Modern Architecture

Author
Discussion

gregs656

Original Poster:

10,879 posts

181 months

Friday 18th October 2019
quotequote all
Is there a good book that covers off ideas and theories of modern (C20/21) architecture for lay people?

I find it fascinating but I don't really know much about it.

BryanC

1,107 posts

238 months

Sunday 20th October 2019
quotequote all
An interesting challenge.
My view ( which might not be where you heading ) is to first read Reynor Banham - 'theory and design in the first machine age' which will cover the new ideas of structure limiting the built form of the time. That introduces steel, concrete and cantilever.

That would then be a foundation on understanding the eclectic styles of the Modern Period and where new materials took them.

I suggest that would lead to understanding some of the more modern interpretations and styles.

As an aside, my own study has been paralleled with the art of the period which if you look carefully follows the same general principle. As an example look at the dutch architecture of Rietfeld and the art of Mondrian.

Hope this helps.

Dr Slotter

408 posts

146 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
20th Century Society's '100 Buildings, 100 Years' book covers a lot of it in passing as it describes each of the buildings.


cardigankid

8,849 posts

212 months

Sunday 17th November 2019
quotequote all
It’s a big subject. That’s your problem. Reyner Banham is fine, but he was one of the authoritarian propagandists of Modernism, particularly the Gods of Modernism who were beyond criticism..... he wrote Architecture of the Well Tempered Environment, and Age of the Masters. You may get a warped perspective. Or you may understand how they went so catastrophically wrong.

You could do worse than read the latest edition of Banister Fletcher, History of Architecture, which is at least objective.

Or try Osbert Lancasters Cartoon History of Architecture, which is fun.

Having done that, try A Global History of Architecture by Francis D K Ching. Frank Ching is a genius. He has written a number of other books, including an Introduction to Architecture.

Then, if you want to know what really happens, read The Honeywood File.

Bear in mind, there are few subjects which give people more scope to talk complete bullst. If a book gets incomprehensible, bin it. And also remember, if you haven’t physically been in a building you don’t really understand it.

Equus

16,884 posts

101 months

Monday 18th November 2019
quotequote all
cardigankid said:
I
Bear in mind, there are few subjects which give people more scope to talk complete bullst. .... And also remember, if you haven’t physically been in a building you don’t really understand it.
Ain't that the truth!

BryanC

1,107 posts

238 months

Monday 18th November 2019
quotequote all
The above comments made me smile knowingly. Slightly off topic but I think worthwhile making.

Having been in Practice for more years than I care to remember, my bookshelves creak with books on all aspects of the profession. Last week, I decided to hang my t square up at the year end which sees me concluding a bespoke house for a lady client who ended up a close friend and holiday partner.
( they don't teach you that at architecture school )

That allows me to strongly endorse The Honeywood File as essential reading to anybody getting interested in this profession, and a similar book brought upto date called 'The Rubicon File'

When I was appointed to start the design work, she had been very disillusioned by a previous project, so i bought her the book as a Christmas present to introduce the reality of domestic architecture.

We are very close to completion and I had cause to reminder her with this Rubicon image - the reality !


cardigankid

8,849 posts

212 months

Monday 18th November 2019
quotequote all
BryanC said:
...... the year end which sees me concluding a bespoke house for a lady client who ended up a close friend and holiday partner.
( they don't teach you that at architecture school ).....
I'm sure FLW used to do stuff like that, so you are in good company!

cardigankid

8,849 posts

212 months

Wednesday 20th November 2019
quotequote all
Equus said:
cardigankid said:
I
Bear in mind, there are few subjects which give people more scope to talk complete bullst. .... And also remember, if you haven’t physically been in a building you don’t really understand it.
Ain't that the truth!
I guess that you are accusing me of making a poncey pseudo intellectual remark about something rather commonplace. You don’t need to understand a Persimmon home, you just need to live in it. But if someone is taking a serious interest in architecture he is going to see pictures of a load of buildings some of which he will like and some not. But there is a danger in looking at seductive photography and thinking that you ‘get’ the Stuttgart Staatsgalerie or Villa Savoie or Fallingwater, when you are in reality missing most of the really good stuff. It’s like Stonehenge, Brodgar or Avebury. Nobody really knows why they were built but do you stand the slightest chance of understanding them without actually going there? (Preferably naked, stoned, and at the summer solstice!)

Equus

16,884 posts

101 months

Saturday 23rd November 2019
quotequote all
cardigankid said:
I guess that you are accusing me of making a poncey pseudo intellectual remark about something rather commonplace.
No, I was merely agreeing with you, on both points.

cardigankid

8,849 posts

212 months

Sunday 24th November 2019
quotequote all
Oh, sorry! Too quick to go into defensive mode.