Space Launch System - Orion

Space Launch System - Orion

Author
Discussion

Beati Dogu

8,892 posts

139 months

Thursday 8th April 2021
quotequote all
They've no doubt seen all the SpaceX hype and thought they'll try to tap into some of that public interest. Fair enough really, but it does look a tad lame.

NASA & SpaceX do remind me of the PC vs Mac adverts back in the day:


Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Thursday 8th April 2021
quotequote all
NASA has always made promotional; films of what it does. There is plenty of footage of the Apollo capsule doing that exact same test (including on one occasion when it actually sank).

Beati Dogu

8,892 posts

139 months

Friday 16th April 2021
quotequote all
Tonight at 9 pm UK time, they'll announce which of the 3 contenders has been selected to develop the Moon lander for the Artemis project.


"Today at 4pm ET, we will reveal which company or companies NASA has selected to continue developing the first commercial Human Landing System — the spacecraft that will carry astronauts to the surface of the Moon during #Artemis missions."

https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-to-announc...


Spoiler alert...

Word is that SpaceX have won - Huge if true




MartG

20,678 posts

204 months

Friday 16th April 2021
quotequote all
"Official: SpaceX's Starship is the only vehicle selected to move forward as the Human Landing System for NASA's Artemis program, beating out Blue Origin and Dynetics." - Michael Baylor @nextspaceflight

Ian974

2,941 posts

199 months

Friday 16th April 2021
quotequote all
Surprising to me, mainly in that they're going with such a big step change in concept.
The blue origin/ national team I wouldn't have been overly surprised at as it looks a bit more of a traditional approach.
I wonder if the general delays with starliner and SLS have affected what would have been the "safe" choice.
Spacex do seem determined to have starship operational regardless of whether anyone else actually needs it, which I guess probably works in their favour as well

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Friday 16th April 2021
quotequote all
Also on the Space X thread.

Maybe the two threads need to be merged as the two projects are gradually melding.

Beati Dogu

8,892 posts

139 months

Saturday 17th April 2021
quotequote all
Some journalist on the NASA press conference asked if Starship would launch on top of SLS.

I kid you not.

When SpaceX wheels out their booster prototype to the pad, it's going to surprise a lot of people.


rxe

6,700 posts

103 months

Wednesday 21st April 2021
quotequote all
The question of “what the hell is the point of SLS” becomes even more sharp with their lander choice made.

Which bits of this programme is it actually going to launch? If you get down to it - why isn’t the Lunar Gateway just another Starship with a docking port nailed onto it? Rather than some diddy space station, you have an already designed craft that is scaled to take a lot of people to Mars - it would more than do as an orbiting Moon station.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Wednesday 21st April 2021
quotequote all
What we are seeing is a convergence of two radically different projects. Having said that, I am still not convinced that Starship will ultimately be the actual Lunar Lander. I think the unexpected announcement last week was as much a political shot across the bows by NASA to elicit more funding from Congress than a genuine declaration of intent.

What I am sure of is that the next manned lunar landing will be closer to 2034 rather than 2024 - and it may not be American.

Beati Dogu

8,892 posts

139 months

Wednesday 21st April 2021
quotequote all
The renders of Starship docked to the Lunar Gateway do look a bit ridiculous. It dwarfs the Gateway.

As for the proposed landers:



The National Team should have had Lockheed Martin or Northrop Grumman as lead, not Blue Origin, who have barely any track record with NASA.

Beati Dogu

8,892 posts

139 months

Friday 23rd April 2021
quotequote all
The SLS booster has been taken down from the test stand and is on a ship headed to Florida now.

It’ll probably arrive at the Kennedy Space Center on Thursday.

Flooble

5,565 posts

100 months

Saturday 24th April 2021
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
The SLS booster has been taken down from the test stand and is on a ship headed to Florida now.

It’ll probably arrive at the Kennedy Space Center on Thursday.
With SpaceX building their orbital launch pad now, this is actually now starting to feel a bit like a race.

How quickly can the SLS team get their rocket assembled and out to the launchpad versus how fast can SpaceX knock out a fully working booster, pad and Starship.

Who's going to be first too orbit? You would have said SLS, then in 2020 it started to look like it might be SpaceX, now it feels like the advantage may be back with SLS.

It's at least as good as a Grand Prix!

annodomini2

6,861 posts

251 months

Saturday 24th April 2021
quotequote all
Flooble said:
Beati Dogu said:
The SLS booster has been taken down from the test stand and is on a ship headed to Florida now.

It’ll probably arrive at the Kennedy Space Center on Thursday.
With SpaceX building their orbital launch pad now, this is actually now starting to feel a bit like a race.

How quickly can the SLS team get their rocket assembled and out to the launchpad versus how fast can SpaceX knock out a fully working booster, pad and Starship.

Who's going to be first too orbit? You would have said SLS, then in 2020 it started to look like it might be SpaceX, now it feels like the advantage may be back with SLS.

It's at least as good as a Grand Prix!
Definitely SpaceX, the delays on the Orion capsule will probably put the launch back to 2022

Beati Dogu

8,892 posts

139 months

Saturday 24th April 2021
quotequote all
You are probably right. NASA takes two hours to come through an open hatch.

Beati Dogu

8,892 posts

139 months

Friday 30th April 2021
quotequote all
The SLS booster was wheeled into the VAB at Cape Canaveral yesterday. Ready to be hoisted upright and integrated to the boosters.



Yep, it's big.

Flooble

5,565 posts

100 months

Monday 17th May 2021
quotequote all
Can someone confirm something for me, as I think I've misread the numbers.

If I remember correctly the Shuttle could put 110 tonnes into orbit (Orbiter + Payload). That was with three RS-25s and four-segment recoverable SRBs.

The SLS Block 1 will apparently put 95 tonnes into orbit - if you count the ICPS second stage as part of the 95 tonnes. That's with four RS-25s in expendable mode and 5.5 segment SRBs with no recovery hardware.

Something seems wrong - less payload despite having an extra engine (which can be pushed harder as they are expended), significantly bigger SRBs and no need to carry recovery hardware on those SRBs.

I suspect I have read the wrong figure somewhere, or there is something not quite exact in the comparison. Any ideas?

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Monday 17th May 2021
quotequote all
Did any Shuttles EVER put 110 tonnes into low earth orbit?

MartG

20,678 posts

204 months

Monday 17th May 2021
quotequote all
The heaviest space shuttle orbiter, Columbia, weighed 80,700 kg empty

Add the stated LEO payload of 27,500 kg, plus consumables, and you're damn close to 110 tonnes

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Monday 17th May 2021
quotequote all
The Shuttle carried a lot of ballast into space. For it’s overall mass lifting capability, the actual payload was not great.

In theory, SLS will carry more useful mass into space.

And it’s optimised for deep space work rather than low earth orbit, so that might explain the difference.


Talksteer

4,866 posts

233 months

Monday 17th May 2021
quotequote all
Re SLS numbers to LEO.

The SLS can put around 70 tonnes into LEO without the upper stage with the core stage making orbit

The core stage weighs about 95 tonnes empty hence it can inject 165 tonnes into orbit.

Put a slightly heavier load on it and it stages just before orbit to maximize the payload over the injected mass.

The SLS is optimised (for pork barrel politics) for higher energy orbits than LEO and is also really optimised to use the exploration upper stage.