Climate Change - The Scientific Debate (Vol. II)

Climate Change - The Scientific Debate (Vol. II)

Author
Discussion

Gadgetmac

14,984 posts

109 months

Friday 9th October 2020
quotequote all
Kawasicki said:
Gadgetmac said:
It’s not “lakes will freeze less in winter” it’s lakes ARE freezing less in winter NOW and at an accelerating rate - it’s another signpost.

If you’re not impressed or even interested in that then I’d suggest ignoring it and not bothering to make waste-of-bandwidth posts but you don’t seem able to do that.

This is the science thread, the latest science research has a home here, I’d get used to it.
Do you have anything scientifically interesting to post? Should I be impressed with the discovery that lakes ARE freezing less in the winter. Winter is getting warmer, it isn’t exactly ground braking research.


Gadgetmac

14,984 posts

109 months

Saturday 10th October 2020
quotequote all
More climate science ahoy...

Climate change responsible for record sea temperature levels, says study

https://phys.org/news/2020-10-climate-responsible-...

First few paras...

Global warming is driving an unprecedented rise in sea temperatures including in the Mediterranean, according to a major new report published by the peer-reviewed Journal of Operational Oceanography.

Data from the European Union's (EU) Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service (CMEMS) will increase concerns about the threat to the world's seas and oceans from climate change.

The Ocean State Report reveals an overall trend globally of surface warming based on evidence from 1993 to 2018, with the largest rise in the Arctic Ocean.

European seas experienced record high temperatures in 2018, a phenomenon which the researchers attribute to extreme weather conditions—a marine heat wave lasting several months.

Kawasicki

13,093 posts

236 months

Saturday 10th October 2020
quotequote all
Gadgetmac said:
More climate science ahoy...

Climate change responsible for record sea temperature levels, says study

https://phys.org/news/2020-10-climate-responsible-...

First few paras...

Global warming is driving an unprecedented rise in sea temperatures including in the Mediterranean, according to a major new report published by the peer-reviewed Journal of Operational Oceanography.

Data from the European Union's (EU) Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service (CMEMS) will increase concerns about the threat to the world's seas and oceans from climate change.

The Ocean State Report reveals an overall trend globally of surface warming based on evidence from 1993 to 2018, with the largest rise in the Arctic Ocean.

European seas experienced record high temperatures in 2018, a phenomenon which the researchers attribute to extreme weather conditions—a marine heat wave lasting several months.
Unprecedented rise in temperatures...

...since 1993.

laugh

(Yes, that’s my scientific feedback.)



Gadgetmac

14,984 posts

109 months

Sunday 11th October 2020
quotequote all
Kawasicki said:
Gadgetmac said:
More climate science ahoy...

Climate change responsible for record sea temperature levels, says study

https://phys.org/news/2020-10-climate-responsible-...

First few paras...

Global warming is driving an unprecedented rise in sea temperatures including in the Mediterranean, according to a major new report published by the peer-reviewed Journal of Operational Oceanography.

Data from the European Union's (EU) Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service (CMEMS) will increase concerns about the threat to the world's seas and oceans from climate change.

The Ocean State Report reveals an overall trend globally of surface warming based on evidence from 1993 to 2018, with the largest rise in the Arctic Ocean.

European seas experienced record high temperatures in 2018, a phenomenon which the researchers attribute to extreme weather conditions—a marine heat wave lasting several months.
Unprecedented rise in temperatures...

...since 1993.

laugh

(Yes, that’s my scientific feedback.)
I'd stick to your conspiracy theories then...

Kawasicki said:
I’m also pretty sure the scientists can keep up this facade for a long, long time.
rofl



Kawasicki

13,093 posts

236 months

Sunday 11th October 2020
quotequote all
"The new Cedrela chronologies from the Amazon, when compared with the hundreds of tree-ring chronologies in temperate North and South America, document this Pan American resonance of climate and ecosystem extremes in the centuries before widespread deforestation or human-caused climate change“

Can anyone see an AGW signal? Anyone?

The researchers can...
“In the past 40 years, drought and flood extremes have increased in the Amazon basin, the researchers noted, raising the question of whether human-induced climate change and deforestation are affecting Amazon climate.“

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/10/2010...

https://youtu.be/YEGJDvdwAu8

The researchers have come to a conclusion CLEARLY not supported by their own data. Why?

