SpaceX Tuesday...

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

262 months

Monday 19th March 2018
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Ironically 1900 was the peak of electric car popularity before ICE started to take over.

Toaster

2,939 posts

194 months

Wednesday 21st March 2018
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
Ironically 1900 was the peak of electric car popularity before ICE started to take over.
My milk was always delivered by an electric vehicle, they swapped about 10 years ago to diesel trucks but thats because fewer people are having milk delivered (Longer rounds). If the milk rounds last I'm sure they will go back to electric as it will ultimately be cheaper.

FurtiveFreddy

8,577 posts

238 months

Wednesday 21st March 2018
quotequote all
Toaster said:
My milk was always delivered by an electric vehicle, they swapped about 10 years ago to diesel trucks but thats because fewer people are having milk delivered (Longer rounds). If the milk rounds last I'm sure they will go back to electric as it will ultimately be cheaper.
In an effort to drag this thread back on-topic, the astronauts on the ISS are probably the only people to have their milk delivered by a Falcon 9...

annodomini2

6,868 posts

252 months

Wednesday 21st March 2018
quotequote all
Toaster said:
Dr Jekyll said:
Ironically 1900 was the peak of electric car popularity before ICE started to take over.
My milk was always delivered by an electric vehicle, they swapped about 10 years ago to diesel trucks but thats because fewer people are having milk delivered (Longer rounds). If the milk rounds last I'm sure they will go back to electric as it will ultimately be cheaper.
Still have the electric floats round where I live.

Beati Dogu

8,900 posts

140 months

Wednesday 21st March 2018
quotequote all
They only use electric floats because they're quiet. (obvs)

The horses that used to pull milk floats were trained to move up in pace with the milkman, as he did his rounds.

Perhaps a self driving mode to emulate that would be the logical next step.

Teslas are working on a pick up truck, so maybe we should ask Elon to consider it. wink

djdest

6,542 posts

179 months

Friday 23rd March 2018
quotequote all
Musk had deleted both Space X and Tesla Facebook pages, he claimed he didn’t know they existed, which seems a bit odd!
Shame, the Space X one was one of very few pages I follow on there. Might as well delete mine now too!

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

255 months

Friday 23rd March 2018
quotequote all
They'll probably have a social media person doing that

Beati Dogu

8,900 posts

140 months

Friday 23rd March 2018
quotequote all
Excellent news. Facebook is dying anyway, but if this helps end it faster, then all the better.

CraigyMc

16,438 posts

237 months

Saturday 24th March 2018
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
Facebook is dying anyway
Citation needed.

Kccv23highliftcam

1,783 posts

76 months

Saturday 24th March 2018
quotequote all
CraigyMc said:
Beati Dogu said:
Facebook is dying anyway
Citation needed.
It may be stagnating [or starting to ] in the western world as people wake up from being sheeple, but in asia and the east its "quite" popular...

Beati Dogu

8,900 posts

140 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
Coming up this week from Vandenberg AFB .... a Falcon 9 launch on Thursday 29th March - "Iridium NEXT flight 5"

The time is supposed to be 3.19 pm UK (7.19 am local) and the weather looks good.

The static fire was completed on Sunday.

The first stage has already flown before (Iridium NEXT flight 3, last October).

Unfortunately, it doesn't have the juice to get back to Vandenberg & the west coast landing ship seems to be unserviceable.

It does look like they will be trying to catch at least one of the fairings though. Mr Steven has been out on exercise recently and is currently back in the port of Los Angeles to get its net fitted. The support ships are berthed near to the proposed BFR factory actually.

p1stonhead

25,584 posts

168 months

Tuesday 27th March 2018
quotequote all
This is a LOT of water yikes



"Water flowed during a test at Launch Complex 39B at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. About 450,000 gallons of water flowed at high speed from a holding tank through new and modified piping and valves, the flame trench, flame deflector nozzles and mobile launcher interface risers during a wet flow test at Launch Complex 39B. At peak flow, the water reached about 100 feet in the air above the pad surface. The test was a milestone to confirm and baseline the performance of the Ignition Overpressure/Sound Suppression system. During launch of NASA's Space Launch System rocket and Orion spacecraft, the high-speed water flow will help protect the vehicle from the extreme acoustic and temperature environment during ignition and liftoff."

Beati Dogu

8,900 posts

140 months

Tuesday 27th March 2018
quotequote all
^ All they need now is a rocket.

djdest

6,542 posts

179 months

Tuesday 27th March 2018
quotequote all
There was an article on the sky news app this morning about NASA saying that Falcon Heavy was no good for their missions as it is too small

MartG

20,696 posts

205 months

Tuesday 27th March 2018
quotequote all
Thursday's launch postponed due to a payload issue

https://twitter.com/IridiumBoss/status/97870967155...

MartG

20,696 posts

205 months

Tuesday 27th March 2018
quotequote all
djdest said:
There was an article on the sky news app this morning about NASA saying that Falcon Heavy was no good for their missions as it is too small
Pretty sure it has a similar sized fairing to its current competitors 13.1m high x 5.2m wide

Kccv23highliftcam

1,783 posts

76 months

Tuesday 27th March 2018
quotequote all
djdest said:
There was an article on the sky news app this morning about NASA saying that Falcon Heavy was no good for their missions as it is too small

Of course.

The surprise is anyone is surprised.

ninja-lewis

4,250 posts

191 months

Tuesday 27th March 2018
quotequote all
djdest said:
There was an article on the sky news app this morning about NASA saying that Falcon Heavy was no good for their missions as it is too small
BTL comment on Ars Technica:

said:
The SLS is required in order to build the Lunar Orbiting Platform-Gateway, because the Lunar Orbiting Platform-Gateway was designed to require SLS. Also it hasn't been designed yet, but when it is it will require SLS. Funding for designing it hasn't been allocated yet, but if and when it is, it will be on the basis that it require SLS. As you can see, SLS is clearly required by SLS requirements and Falcon Heavy is not SLS and so therefore does not meet the requirements of being SLS.

Beati Dogu

8,900 posts

140 months

Tuesday 27th March 2018
quotequote all
"By some estimates, NASA could afford 17 to 27 Falcon Heavy launches a year for what it is paying annually to develop the SLS rocket"

https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/03/nasa-chief...

Beati Dogu

8,900 posts

140 months

Wednesday 28th March 2018
quotequote all
MartG said:
Thursday's launch postponed due to a payload issue

https://twitter.com/IridiumBoss/status/97870967155...
Issue now resolved and the launch set for Friday 30th.

The problem was with a ground harness test cable apparently.

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED