Spaceplanes - Cases for and Against

Spaceplanes - Cases for and Against

Author
Discussion

MartG

20,679 posts

204 months

Thursday 15th June 2017
quotequote all
Using the X-37 as a reuseable spysat would also make economic sense - with a KH-11 satellite coming in at around $4.4 billion, having a system which can be launched when needed to cover a particular area of interest then returned for refurbishment as needed will save a fair bit of money. $90million for a SpaceX launch is small by comparison.

Edited by MartG on Thursday 15th June 16:35

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Thursday 15th June 2017
quotequote all
Can't see how the XS-1 as it currently is configured could recover any satellites already in orbit. The winged booster would not be capable of orbital velocity, so it cannot catch up, rendezvous and dock with an orbiting satellite

When placing a satellite INTO orbit, the satellite obtains its orbital velocity from the upper stage rocket attached to the satellite.

The winged booster also has no capacity for a payload bay. It's essentially a set of fuel tanks with wings and an undercarriage.

MartG

20,679 posts

204 months

Thursday 15th June 2017
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Can't see how the XS-1 as it currently is configured could recover any satellites already in orbit.
I guess it would need the payload to be a recoverable capsule, or maybe an X-37 type vehicle

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Thursday 15th June 2017
quotequote all
MartG said:
Eric Mc said:
Can't see how the XS-1 as it currently is configured could recover any satellites already in orbit.
I guess it would need the payload to be a recoverable capsule, or maybe an X-37 type vehicle
That would be good - and a final realisation of the very first fully recoverable Space Shuttle concepts -






MartG

20,679 posts

204 months

Wednesday 5th July 2017
quotequote all
Seems another spaceplane project has bitten the dust - XCOR has laid off the rest of its employees frown

http://www.parabolicarc.com/2017/07/05/xcor-lays-r...

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Wednesday 5th July 2017
quotequote all
Sad in a way but they always seemed the most likely to struggle. Weren't they the guys who were building the Lynx - and which Lynx deoderant were running a "Space Cadet" promotion?

That's obviously dead in the water now - if it wasn't already.

MartG

20,679 posts

204 months

Wednesday 5th July 2017
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Sad in a way but they always seemed the most likely to struggle. Weren't they the guys who were building the Lynx - and which Lynx deoderant were running a "Space Cadet" promotion?

That's obviously dead in the water now - if it wasn't already.
Yes - they'd pretty much stopped work on the Lynx when they laid off half the staff in May 2016, with the survivors working on an engine for ULA's new Vulcan upper stage