clarke ali trolly jack failure......with me under the car!

clarke ali trolly jack failure......with me under the car!

Author
Discussion

Beedub

Original Poster:

1,959 posts

227 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
KaraK said:
I had a lucky escape a couple of years ago - we were jacking my mate's S2 up to check out some damage to the exhaust using the standard scissor jack and I stuck my head under to check that we had the clearance for the axle stand (no I don't know why I did either) and had just pulled clear when the scissor jack folded like paper!
scary st!!!

finlo

3,767 posts

204 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
Beedub said:
KaraK said:
I had a lucky escape a couple of years ago - we were jacking my mate's S2 up to check out some damage to the exhaust using the standard scissor jack and I stuck my head under to check that we had the clearance for the axle stand (no I don't know why I did either) and had just pulled clear when the scissor jack folded like paper!
scary st!!!
Years ago i was under a V8 SD1 fixing the exhaust
the front was up on ramps, somehow my elbow hit the selector rod and it came out of park! (no the back wheels wern't chocked)
Followed by an o st moment as it rolled off the ramps in slow motion.
I grabbed on to something and let it drag me along so the front wheels didn't go over me.
Fortunately i was a skinny git back then and got away without so much as a scratch.

i remember

3,296 posts

187 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
Acheron said:
I tend to use these. Lots of these;

Archeron's GT-R seen last week...



47p2

1,518 posts

162 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
Beedub said:
just out of interest is their any type of trolly jack that doesnt use fluid and hydraulics??
Air operated jacks are available, but you need a large compressor.

Slade Alive

784 posts

160 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
Slade Alive said:
The point is intelligent people who know nothing about vehicle maintenance may find the need of a jack at one time or another. They wouldn't necessarily understand the need to play safe with additional support. For this reason hydraulic jacking devices have to me more intelligent than the casual uninformed potential user. Cheap jack or not, all should be capable of sustained support otherwise they're life threatening.


THIS OF COURSE TAKES NOTHING AWAY FROM THE COMMON SENSE USE OF ADDITIONAL SUPPORT POINTED OUT BY MANY HERE.
BliarOut said:
All well and good in theory, but you're putting your life in the ability of a seal to hold against the oil pressure.
It's not a theory. It's fact that many put their lives in danger just as you say, which is exactly why a jack has to hold.




BliarOut said:
They all say to use stands in the instructions. They're a lifting device, not a holding device.
Calling it a lifting device, stating it's not a holding device is naive. Of course a jack is a holding device. If it were not it would be dangerous to the point of life threatening, as you pointed out. A hydraulic jack should incorporate a safety valve so as not to fall suddenly. Thus not reliant upon just a seal.





Westy Pre-Lit

5,087 posts

204 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
Beedub said:
so guys please please please use axle stands, i have ever since i started messing with cars.
A family friend was killed many years ago for not using axle stands and just relying on a jack.

Spending a few minutes to make sure everything is safe can save your life whatever the rating of a jack. I think of him every time I use one and that was over 25 years ago.

Edited by Westy Pre-Lit on Sunday 13th March 21:12

Night Runner

12,230 posts

195 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
Westy Pre-Lit said:
A family friend was killed many years ago for not using axle stands and just relying on a jack.

Spending a few minutes to make sure everything is safe can save your life whatever the rating of a jack. I think of him ever time I use one and that was over 25 years ago.
Our neighbour died the same way a few years back.

Huntsman

8,070 posts

251 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
I bought a Clarke jack, it failed after just a handful of times I had used it, the seals started to leak and I had to keep pumping it for it to maintain height. I took it back and got a refund.

I tend to avoid Clarke if I can.

BliarOut

72,857 posts

240 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
Slade Alive said:
Slade Alive said:
The point is intelligent people who know nothing about vehicle maintenance may find the need of a jack at one time or another. They wouldn't necessarily understand the need to play safe with additional support. For this reason hydraulic jacking devices have to me more intelligent than the casual uninformed potential user. Cheap jack or not, all should be capable of sustained support otherwise they're life threatening.


THIS OF COURSE TAKES NOTHING AWAY FROM THE COMMON SENSE USE OF ADDITIONAL SUPPORT POINTED OUT BY MANY HERE.
BliarOut said:
All well and good in theory, but you're putting your life in the ability of a seal to hold against the oil pressure.
It's not a theory. It's fact that many put their lives in danger just as you say, which is exactly why a jack has to hold.




BliarOut said:
They all say to use stands in the instructions. They're a lifting device, not a holding device.
Calling it a lifting device, stating it's not a holding device is naive. Of course a jack is a holding device. If it were not it would be dangerous to the point of life threatening, as you pointed out. A hydraulic jack should incorporate a safety valve so as not to fall suddenly. Thus not reliant upon just a seal.

It's not naive, it's years of experience as a young man with a five year apprenticeship behind me smile They shouldn't fail, but they do, hence they are a lifting device ONLY biggrin



Stu R

21,410 posts

216 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
Slade Alive said:
The point is intelligent people who know nothing about vehicle maintenance may find the need of a jack at one time or another. They should RTFM or let someone else do it.
EFA. I realise jacking a car isn't rocket science, but then to me neither are house boilers, electrics, full engine rebuilds and many other things. I still know when to step aside. If someone decides to operate outside of the scope of their knowledge on their heads be it - literally in this instance.


Slade Alive said:
It's not a theory. It's fact that many put their lives in danger just as you say, which is exactly why a jack has to hold.
A jack doesn't have to do anything other than jack.

A good jack probably will hold, but it will never suggest in the manual that you should do so. They're called jacks for a reason. If you don't like it, tough, frankly.

Slade Alive said:
BliarOut said:
They all say to use stands in the instructions. They're a lifting device, not a holding device.
Calling it a lifting device, stating it's not a holding device is naive. Of course a jack is a holding device. If it were not it would be dangerous to the point of life threatening, as you pointed out. A hydraulic jack should incorporate a safety valve so as not to fall suddenly. Thus not reliant upon just a seal.
Jacks are not a holding device - BlairOut is entirely correct and it isn't him who is being naive. People might use them as holding devices, but that doesn't mean they are, it's also why every instruction manual for a jack I've ever seen has said to use proper support because they are not a holding device. I could flog a bolt tight with a massive spanner, that doesn't make it a hammer.


Edited by Stu R on Sunday 13th March 21:35

Globs

13,841 posts

232 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
JM said:
Stu R said:
Costco jacks are very, very good.
I just recently got one, not used it much yet, but yea seems very good.

I also have a 20+ year old Halfords 2Ton jack that has had lots of use and is still going strong.
Same here - bought in 1985 mine I think.
TBH I always imagine the jack failing and use stands, even putting wheels under the sills will help if something decides to 'sink'. Being crushed below ones car would be so embarrassing..

Beedub

Original Poster:

1,959 posts

227 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
Huntsman said:
I bought a Clarke jack, it failed after just a handful of times I had used it, the seals started to leak and I had to keep pumping it for it to maintain height. I took it back and got a refund.

I tend to avoid Clarke if I can.
clarke..... not getting a good picture here are we......

Beedub

Original Poster:

1,959 posts

227 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
Slade Alive said:
Slade Alive said:
The point is intelligent people who know nothing about vehicle maintenance may find the need of a jack at one time or another. They wouldn't necessarily understand the need to play safe with additional support. For this reason hydraulic jacking devices have to me more intelligent than the casual uninformed potential user. Cheap jack or not, all should be capable of sustained support otherwise they're life threatening.


THIS OF COURSE TAKES NOTHING AWAY FROM THE COMMON SENSE USE OF ADDITIONAL SUPPORT POINTED OUT BY MANY HERE.
BliarOut said:
All well and good in theory, but you're putting your life in the ability of a seal to hold against the oil pressure.
It's not a theory. It's fact that many put their lives in danger just as you say, which is exactly why a jack has to hold.




BliarOut said:
They all say to use stands in the instructions. They're a lifting device, not a holding device.
Calling it a lifting device, stating it's not a holding device is naive. Of course a jack is a holding device. If it were not it would be dangerous to the point of life threatening, as you pointed out. A hydraulic jack should incorporate a safety valve so as not to fall suddenly. Thus not reliant upon just a seal.

that last part about a safety valve is imo a great shout!!!! why the hell are you saying it and not clarke????

Beedub

Original Poster:

1,959 posts

227 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
holy st... even the big ones fail....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oy3cJzl2dCA

BliarOut

72,857 posts

240 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
Beedub said:
Slade Alive said:
Slade Alive said:
The point is intelligent people who know nothing about vehicle maintenance may find the need of a jack at one time or another. They wouldn't necessarily understand the need to play safe with additional support. For this reason hydraulic jacking devices have to me more intelligent than the casual uninformed potential user. Cheap jack or not, all should be capable of sustained support otherwise they're life threatening.


THIS OF COURSE TAKES NOTHING AWAY FROM THE COMMON SENSE USE OF ADDITIONAL SUPPORT POINTED OUT BY MANY HERE.
BliarOut said:
All well and good in theory, but you're putting your life in the ability of a seal to hold against the oil pressure.
It's not a theory. It's fact that many put their lives in danger just as you say, which is exactly why a jack has to hold.




BliarOut said:
They all say to use stands in the instructions. They're a lifting device, not a holding device.
Calling it a lifting device, stating it's not a holding device is naive. Of course a jack is a holding device. If it were not it would be dangerous to the point of life threatening, as you pointed out. A hydraulic jack should incorporate a safety valve so as not to fall suddenly. Thus not reliant upon just a seal.

that last part about a safety valve is imo a great shout!!!! why the hell are you saying it and not clarke????
OK, you fit a safety valve and the jack slips, or you jack and then find out the jacking point is insecure. Now what will save you?

Beedub

Original Poster:

1,959 posts

227 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
well as were talking about a jack failing due to a seal leaking im not to sure your question is relevant??

if we go down your train of though, we better not use an axle stand.... that may collapse and fail, alots of things can happen BUT if its down to my own stupidy then fine, if its down to a substandard jack... not good.

as long as my jack is working properly, the car is safely supported on stands...... not much more else i can do except pray i go to heaven :-)

BliarOut

72,857 posts

240 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
I'd pop any removed wheels under there too wink

I'm not scaremongering, I understand the risks involved in lifting a car. I've had jacks fail and I've encountered rotten jacking points over the years. Improving the design of the lifting device still leaves you with other external factors that could kill you.

Ever tried frantically to lift a car with a jack as the jacking points sink into the body? yikes


Slade Alive

784 posts

160 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
It's s simple matter to point out the safety of a jack. To suggest a jack is a lifting device and not a supporting device is in itself foolish. If all a jack is capable of is lifting but not holding then it is dangerous unsafe life threatening, and should be avoided at all costs - end of.

NOTHING TO DO WITH GREAT ADVICE TO USE ALTERNATIVE SUPPORTING EQUIPMENT.

Mains plugs aren't removable these days for a reason. Soon you won't be able to purchase a jack without a two leg beam support, built in ratchet lock, life insurance and membership to BUPA. That's providing you can produce your Halfords trade card of course. But thanks for missing the point for the sake of argument. It's about the price tag - sorry - quality.

BliarOut

72,857 posts

240 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
:taptap: Can. You. Read?

Globs

13,841 posts

232 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
BliarOut said:
Ever tried frantically to lift a car with a jack as the jacking points sink into the body? yikes
Ah, happy memories of British Leyland wink