Space Station Spotting
Discussion
Gandahar said:
I'm new to this thread but can someone advise on the following so I can do ISS spotting?
1. What anorak should I get?
2. Tupperware boxes for my sandwiches, big or little?
3. Do I have to live with my mother still?
4. If it's daylight and it passes through the sun can I use binoculars as long as I am also wearing solar eclipse glasses ? Can I just sellotape the solar glasses over the end of the binoculars, or do they have to go between the eye pieces and my eyes?
Also, I have got a notebook and pen. What serial number is the ISS so I can jot it down when the time comes ?
Thanks in advance.
Bert from Euston.
It's not worth going to the trouble of making sandwiches when the maximum time a pass takes is about five minutes.1. What anorak should I get?
2. Tupperware boxes for my sandwiches, big or little?
3. Do I have to live with my mother still?
4. If it's daylight and it passes through the sun can I use binoculars as long as I am also wearing solar eclipse glasses ? Can I just sellotape the solar glasses over the end of the binoculars, or do they have to go between the eye pieces and my eyes?
Also, I have got a notebook and pen. What serial number is the ISS so I can jot it down when the time comes ?
Thanks in advance.
Bert from Euston.
A quick munch on a choccie bar will suffice.
As far as I know, the ISS doesn't have a serial number of any sort.
MiseryStreak said:
Get a great view of the ISS at the moment from the hot tub as my garden runs east-west. Must remember to look out for the Dragon launch.
I can understand why astronomers are so pissed off about the Starlink satellites, they’re pretty much non-stop!
Why can’t they just paint them matt black and angle the PV arrays slightly away from the Earth?
Apparently one of the Starlink 2 satellites has an ‘experimental coating to reflect less light‘. Hmmmm...did matt black Hammerite not make the initial round?
Covered in detail in another thread somewhere. Painting a satellite black is too simplistic a solution. Satellites need to have different coatings to control internal temperatures. Painting a satellite black would make it fail shortly after entering orbit.I can understand why astronomers are so pissed off about the Starlink satellites, they’re pretty much non-stop!
Why can’t they just paint them matt black and angle the PV arrays slightly away from the Earth?
Apparently one of the Starlink 2 satellites has an ‘experimental coating to reflect less light‘. Hmmmm...did matt black Hammerite not make the initial round?
IAmTheWalrus said:
May I ask is the shuttle actually visible to see its shape or is it just a sparkle in the sky?
I presume you are using better equipment than binoculars?
The Shuttle is completely invisible these days because it is no longer in use. It was retired in 2011 I presume you are using better equipment than binoculars?
When it was in use, it was definitely visible. To the naked eye and even with binoculars, it looked like a dot. However, with the right type of optics (essentially, a telescope on a tracking mount) the outline of the Orbiter was clearly visible.
Gassing Station | Science! | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff