High Compression

Author
Discussion

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

256 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2013
quotequote all
bearman68 said:
Not directly, though the engine temperature gauge is reading OK, and this must be taken from the EC sensor.
Why must it? Plenty of cars either have two separate sensors, or four wire sensors that include two thermistors in the same housing.

Mikey G

4,735 posts

241 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2013
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
bearman68 said:
Not directly, though the engine temperature gauge is reading OK, and this must be taken from the EC sensor.
Why must it? Plenty of cars either have two separate sensors, or four wire sensors that include two thermistors in the same housing.
Yep, I would guess that this car has a basic system so will run 2 separate sensors.

bearman68

Original Poster:

4,666 posts

133 months

Sunday 3rd November 2013
quotequote all
Just to feedback to all the nice people who have made comment.

Poor engine running turned out to be dirty fuel - in this case contaminated with diesel.

System drained, and filled with fresh fuel, and all is well.

Cheers all.

PaulKemp

979 posts

146 months

Monday 4th November 2013
quotequote all
How did Desiel get in the fuel?
Petrol station problem or driver error?

bearman68

Original Poster:

4,666 posts

133 months

Monday 4th November 2013
quotequote all
I'd like to come up with a long fangled explanation that says it's not my fault, but......

I drained a 206 diesel that had been filled with petrol, and put it in a marked can...... and then used it to fill the ford.

Funnily enough, just today after it's been running fine, it started to misfire, and lo and behold one of the new plugs I fitted last week has gone belly up. Fitted the old one, and all good again.

I can't believe I was so stupid to fill the damn thing with contaminated fuel. weeping

PaulKemp

979 posts

146 months

Tuesday 26th November 2013
quotequote all

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

256 months

Tuesday 26th November 2013
quotequote all
I notice that the table and the equations have now been changed in Wikipedia, with no information on how the new table values are derived.

Auntieroll

543 posts

185 months

Tuesday 26th November 2013
quotequote all
The compression ratio of a PISTON engine is calculated thus:- The swept volume of the cylinder +the combustion chamber volume divided by the combustion chamber volume. V+v/v.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

256 months

Tuesday 26th November 2013
quotequote all
Auntieroll said:
The compression ratio of a PISTON engine is calculated thus:- The swept volume of the cylinder +the combustion chamber volume divided by the combustion chamber volume. V+v/v.
The definition of static compression ratio is not in doubt. The thread is about the relationship between static compression ratio and the measured pressure ratio when cranking.

Auntieroll

543 posts

185 months

Wednesday 27th November 2013
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
The definition of static compression ratio is not in doubt. The thread is about the relationship between static compression ratio and the measured pressure ratio when cranking.
I agree, but the way that the static compression ratio is calculated has ,so far not been mentioned in the thread.
The Wikipaedia chart pasted in one of the above postings is for gas turbine engines, indeed a quick glance at the paragraph above the pasted equations from the Wiki entry specifically states this very fact.

I would think that any truly accurate correlation between the static C/R and the measured pressure when cranking is rather unlikely, the number of variables to be measured i.e. temps, atmospheric pressure, gas density etc; these equations are for "ideal gases" and laboratory conditions are required to make precise measurement possible.

A quick compression test, followed by a cylinder leakdown test should give a good idea of the condition of the top end though, however, the idea that a simple compression tester (calibrated accurately?)can determine the C/R of an engine is frankly laughable.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

256 months

Wednesday 27th November 2013
quotequote all
Auntieroll said:
I would think that any truly accurate correlation between the static C/R and the measured pressure when cranking is rather unlikely,
Agreed, as already been mentioned by a couple of other people. However, if you read Dave Walkers section in PPC he's had a few cars in to map that suffered from bad detonation with any reasonable amount of ignition advance and he used a compression tester to discover the engine builder had set the CR way too high (pegged the gauge on his tester).

PaulKemp

979 posts

146 months

Saturday 30th November 2013
quotequote all
Another spanner in the works is that the cam duration and overlap will effect the compression reading and further confuse any pressure to static compression relationship

Mikey G

4,735 posts

241 months

Saturday 30th November 2013
quotequote all
RealSquirrels said:
Boyles law states that the product of pressure and volume is constant in a sealed system when you change the volume, the pressure increases or decreases accordingly.

i.e. p1 x v1 = p2 x v2

Thus if you have a vessel with an internal pressure of 1 bar (roughly atmospheric) and decrease its volume by a factor of 14, the resulting pressure is 14 bar.

e.g. 1 bar x 14 cc = 14 bar x 1 cc

Obviously the real cylinder has a volume greater than 14cc but you see my point.

So yes, you can measure compression ratios by pressure changes.
But you are forgetting, as others have pointed out, that an engine cylinder is not effectively sealed until the valves close, which varies on different engines and can vary with cam timing. In general the inlet valve is still open when the piston is starting to make its way back up the cylinder on the compression stroke.

EDIT, looks like you deleted your post after I quoted you, sorry... paperbag

Edited by Mikey G on Saturday 30th November 10:42