Space Launch System - Orion

Space Launch System - Orion

Author
Discussion

djdest

6,542 posts

178 months

Tuesday 17th April 2018
quotequote all
Meanwhile SpaceX just get on with it.
NASA might as well just throw in the towel

eharding

13,719 posts

284 months

Tuesday 17th April 2018
quotequote all
djdest said:
NASA might as well just throw in the towel
Too late - Musk has already nicked their towel and flew it on the Falcon Heavy, next to the "Don't Panic" sign on the Tesla roadster.

NASA need to get out of the launch business - because they don't understand business - and concentrate on what they're good at. Really, really, really clever science.


Edited by eharding on Tuesday 17th April 21:18

Beati Dogu

8,894 posts

139 months

Tuesday 17th April 2018
quotequote all
I quite agree, although they've done some pretty stty science as well. Especially NASA GISS.

MartG

20,680 posts

204 months

Beati Dogu

8,894 posts

139 months

Thursday 19th April 2018
quotequote all
NASA finally has an Administrator after 15 month hiatus: Jim Bridenstine. He's a Republican Representative from Oklahoma and a former US Navy pilot & a Major in the Oklahoma Air National Guard.

The current guy, Robert M. Lightfoot, Jr., is retiring at the end of the month after 30 years at NASA. He's been the interim Administrator since inauguration day - Jan 2017.

What impact Bridenstine has will be interesting to watch. The Senate likely won't let him axe their pet launch system even if he wants to. There's too much pork barrel involved for them.

MartG

20,680 posts

204 months

Wednesday 25th April 2018
quotequote all
Interesting news, and somewhat good for NASA - Human rating ICPS won't be as expensive as they originally thought, and EM-2 will not carry the PPE for the Lunar Gateway ( it will use a commercial launcher ). Wonder what the second payload will be then?

https://twitter.com/SpcPlcyOnline/status/989230211...

Gerstenmaier also said that from procurement to delivery, it will take 5 years to build the second Mobile Launch Platform - so that's a minimum of 5 years before a Block 1B flys frown Also that human rating requirements today would not allow us to fly the Lunar Excursion Module used with Apollo so will be NASA in-house effort, primarily, to define requirements for new human lunar lander in early 20s.


Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,033 posts

265 months

Wednesday 25th April 2018
quotequote all
The Apollo Lunar Module was probably the most marginal manned spacecraft ever built. I'm not at all surprised that it would not be countenanced in the current era.

MartG

20,680 posts

204 months

Thursday 26th April 2018
quotequote all
Recently inside the Space Station Processing Facility (SSPF) high bay at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida, workers assisted as a crane moved the Orion Stage Adapter (OSA) to a work area. The OSA is the second flight-hardware section of the agency's NASA's Space Launch System rocket to arrive at Kennedy. The OSA will connect the NASA’s Orion Spacecraft to the upper part of the SLS, the interim cryogenic propulsion stage (ICPS). Both the OSA and ICPS are being stored for processing in the center's SSPF in preparation for Exploration Mission-1, the first uncrewed, integrated launch of the SLS rocket and Orion spacecraft. Photo credit: NASA/Glenn Benson #WisdomWednesday




MartG

20,680 posts

204 months

Saturday 28th April 2018
quotequote all
RFI issued for lunar lander proposals...

https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2018/03/nasa-court...

...just as NASA cancel their robotic moon rover

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-sc...

MartG

20,680 posts

204 months

Sunday 29th April 2018
quotequote all
Interesting document - mission planning guide for SLS

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa....

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,033 posts

265 months

Sunday 29th April 2018
quotequote all
I wonder if SpaceX feels the need to release a 106 page document setting out what they plan to do in that kind of detail?

djdest

6,542 posts

178 months

Sunday 29th April 2018
quotequote all
They’re too busy doing it

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,033 posts

265 months

Sunday 29th April 2018
quotequote all
djdest said:
They’re too busy doing it
Probably.

Being state funded, I expect NASA is obliged under Federal Law to issue such documentation. They probably have no choice.

Kccv23highliftcam

1,783 posts

75 months

Sunday 29th April 2018
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
djdest said:
They’re too busy doing it
Probably.

Being state funded, I expect NASA is obliged under Federal Law to issue such documentation. They probably have no choice.
Slighly OT here..

.. my partner complieted a "Back to Nursing" course at Dunndee university Hospital a few years ago.

18 months day release, all it was was lectures and report writing....bureaucracy over action!

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,033 posts

265 months

Sunday 29th April 2018
quotequote all
The penalty for having to be accountable to the taxpayer.

Beati Dogu

8,894 posts

139 months

Sunday 29th April 2018
quotequote all
The penalty of being a bureaucracy and a lack of decent management.

MartG

20,680 posts

204 months

Sunday 29th April 2018
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
The penalty of being a bureaucracy and a lack of decent management.
And of having lots of people on the payroll who need to appear busy to justify their jobs

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,033 posts

265 months

Sunday 29th April 2018
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
The penalty of being a bureaucracy and a lack of decent management.
I think my explanation will be the correct one.

Kccv23highliftcam

1,783 posts

75 months

Sunday 29th April 2018
quotequote all
I think you misinterpreted my posting.

It was ALL admin and NOTHING on the wards.


Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,033 posts

265 months

Sunday 29th April 2018
quotequote all
My issue with Orion and SLS is not so much what they are doing - but the SPEED at which they are doing it.