Kawasicki

13,093 posts

236 months

Sunday 11th October 2020
quotequote all
Gadgetmac said:
Kawasicki said:
Gadgetmac said:
More climate science ahoy...

Climate change responsible for record sea temperature levels, says study

https://phys.org/news/2020-10-climate-responsible-...

First few paras...

Global warming is driving an unprecedented rise in sea temperatures including in the Mediterranean, according to a major new report published by the peer-reviewed Journal of Operational Oceanography.

Data from the European Union's (EU) Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service (CMEMS) will increase concerns about the threat to the world's seas and oceans from climate change.

The Ocean State Report reveals an overall trend globally of surface warming based on evidence from 1993 to 2018, with the largest rise in the Arctic Ocean.

European seas experienced record high temperatures in 2018, a phenomenon which the researchers attribute to extreme weather conditions—a marine heat wave lasting several months.
Unprecedented rise in temperatures...

...since 1993.

laugh

(Yes, that’s my scientific feedback.)
I'd stick to your conspiracy theories then...

Kawasicki said:
I’m also pretty sure the scientists can keep up this facade for a long, long time.
rofl
Try to stick to the science, it’s clearly a bit thin in substance, but don’t give up.

Keep the posts coming, they are very illuminating.

Gadgetmac

14,984 posts

109 months

Sunday 11th October 2020
quotequote all
Kawasicki said:
Try to stick to the science, it’s clearly a bit thin in substance, but don’t give up.

Keep the posts coming, they are very illuminating.
What's REALLY illuminating is now we know what your base line is. No wonder you argue against every single SCIENCE paper published on here.

I'll continue to post them you continue to don your tin foil hat.

Kawasicki

13,093 posts

236 months

Sunday 11th October 2020
quotequote all
Gadgetmac said:
Kawasicki said:
Try to stick to the science, it’s clearly a bit thin in substance, but don’t give up.

Keep the posts coming, they are very illuminating.
What's REALLY illuminating is now we know what your base line is. No wonder you argue against every single SCIENCE paper published on here.

I'll continue to post them you continue to don your tin foil hat.
Once again, science please. Other threads are available.

Gadgetmac

14,984 posts

109 months

Sunday 11th October 2020
quotequote all
Kawasicki said:
Once again, science please. Other threads are available.
They are and conspiracy theorists should stick to them.

Kawasicki

13,093 posts

236 months

Sunday 11th October 2020
quotequote all
Gadgetmac said:
Kawasicki said:
Once again, science please. Other threads are available.
They are and conspiracy theorists should stick to them.
You see conspiracies everywhere.

Gadgetmac

14,984 posts

109 months

Sunday 11th October 2020
quotequote all
Kawasicki said:
You see conspiracies everywhere.
The very definition of a conspiracy theory...

Kawasicki said:
I’m also pretty sure the scientists can keep up this facade for a long, long time.
Now I'm done. As I said on page 213 (and others have also said) you're playing games. Likely aimed at provoking a ban from the moderators.

It didn't work for DM I'm not going to let it work for you.

Kawasicki

13,093 posts

236 months

Sunday 11th October 2020
quotequote all
Gadgetmac said:
Kawasicki said:
You see conspiracies everywhere.
The very definition of a conspiracy theory...

Kawasicki said:
I’m also pretty sure the scientists can keep up this facade for a long, long time.
Now I'm done. As I said on page 213 (and others have also said) you're playing games. Likely aimed at provoking a ban from the moderators.

It didn't work for DM I'm not going to let it work for you.
I’m not the one constantly moving from a scientific discussion to ad Homs. If you can’t handle scientific debate, then bye.

I’m also very curious how a ban would be justified for what I have written. I’m discussing the pathetic state of the climate science we are expected to be able to digest, not much more.


Gadgetmac

14,984 posts

109 months

Sunday 11th October 2020
quotequote all
You can't debate with someone who comes from such an extreme view point. They'll call black white and even when shown it's not they'll carry on regardless.

Like you over the "Spain sees record temps" headlines used by both the world's media and articles on scientific websites like phys.org. You'll never accept it and argue until everybody has pissed off somewhere else through boredom.

