To tag axle or not

Author
Discussion

TryingHard

Original Poster:

409 posts

232 months

Friday 5th June 2020
quotequote all
We have recently sold our 2004 single axle motorhome as I wanted a newer one with air-con / better engine etc.

It was a perfect layout, and a newer version of what we had would be perfect (albeit appear quite rare). However, we are also tempted by a tag-axle. Obvious advantages are more space, and generally better spec, but I'm slightly concerned about the additional length and particularly traction (FWD) and manoeuvrability.

Also hear reports about French campsites not allowing tag axles but that doesn't concern me that much (most camping will be in the UK).

Length of vans are as follows:
Our old motorhome: 7.33m
Equivalent newer single axle: 7.7m
Tag-axle: 8.7m

A metre doesn't sound that much but it is 1.4M bigger than our old one.

Any advice / experiences (both positive and negative)?


jensencars

66 posts

74 months

Saturday 6th June 2020
quotequote all
Hi,
We had a burstner i821 Tag axle and we towed a Toyota Aygo On an A frame with it,
loved It no issues at all with anything in Uk or Europe(only event was a dispute over the correct tolls for Austrian autoroutes)
We had the fiat ducatto version, and the extra space was well worth having, also had the wet system heating so proper heating as opposed to blown air.
Shame would still have it now if I hadn’t of been made redundant unexpectedly and at my age new I was gonna struggle to get another decent job
Good luck

smifffymoto

4,567 posts

206 months

Sunday 7th June 2020
quotequote all
It seems the British go for the biggest they can afford and the French go for the smallest they can get away with. I have lived in France 10 years,owned a campsite for 3 of those years and can honestly say I can count the number of twin axle camping cars I have seen on one hand.

oblio

5,413 posts

228 months

Thursday 11th June 2020
quotequote all
We are on our second Tag axle (Autotrail Comanche) and wouldn't change it for the world tbh. It is also 8.7m long

Loads of living space; loads of payload; loads of 'man lockers'; very steady drive; corners as if on rails.

Downsides...

- I always check every campsite to make sure that they can accept us due to the length (not that it has twin axles). 9/10 can take us in my experience. I have never been refused in France and we regularly go there and travel through there en route to other countries. I never mention twin axles and it has never been an issue.
- Twin axle/over 3500kg MH's attract higher road tax usage rates in countries where they are in use, such as Austria for example. This could be down to the weight as they are over 3500kg rather than the twin axles.
- 8.7m makes it that much more difficult to park in towns etc but tbh that's difficult enough with most MH's anyway!

smile

Edited to add:

I suppose I will have to cough up for 6 tyres and not 4 when they need replacing. You do get some scrubbing on the rear tyres when tightly manoeuvring but I've not noticed any downside to that tbh.

As a side note base service and habitation checks cost the same as for a single rear axle MH.


Edited by oblio on Friday 12th June 08:46

TryingHard

Original Poster:

409 posts

232 months

Friday 12th June 2020
quotequote all
Thanks for all the responses.

Still looking around at the moment but less worried about tag axles than perhaps I was.

oblio

5,413 posts

228 months

Friday 12th June 2020
quotequote all
TryingHard said:
Thanks for all the responses.

Still looking around at the moment but less worried about tag axles than perhaps I was.
I just re-read your OP and you mentioned traction on the front wheels. Yes this is not great on wet grass but it's not great with any decent sized Mh tbh.

I make sure I have kit on board just in case I get stuck (which I carried in my single axle as well): towing eye, tow rope, grip king (or similar). I have only had to use the grip king stuff once in the Netherlands!

smile

TryingHard

Original Poster:

409 posts

232 months

Wednesday 29th July 2020
quotequote all
So thought I would update this with a conclusion.

We went for it and have bought an Auto trail Arapaho. Journey home was uneventful and having the 3L (with comformatic) the drive was much better and smoother than my last one.

Have to say it is quite thirsty (cruising at 65 we averaged 19mpg mostly motorway) over about 300 miles. Not going to worry about it though.

First trip away this weekend.

oblio

5,413 posts

228 months

Wednesday 29th July 2020
quotequote all
thumbup

Nice one! Is that the one with the huge rear lounge?

Just a tip: try dropping the speed to a steady 60mph. Our last Comanche was a 2012 with the 3l engine and on long runs at 60 I could get 27+.

smile

TryingHard

Original Poster:

409 posts

232 months

Saturday 1st August 2020
quotequote all
oblio said:
thumbup

Nice one! Is that the one with the huge rear lounge?

Just a tip: try dropping the speed to a steady 60mph. Our last Comanche was a 2012 with the 3l engine and on long runs at 60 I could get 27+.

smile
It is indeed the rear lounge layout - same as our old one just bigger but works for us with the two children. Away in it now for a tester weekend - navigated some very small lanes (Cornwall) no problems so confidence growing.

You’re right about the speed but it was a long day anyway (had driven up there as well). but also I do need to change my driving style in it as I do have a bit of a heavy foot.

oblio

5,413 posts

228 months

Sunday 2nd August 2020
quotequote all
Nice one thumbup

The width is comparable to any/most coachbuilts really so hopefully there shouldn't be much difference over a shorter MH regarding lane driving tbh.

smile