NASA’s Perseverance Mars rover

NASA’s Perseverance Mars rover

Author
Discussion

Eric Mc

122,071 posts

266 months

Thursday 18th February 2021
quotequote all
Pupp said:
Meanwhile, on Horsell Common, the large threaded plug on a still-smoking metallic looking cylinder that is half embedded in the sod starts to unscrew...
s again. I wish they'd clean up their rubbish.

Beati Dogu

Original Poster:

8,897 posts

140 months

Friday 19th February 2021
quotequote all
This is where it landed:



The blue circle was the target area. Impressive.

This landing ellipse is only 4.8 miles long and 4.1 miles wide. Almost a circle, the accuracy is so good.

By comparison, the landing ellipse for the Viking missions was 174 miles long and 72 miles wide.



Armchair_Expert

18,356 posts

207 months

Friday 19th February 2021
quotequote all
When will the descent video be released and what sort of quality can we expect? Blurred computer pixels reminiscent of Huygens or a Netflix 2 screen account HD feature?

RacerMike

4,211 posts

212 months

Friday 19th February 2021
quotequote all
Armchair_Expert said:
When will the descent video be released and what sort of quality can we expect? Blurred computer pixels reminiscent of Huygens or a Netflix 2 screen account HD feature?
From what I read/heard, it’s allegedly full HD

ChocolateFrog

25,510 posts

174 months

Friday 19th February 2021
quotequote all
Incredible achievement.

So many things could do wrong.

Must have looked incredible if you could have stood on Mars look up watching this things descend on rockets and cranes.

Edited by ChocolateFrog on Friday 19th February 07:26

Eric Mc

122,071 posts

266 months

Friday 19th February 2021
quotequote all
Don't forget that they did this before - nine years ago. Perseverance is basically a modified version of Curiosity. It uses the same basic chassis and vehicle although the suite of scientific experiments carried on board is different.

So NASA has had practice with this type of descent and landing.

Corrected to get the lander name right.

Edited by Eric Mc on Friday 19th February 08:50

MiniMan64

16,945 posts

191 months

Friday 19th February 2021
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Don't forget that they did this before - nine years ago. Perseverance is basically a modified version of Opportunity. It uses the same basic chassis and vehicle although the suite of scientific experiments carried on board is different.

So NASA has had practice with this type of descent and landing.
Umm feels odd correcting you Eric but don’t you mean Curiosity?

Spirit and Opportunity were the little dinky solar powered ones from about 15 years ago?

The Hofff

206 posts

172 months

Friday 19th February 2021
quotequote all
I know its a completely different field but I work in the oilfield industry - we can spend multiple millions of dollars and several years designing/developing specialist equipment to essentially just drill and steer through the earth beneath us. Temperature, pressure, shock and vibration are extreme variables but we designs to tools to cope accordingly... however, things still go wrong.

Fortunately, we can just pull it back out of the hole and fix it or replace with another one, not quite the same when your equipment is on another plant

The achievement of sending a tonne of equipment to another plant and landing it safely is nothing short of amazing. Hats off to all that have worked on this, and all past projects.



Edited by The Hofff on Friday 19th February 08:24

Big Nanas

1,371 posts

85 months

Friday 19th February 2021
quotequote all
London424 said:
CraigyMc said:
MiniMan64 said:
London424 said:
That reaction when they found out where it landed seemed like they may have been off a bit.
Didn’t they say that it had the ability to pick its own landing site and adjust accordingly?
Yep. It has (well, had) the ability to select a landing zone itself. NASA call it terrain relative navigation (TRN).
Basically it'll avoid rough ground, cliffs, stuff like that.
It was just when they said it’s telling us where it is there was some strange comments and I swear I heard a “we’ll take it” or words to that effect. Maybe it’s not quite where they anticipated
I remember hearing 'Lander has successfully calculated a landing solution' (or words to that effect).

Eric Mc

122,071 posts

266 months

Friday 19th February 2021
quotequote all
MiniMan64 said:
Umm feels odd correcting you Eric but don’t you mean Curiosity?

Spirit and Opportunity were the little dinky solar powered ones from about 15 years ago?
Yes, I did. In my head I was typing Curiosity. Brains are strange things. I'll correct the original message.

There was also the even dinkier Sojourner, which was carried by the Pathfinder lander in 1997.

FunkyNige

8,892 posts

276 months

Friday 19th February 2021
quotequote all
generationx said:
So what really happens to the Sky Crane Eric?
I know this has been answered, but here's a video of the how the landing works. The sky crane bit is at about 3 minutes in


I'm in awe they managed to pull it off flawlessly twice.

Oilchange

8,468 posts

261 months

Friday 19th February 2021
quotequote all
Pupp said:
Meanwhile, on Horsell Common, the large threaded plug on a still-smoking metallic looking cylinder that is half embedded in the sod starts to unscrew...
Then an onlooker sneezes in it’s general direction...

MartG

20,695 posts

205 months

Friday 19th February 2021
quotequote all
Oilchange said:
Pupp said:
Meanwhile, on Horsell Common, the large threaded plug on a still-smoking metallic looking cylinder that is half embedded in the sod starts to unscrew...
Then an onlooker sneezes in it’s general direction...
yes

Ash_

5,929 posts

191 months

Friday 19th February 2021
quotequote all

rider73

3,055 posts

78 months

Friday 19th February 2021
quotequote all
colin79666 said:
console.write(“Hello World”);

biggrin
10 PRINT "Hello Mars"
20 GOTO 10
RUN


ianrb

1,536 posts

141 months

Friday 19th February 2021
quotequote all
FunkyNige said:
generationx said:
So what really happens to the Sky Crane Eric?
I know this has been answered, but here's a video of the how the landing works. The sky crane bit is at about 3 minutes in


I'm in awe they managed to pull it off flawlessly twice.
Some of those engineers look a bit young!

I must be getting old.


CraigyMc

16,423 posts

237 months

Friday 19th February 2021
quotequote all
MiseryStreak said:
I so want to be there.

No viruses.

No people.

No oxygen.

Heaven.
Hey, at least your corpse won't rot. It'll bleach. smile
(limited UV protection + "soil" made of perchlorate...)


MXRod

2,753 posts

148 months

Friday 19th February 2021
quotequote all
I was amazed at the size of the rover

3m long
2.7m wide
2.2 m high
1,025 kg
The size of family car

MiniMan64

16,945 posts

191 months

Friday 19th February 2021
quotequote all
MXRod said:
I was amazed at the size of the rover

3m long
2.7m wide
2.2 m high
1,025 kg
The size of family car
Yeah it’s fairly loaded, UAV on board, power source, all the instruments, it’s a bit of a step up from the earlier tinny rovers that were basically cameras and solar panels on wheels. I always quite liked the Curiosity was called the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL).

Seemed appropriate

Russ35

2,492 posts

240 months

Friday 19th February 2021
quotequote all
Press conference @ 6pm and more photos to be shown apparently.