SpaceX (Vol. 2)

Author
Discussion

MartG

20,691 posts

205 months

Friday 1st April 2022
quotequote all
Transporter 4 mission due off at 17:24 tonight https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NqSoHnkKEM

Beati Dogu

8,896 posts

140 months

Friday 1st April 2022
quotequote all
garyhun said:
RizzoTheRat said:
Beati Dogu said:
I expect they'll pressure test the booster, then it'll get the grid fins added later. The plan is to catch the booster in mid air with the tower, so it doesn't have legs.
Is that the plan right from the start. I'd have thought they'd want to at least prove a few precision landings before trying with the tower.
It’s the SpaceX way - just do it, learn, do it again and keep repeating until it’s perfected.

After saying that, they have pretty much perfected the Falcon 9 booster landings so assume that, justifiably so, confidence is high.
Yes, I'm sure if it was just up to SpaceX they'd try a tower recover at the first attempt. The FAA will likely want them to do a controlled landing in the sea first.

It's what SpaceX did with Falcon 9 before they started putting drone ships underneath them.

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 1st April 2022
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
garyhun said:
RizzoTheRat said:
Beati Dogu said:
I expect they'll pressure test the booster, then it'll get the grid fins added later. The plan is to catch the booster in mid air with the tower, so it doesn't have legs.
Is that the plan right from the start. I'd have thought they'd want to at least prove a few precision landings before trying with the tower.
It’s the SpaceX way - just do it, learn, do it again and keep repeating until it’s perfected.

After saying that, they have pretty much perfected the Falcon 9 booster landings so assume that, justifiably so, confidence is high.
Yes, I'm sure if it was just up to SpaceX they'd try a tower recover at the first attempt. The FAA will likely want them to do a controlled landing in the sea first.

It's what SpaceX did with Falcon 9 before they started putting drone ships underneath them.
I’m sure you are right.

annodomini2

6,865 posts

252 months

Sunday 3rd April 2022
quotequote all
B7 on the Orbital launch mount

Beati Dogu

8,896 posts

140 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
The Axiom Mission 1 private Dragon/Falcon 9 flight is due off soon. It’ll take 4 people for an 8 day stay on the ISS.



Seen here at pad 39a, with the SLS at neighbouring pad 39b.

Launch is expected to be on Friday 8th April at 4.17 pm UK time.

Matt Harper

6,621 posts

202 months

Friday 8th April 2022
quotequote all
Falcon 9 rocket plume, from my back yard this morning...


HughG

3,549 posts

242 months

Friday 8th April 2022
quotequote all
Good footage of the booster landing today thumbup

Beati Dogu

8,896 posts

140 months

Friday 8th April 2022
quotequote all
"Smooth video courtesy of bolting Starlinks to the deck. They are able to handle high vibration & acoustics." - Elon


They've got another launch to the ISS in a couple of weeks - the Crew 4 mission on 20th April.

MartG

20,691 posts

205 months

Friday 8th April 2022
quotequote all
Video render of Starship Mars landing - love the beat-up rover !

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piVwHO4esPg

Caruso

7,439 posts

257 months

Friday 8th April 2022
quotequote all
MartG said:
Video render of Starship Mars landing - love the beat-up rover !

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piVwHO4esPg
Aah...the famous blue skies of Mars. wink

Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Saturday 9th April 2022
quotequote all
Mars CAN have blue skies. Ironically, sometimes at sunset or at sunrise the Martian sky can have a blueish/greenish tinge.

Beati Dogu

8,896 posts

140 months

Saturday 9th April 2022
quotequote all
Matt Harper said:
Falcon 9 rocket plume, from my back yard this morning...
Nice. Pretty cool to be so close to all this activity.

Matt Harper

6,621 posts

202 months

Sunday 10th April 2022
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
Matt Harper said:
Falcon 9 rocket plume, from my back yard this morning...
Nice. Pretty cool to be so close to all this activity.
I live about 45 miles due west of KSC and I'm almost ashamed to say that these launches have become so routine that unless I'm out doing yard-work, or it makes the news because it's unusual (as is this one), we don't pay a huge amount of attention to them.

The Shuttle program was an entirely different scenario. Those launches (and returns) were so spectacular in comparison. I was lucky enough to have a neighbor who worked for Lockheed Martin, who collaborate with NASA quite extensively. He invited me to go with him to the launch of Endeavor for STS134 in 2001 at Kennedy. It was mind-meltingly cool.

I can only imagine how incredible those Saturn 5 launches must have been.

Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Monday 11th April 2022
quotequote all
STS-134 was in 2011 (it was the second to last Shuttle mission).

Smiljan

10,869 posts

198 months

Monday 11th April 2022
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
STS-134 was in 2011 (it was the second to last Shuttle mission).
I’m sure Matt will Endeavour to get the year correct next time Eric.

Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Monday 11th April 2022
quotequote all
Smiljan said:
Eric Mc said:
STS-134 was in 2011 (it was the second to last Shuttle mission).
I’m sure Matt will Endeavour to get the year correct next time Eric.
It may be a Challenge(r) but I'm sure he will make a Discovery and get it right smile

knitware

1,473 posts

194 months

Monday 11th April 2022
quotequote all
Anyone watched 'Return to Space' Netflix. I really enjoyed this documentary film logging the efforts of Elon and his SpaceX team, the man is quite remarkable.

Matt Harper

6,621 posts

202 months

Monday 11th April 2022
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Smiljan said:
Eric Mc said:
STS-134 was in 2011 (it was the second to last Shuttle mission).
I’m sure Matt will Endeavour to get the year correct next time Eric.
It may be a Challenge(r) but I'm sure he will make a Discovery and get it right smile
I sincerely beg everyone's pardon - a slip of the finger I was still living in the UK in May 2001.


Edited by Matt Harper on Monday 11th April 18:14

Talksteer

4,885 posts

234 months

Tuesday 12th April 2022
quotequote all
annodomini2 said:
RizzoTheRat said:
loudlashadjuster said:
Too massive, maybe. A small misalignment, an unintended torque. Bang.

Having said that, it’s not hugely heavier than the SSO.

Also, where would you put the hatch and docking mechanism?
They've done a few mockup/renders of Starship docked to the ISS, some with a node mounted hatch, presumably similar to Dragon, and some with it on the side more like the shuttle. Maximum landing weight is of the shuttle is about 100 tonnes, which I think Isn't that dissimilar to Starship, that's potentially a lot of load on the docking port if anything goes wrong. How flexible are they?
Current prototypes are about 120-130 tonnes dry, without payload.

On orbit Starship for going to ISS will have all the habitation gear for a manned flight + any other payload 50-150 tonnes

Plus de-orbit and landing fuel 50-100 tonnes
We can do a few calcs:

Max inert weight of the Starship could be 130 tones dry plus 150 tonnes payload. Though I'm sure that the 150 is probably achieved when the vessel is less than 130 tonnes dry!

We can put a ceiling on the landing fuel as it is 2 raptors for 17 seconds which is about 20 tonnes of fuel, in practice this is probably an accurate amount including margins as the Raptors will be throttled for most of that time.

Assuming that the Starship has the same delta v under OMS as the Shuttle (300ms-1) that would mean that it need 8% of its mass as fuel. This brings us to a max on orbit mass of 320 tonnes.

However we could do an estimate for a more reasonable version of Starship to visit the ISS. The ISS can't accommodate hundreds to people and I doubt we are ready to risk people on rockets by the hundred either. So lets have a max crew of 20.

Current capsules mass in the range of 5-10 tonnes with all systems.

If we allow 10kg/m2 to insulate and seal the craft that adds 5000kg
If we allow 15kg per person for life support systems (see space suit) and we have a crew of 20 - 300kg
A large civil aircraft normally has about 20kg per passenger of fitting and fixtures (HVAC etc) - 400kg
1kg per person day of consumables - 200kg
Provision 250kg per person for an ejector seat (I don't like the landing), space suits, displays, life support connections- 5000kg
A caravans worth of beds, tables, decks and stters -2000kg
Solar panels, power conversion equipment and decent battery -1000kg
Crew 20 x 100kg - 2000kg

Total 15,900kg

Which is a long winded way of saying I don't think any reasonable timeframe crew vessel is going to be using a fraction of the payload volume.

If we round up the delivery to 20 tonnes to include cargo provisions for ISS that gets us to:

120,000 inert mass
20,000 cargo and crew fittings
20,000 landing fuel
13,000 OMS fuel (partially burnt by the time you get there)

173 tonnes, so not massively different to the STS


Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Tuesday 12th April 2022
quotequote all
Matt Harper said:
Eric Mc said:
Smiljan said:
Eric Mc said:
STS-134 was in 2011 (it was the second to last Shuttle mission).
I’m sure Matt will Endeavour to get the year correct next time Eric.
It may be a Challenge(r) but I'm sure he will make a Discovery and get it right smile
I sincerely beg everyone's pardon - a slip of the finger I was still living in the UK in May 2001.


Edited by Matt Harper on Monday 11th April 18:14
You're forgiven - especially as you are now on the other side of the Atlantis(c).

We're only jealous.