Space Launch System - Orion
Discussion
Okay, for clarity, what I was driving at is that the new NASA Administrator, Nelson, is the same guy who "designed" SLS via the laws he wrote from the Capital building.
https://www.science.org/content/article/former-sen...
Hence my comment; it's hardly surprising that he wants to keep his pet project alive.
Knowledge or lack of isn't the issue, simply that he is the father of SLS so is about as impartial as NASA appointing Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk or Tory Bruno as the NASA administrator.
https://www.science.org/content/article/former-sen...
Hence my comment; it's hardly surprising that he wants to keep his pet project alive.
Knowledge or lack of isn't the issue, simply that he is the father of SLS so is about as impartial as NASA appointing Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk or Tory Bruno as the NASA administrator.
There's degrees of support though. Bridenstine supported SLS to the extent he had to, but you can bet (as far as any of us can tell from where we are sitting) that he would have been ensuring those ordering him around were aware of the effect on his budget and made them use up political capital to obtain his support ("I'll say nice things about SLS, provided I'm allowed to have commercial crew").
I would note that there was a little flurry of decisions before Nelson sat down in the chair - Europa Clipper went to Falcon Heavy and the Lunar lander went to SpaceX.
Clearly the reach of the Senators is not complete.
Had Nelson been at the helm, I cannot help but suspect we would have seen Europa Clipper being reworked to cope with SLS vibrations (and wait patiently for a slot) while the lunar lander would have gone to "National team".
Just suppose the Senate decided that SLS was a total waste of time and money and decided to do another review similar to the Augustine Committee. Would Nelson roll over and say "okay then" or would he fight to keep it?
Being under the thumb of those above you doesn't prevent you having your own opinions, which will feed into decision making above and below.
I would note that there was a little flurry of decisions before Nelson sat down in the chair - Europa Clipper went to Falcon Heavy and the Lunar lander went to SpaceX.
Clearly the reach of the Senators is not complete.
Had Nelson been at the helm, I cannot help but suspect we would have seen Europa Clipper being reworked to cope with SLS vibrations (and wait patiently for a slot) while the lunar lander would have gone to "National team".
Just suppose the Senate decided that SLS was a total waste of time and money and decided to do another review similar to the Augustine Committee. Would Nelson roll over and say "okay then" or would he fight to keep it?
Being under the thumb of those above you doesn't prevent you having your own opinions, which will feed into decision making above and below.
360 degree camera of the Orion nose section bring mated to the SLS rocket:
https://youtu.be/JcGP7F_es-E
Click and drag to move the view around.
https://youtu.be/JcGP7F_es-E
Click and drag to move the view around.
First launch slips again to no earlier than March
https://www.space.com/artemis-1-launch-march-april...
https://www.space.com/artemis-1-launch-march-april...
They plan to roll SLS out to the pad in mid-February for testing with the ground support equipment. Actual launch won't be until March / April time.
https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/news/artemis/
https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/news/artemis/
Gassing Station | Science! | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff