Just mind blowing stuff really, SO impressive
Another bonus was how unbelievable the coverage was ..... except for the nerd doing the nasal commentary over the actual flight pictures - I can bet the word 'nominal' has never before been intended to make anything sound really, really exciting! (".... and the boosters are .... NOMINAL!!") I remember watching the back end of the Apollo programme and live pictures were definitely 'of their time'! Even moving on to the first flight of the Space Shuttle things weren't that different, but new technology has definitely brought the experience into much more vivid focus - literally and metaphorically.
One thing I will say though - and I'm not having a go or denigrating the achievement in any way - I remember watching (just) the first flight of the space shuttle (Michael Rodd (cue schoolboy giggling ) presented it IIRC) and I felt palpably more excitement and tension on the build up to the launch because you knew there were actual human beings putting it all on the line. I'm not saying they should have stuck someone on FH just to make it more exciting, by the way, but achievement by a human being will always be more impressive and awe inspiring than achievement by an autonomous machine (F1 take note) ..... just sayin', not complainin'
CraigyMc said:
Toaster said:
Eric Mc said:
I essentially ignore Toaster on here as he is, to put it mildly, a negatively minded, cantankerous old moaning Minnie.
I've had enough of people like him to be honest.
Let him denigrate all he likes. This is a marvellous event and there will be more to come from SpaceX and the Falcon Heavy - of that I am sure.
. I've had enough of people like him to be honest.
Let him denigrate all he likes. This is a marvellous event and there will be more to come from SpaceX and the Falcon Heavy - of that I am sure.
"People like him" Who exactly do you think you are, and what makes you think and feel you can make such a nasty comment......Those who have opposite views to you are not dirt on your shoes, it is OK to think this is just more junk humans have placed in space.
I am also proud to think differently to you Eric and not be suckered in by hype and hysteria it was a triumphant launch but why the space junk.
With Eric.
Shove off Toaster.
‘Space junk’
Jesus wept
Toaster said:
.
and not be suckered in by hype and hysteria it was a triumphant launch but why the space junk.
Well Space X aren't NASA, they have a product to sell, and its their dime to have some fun with. I honestly can't see the issue you are repeatedly driving at. and not be suckered in by hype and hysteria it was a triumphant launch but why the space junk.
Others have pointed to the complete loss of expensive "science" on untested platforms, yet you persist. I know you think Falcon is "just miniaturized components and using old proven tech" Let's face it - if it had some serious science onboard and had blown to pieces on launch you would have been FIRST in the queue to criticise Elon for not testing adequately.
Personally I am very happy to see the nodding references to Sci Fi, and a light-hearted touch to this test.
The twin booster landing was just incredible - goes a bit further in development than just recycling someone else's ideas as you claim.
Gassing Station | Science! | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff