Saturn V anecdote

Author
Discussion

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

255 months

Tuesday 9th April 2019
quotequote all
Ended up in the Brisbane science museum last week with a Nasa manned Spaceflight exhibition.

Was awesome plenty of flown hardware, wasn't supposed to take pics but I snuck a couple of the saturn V computer bits.





Overall well worth a look round, a used Apollo parachute hangibg from the ceiling was awesome

Beati Dogu

8,896 posts

140 months

Tuesday 9th April 2019
quotequote all
Pretty cool. Most of the gear is dotted around the USA.

I've see the Apollo 10 capsule in in the Science Museum in London (its lunar lander "Snoopy" is still out there somewhere, in a heliocentric orbit).
I remember seeing some hardware, including a lunar buggy in Teheran of all places.


MartG said:
Which one do you want then ?

I saw something the other day commemorating the agreement to sell Polaris missiles to the UK - on 6 April 1963.

MartG

Original Poster:

20,689 posts

205 months

Saturday 13th April 2019
quotequote all
Watching an old video of an Ariane 3 launch ( researching for a model kit ) - interesting to note that the solid boosters were only ignited after the vehicle had already lifted off under the power of the core stage engines. First time I've heard of this being done - perhaps it saved the pad from needing to be modified

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrXwSFSWulo

MartG

Original Poster:

20,689 posts

205 months

Monday 22nd April 2019
quotequote all
From Stephen Coester:

"All of us who worked on the Launch Pad during Apollo took continuous safety courses in things like safety showers/eye washes, Scott Airpack breathing, safety harnesses, hazardous gases, pad egress, etc.

My favorite was always fire training. We would learn to use fire extinguishers on small fires and hoses on actual large oil fires.

I had done this course every year and while exciting was relatively safe. Well one year we were fighting fires and the day was extremely windy with about a 30 mph north wind. One drill was for five guys to follow a trail which had several small fires. The first and last had extinguishers and the center three were just along for the ride. Well, on this day the wind had whipped the flames to 20 feet high and I questioned the professionals whether it was safe. They said to quit being a chicken and go for it.

We entered the trail with me being the last guy all of us in coveralls, gloves, and breathing apparatus. The first guy attempted to knock down the first raging fire, but it flared right up. I hit it with my extinguisher to no effect. Suddenly we were surrounded by a wall of flame and all discipline was lost. We all bailed out through the wall of fire.

The fire fighters called us together to chew us out for our failure, but by this time I realized that all my exposed skin was feeling hot. I told them I needed to go to Medical and they said nonsense. I insisted and another engineer said he was also burned. At Medical they took it seriously and quickly applied ice water pads to our burns.

The other engineer was burned worse than me, but both of us lost all the skin on our necks, ears, wrists and anywhere not covered. The medical personnel said we were within seconds of being burned to death.

After the "smoke" cleared the Fire Chief in charge was fired and they toned down this safety course.

Life was sure exciting back then."

MartG

Original Poster:

20,689 posts

205 months

Thursday 25th April 2019
quotequote all
Bit of a sad one about the end of the Saturn V programme from J Harvey LeBlanc



  • **The End of the Historic Apollo/Saturn Programs****
Our North American Aviation plant in Downey, CA. had approximately 25,000 workers at the height of the Apollo/Saturn Programs in the 1960s. We were working on both the Apollo and the second stage (S-II) of the mighty Saturn V Rocket at the same facility. The facility was a real beehive of activity and it was like working in a city within a city.
Several thousand of us working on the S-II Program were eventually moved to a new facility in Seal Beach, CA., about 17 miles south of Downey. This was where the S-II stages were assembled and the location provided easy access to the ocean for barge shipment of the huge stages. The S-II stages were sent to the Mississippi Test Facility for static firing test before being sent to the Kennedy Space Center for the moon launches. During this time period, I was working in the Ground Support Equipment (GSE) Design Department for the S-II. We were responsible for the designs of hundreds of items, such as: complex pneumatic and cryogenic fuel servicing systems, liquid hydrogen heat exchangers, massive ground to vehicle umbilical disconnect plates, leak detection and checkout systems, electronic control and checkout consoles, handling equipment for hoisting and moving the S-II stage, etc. At its peak, this group had about 600 Designers and support personnel. By the time we started launching Apollos to the moon, the magnitude of the design effort had been greatly reduced and the manpower reductions started. By the launch of Apollo 17, the last moon mission in December of 1972, layoffs had really gotten commonplace. Fridays came with a great deal of apprehension as each of us waited to see if we would be one of the hundreds to get a layoff pink slip. Those selected employees would line up at the guard shack gates to be handed their termination papers and final pay check. It was really heart breaking to see the shocked and stunned look on their faces, many of them in tears. They all knew that the market was being flooded with engineers and that they would have a hard time finding a job. There was always a large horde of news reporters with their cameras trying to capture images of those poor employees in their misery. It was extremely upsetting to hear them asking dumb questions like “tell me how you feel about being laid-off?”
During this time period the primary criteria for being retained in Design Engineering was your design experience and the criticality of the equipment you had designed for the program. I was very fortunate in that I had been involved in the design of pneumatic servicing equipment from the beginning of the program. These systems were very complex and were used at test facilities in Huntsville, AL., the Mississippi Test Facility and also on the launch pad at The Kennedy Space Center. It provided 46 launch critical functions to the S-II stage during launch. It also helped that I was on the S-II Launch Support Team and had a great deal of experience troubleshooting problems with the ground and stage systems.
After the last launch, I was assigned the task of leading a group of engineers in documenting the S-II Program Technology Retention for Ground Support Equipment (GSE). NASA felt that we had made significant advancements in the designs of GSE fluid systems, structures, components and system technology. They wanted us to provide a historical synopsis of “lessons learned” in the design, development and operational experience for the most critical items of GSE. This valuable information was to be utilized on future space programs. I completed this task in September of 1973 and was the author of a 518 page report with my findings. Later, it was very gratifying to see my report being utilized for many years on the Space Shuttle Program. The information contained in that report prevented many designers from having to “reinvent the wheel” when they were faced with similar design challenges.
Shortly after the completion of my work on that report, in 1973, I was transferred to the new Space Shuttle Program as a Lead Design Engineer in Propulsion Fluid Systems. When I finally left the S-II Program, I was one of the last 7 engineers remaining out of the original 600 in our Design Department!

MartG

Original Poster:

20,689 posts

205 months

Saturday 27th April 2019
quotequote all
Seems that Apollo 10's discarded LM ascent stage may have been located

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6965985/A...

Beati Dogu

8,896 posts

140 months

Sunday 28th April 2019
quotequote all
That’s pretty cool. I like how the command module’s call sign was “Charlie Brown” too.

Any talk of bringing it back is just ridiculous though.

There was a good documentary on the Smithsonian Channel last night about how Grumman developed the lander. NASA took the first one to bits and found all sorts of issues with it like leaky welds and pipe work. One of the windows disintegrated under pressure testing too.

Silver Smudger

3,299 posts

168 months

Sunday 28th April 2019
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
...There was a good documentary on the Smithsonian Channel last night about how Grumman developed the lander. NASA took the first one to bits and found all sorts of issues with it like leaky welds and pipe work. One of the windows disintegrated under pressure testing too.
Which probably explains John Glenn's famous line -

‘I felt exactly how you would feel if you were getting ready to launch and knew you were sitting on top of 2 million parts — all built by the lowest bidder on a government contract.’

Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Sunday 28th April 2019
quotequote all
Silver Smudger said:
Which probably explains John Glenn's famous line -

‘I felt exactly how you would feel if you were getting ready to launch and knew you were sitting on top of 2 million parts — all built by the lowest bidder on a government contract.’
Except I always heard it was Gus Grissom who said it - and, of course, it wasn't true anyway. The lowest bidders didn't always get the contracts.

Beati Dogu

8,896 posts

140 months

Sunday 28th April 2019
quotequote all
When they took the Apollo 1 capsule apart after the disaster, they discovered all sorts of issues with it as well. They even found a socket wrench left over from the construction, within the airframe (North American Aviation this time).


Gene Kranz's speech to the mission control team after the fire:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zjAteaK9lM

Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Sunday 28th April 2019
quotequote all
They had been concerned about the quality of North American's work for almost two years BEFORE the fire. They commissioned an investigation BEFORE the fire into North American and let them know that they were close to losing the contract - although how serious that threat would ever be never transpired because the fire intervened.

North American had actually come second in the original assessment for building the Command Service module but James Webb exercised his power to overturn the procurement committee decision on the basis that they had an excellent track record with large, experimental programmes such as the X-15 and XB-70.

MartG

Original Poster:

20,689 posts

205 months

Sunday 28th April 2019
quotequote all

Beati Dogu

8,896 posts

140 months

Sunday 28th April 2019
quotequote all
It's amazing the detail they have to think about.

MartG

Original Poster:

20,689 posts

205 months

Monday 29th April 2019
quotequote all


The LH2 tank shown here in its original tan and white colors held 850000 gallons. We got the LH2 from Louisiana in two types of tankers. One looked pretty much like any cylindrical tanker and held 5000 gallons of LH2. The other had a rectangular cross section and held 10000 gallons minus a bunch of boil off waste on the trip to KSC. So roughly a hundred plus tanker loads to completely fill the tank. Each vehicle launch consumed about 400000 gallons; 260000 gallons in the S-II and 67000 in the S-IVB plus loss to boiloff. We could offload five tankers at a time into the storage tank. The five fill ports are on the white pipe in the right foreground of the photo. I spent many hours standing there directing the tanker offload operation during the Apollo SaturnV program. The boil off from the vacuum jacketed storage tank was several hundred gallons a day so roughly a tanker every couple of weeks. We'd completely fill the storage tank after each launch or tanking (CDDT) and then monitor to make sure we had enough for the next launch, or else we would call in more tankers.

Stephen Coester

andy_s

19,403 posts

260 months

Monday 29th April 2019
quotequote all
This may be of interest to rocket-hounds: https://www.space.com/apollo-11-photographs-book.h...

MartG

Original Poster:

20,689 posts

205 months

Wednesday 1st May 2019
quotequote all
A bit off topic - NASA has found that the loss of two satellites was due to a supplier falsifying test certification results frown

https://www.americaspace.com/2019/04/30/nasa-finds...

When the total cost of the payload loss is taken into account they seem to be getting off lightly. I wonder if their product is in any other spacecraft

Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Wednesday 1st May 2019
quotequote all
There seems to be a serious malaise within the US aerospace certification process system.

MartG

Original Poster:

20,689 posts

205 months

Wednesday 1st May 2019
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
There seems to be a serious malaise within the US aerospace certification process system.
And yet they are always very quick to criticise Russian manufacturers for similar issues frown

Beati Dogu

8,896 posts

140 months

Thursday 9th May 2019
quotequote all
Here's a 3D model & guide to the Apollo command module:

https://3d.si.edu/apollo11cm?fbclid=IwAR3-i3DXxRco...

Fly around and zoom in & out as required. It might take minute or two to load.

C350

1,848 posts

65 months

Sunday 12th May 2019
quotequote all
Goonhilly Earth Station are having a 50th anniversary event for the moon landing as they relayed the live footage.
Lots of stuff to see and do, full info here:
https://www.cornwalllive.com/whats-on/music-nightl...

It’s only an hour away for me, so will definitely be going