How big is space in cubic miles

How big is space in cubic miles

Author
Discussion

loudlashadjuster

5,163 posts

185 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2016
quotequote all

Hilts

4,393 posts

283 months

Thursday 4th February 2016
quotequote all
What's the smallest thing in the universe?

In centimetres.


motco

15,980 posts

247 months

Thursday 4th February 2016
quotequote all
Hilts said:
What's the smallest thing in the universe?

In centimetres.
Probably the dot over the letter 'i' .....

Monty Python

4,812 posts

198 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
Nobody knows - we can guestimate but because we don't know the shape of the universe it's impossible to say.

Russian Rocket

872 posts

237 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
Hilts said:
What's the smallest thing in the universe?

In centimetres.
depends do you want that loopy or stringy?

either way the Plank length is 10^-33 centimeters which is the smallest thing that makes sense

I think it is expected the graviton will be about this size if it exists


Hilts

4,393 posts

283 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
Russian Rocket said:
Hilts said:
What's the smallest thing in the universe?

In centimetres.
depends do you want that loopy or stringy?

either way the Plank length is 10^-33 centimeters which is the smallest thing that makes sense

I think it is expected the graviton will be about this size if it exists
Thankyou, Here's Heinz Wolff with his take...

Click

Nimby

4,624 posts

151 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
Russian Rocket said:
either way the Plank length is 10^-33 centimeters which is the smallest thing that makes sense
Well, it's smaller than the Planck length (by one letter).

skeeterm5

3,379 posts

189 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
Greg66 said:
Don't think that is quite how space works. In much the same way as one doesn't ask "is the age of the universe the period since the big bang, or do we count the time before the big bag too?"
Correct, there is no void to expand into as a void implies the universe is expanding into something.... which I pretty sure the accepted wisdom is that it isn't. If that makes any sense at all, which it doesn't!

thebraketester

14,268 posts

139 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
Surely it would be more accurate to use the distance of the furthest known object as the radius. Im not saying we are the centre of the universe, but it seems more logical than using is as diameter.