Your conspiratorial ideology won't let you believe what science is saying in papers published every single day so you'll spark an argument against every paper even though you have no background in any of the subjects or even fully understand what's being said by the scientists. Your argument about ppm was one you were having with yourself.

The ban will come from the mods seeing this as both you and I engaging in this...something another poster hoped for but it back fired. I'm not sure they would ban you but they will ban me.

Now I really am out byebye

LimSlip

800 posts

55 months

Sunday 11th October 2020
quotequote all
Gadgetmac said:
Now I really am out byebye
Congrats on diluting down any real science that may have been posted in this thread.

mko9

2,375 posts

213 months

Sunday 11th October 2020
quotequote all
LimSlip said:
Gadgetmac said:
Now I really am out byebye
Congrats on diluting down any real science that may have been posted in this thread.
The signal to noise ratio can only go up if he truly leaves. For every post he made about some scientific study, there were at least a dozen full of argument, disparagement, and ad hominem attacks

Gadgetmac

14,984 posts

109 months

Sunday 11th October 2020
quotequote all
LimSlip said:
Gadgetmac said:
Now I really am out byebye
Congrats on diluting down any real science that may have been posted in this thread.
Where's your last science input? Post up a link to it would you... nuts

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 11th October 2020
quotequote all
Kawasicki said:
"The new Cedrela chronologies from the Amazon, when compared with the hundreds of tree-ring chronologies in temperate North and South America, document this Pan American resonance of climate and ecosystem extremes in the centuries before widespread deforestation or human-caused climate change“

Can anyone see an AGW signal? Anyone?

The researchers can...
“In the past 40 years, drought and flood extremes have increased in the Amazon basin, the researchers noted, raising the question of whether human-induced climate change and deforestation are affecting Amazon climate.“

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/10/2010...

https://youtu.be/YEGJDvdwAu8

The researchers have come to a conclusion CLEARLY not supported by their own data. Why?
Say the non-fashionable thing and you don't get any more funding.

kerplunk

7,068 posts

207 months

Sunday 11th October 2020
quotequote all
Kawasicki said:
"The new Cedrela chronologies from the Amazon, when compared with the hundreds of tree-ring chronologies in temperate North and South America, document this Pan American resonance of climate and ecosystem extremes in the centuries before widespread deforestation or human-caused climate change“

Can anyone see an AGW signal? Anyone?

The researchers can...
“In the past 40 years, drought and flood extremes have increased in the Amazon basin, the researchers noted, raising the question of whether human-induced climate change and deforestation are affecting Amazon climate.“

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/10/2010...

https://youtu.be/YEGJDvdwAu8

The researchers have come to a conclusion CLEARLY not supported by their own data. Why?
Reading comprehension fail? The researcher's conclusions came AFTER the bit you've quoted:

"While that remains an open question, the longer Cedrela-based precipitation record indicates that periods of rainfall extremes occurred in the past and the current extremes might be partly due to natural climate rhythms."
.



Kawasicki

13,093 posts

236 months

Sunday 11th October 2020
quotequote all
kerplunk said:
Kawasicki said:
"The new Cedrela chronologies from the Amazon, when compared with the hundreds of tree-ring chronologies in temperate North and South America, document this Pan American resonance of climate and ecosystem extremes in the centuries before widespread deforestation or human-caused climate change“

Can anyone see an AGW signal? Anyone?

The researchers can...
“In the past 40 years, drought and flood extremes have increased in the Amazon basin, the researchers noted, raising the question of whether human-induced climate change and deforestation are affecting Amazon climate.“

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/10/2010...

https://youtu.be/YEGJDvdwAu8

The researchers have come to a conclusion CLEARLY not supported by their own data. Why?
Reading comprehension fail? The researcher's conclusions came AFTER the bit you've quoted:

"While that remains an open question, the longer Cedrela-based precipitation record indicates that periods of rainfall extremes occurred in the past and the current extremes might be partly due to natural climate rhythms."
.
What “current extremes”?

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Sunday 11th October 2020
quotequote all
Kawasicki said:
What “current extremes”?
Not absolutely sure, but I think it's moved on from feminism now....hehe