RE: New British sports car: exclusive

RE: New British sports car: exclusive

Author
Discussion

The Wiz

5,875 posts

263 months

Monday 7th August 2006
quotequote all
mechsympathy said:
Yugguy said:
*cough SNIFFPETROL *cough




Just thinking the same. Also can't help thinking Strathcarron ...

mtv dave

2,101 posts

257 months

Monday 7th August 2006
quotequote all
Keep thinking It's just a BRG Marlin 5exi myself, but I was never exposed to the Strathcarron.

old64er

1,388 posts

239 months

Monday 7th August 2006
quotequote all
I must be honest.
Now i have just looked at the Marlin webpage and seen their version of the front end, i prefer the marlin.
Make your own from a rover 25??? with the T series turbo lump from a 800 vitesse.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Monday 7th August 2006
quotequote all
The Marlin 5exi was, I believe, based on the Strathcarron moulds, however it uses a spaceframe chassis rather than the Strathcarron's, and now Javan's monocoque. Davi's comments on the driveshafts is interesting as when the 5exi was released, there were some photos showing it's driveshafts at quite an extreme angle.

The Wiz

5,875 posts

263 months

Monday 7th August 2006
quotequote all
mtv dave said:
Keep thinking It's just a BRG Marlin 5exi myself, but I was never exposed to the Strathcarron.


www.pistonheads.com/doc.asp?c=47&i=2923

LooseCannon

288 posts

228 months

Monday 7th August 2006
quotequote all
Getting a bit tired of this "Noddy goes to Le Mans" styling look, can anyone do something different without copying the Enzo?

housemaster

2,076 posts

228 months

Monday 7th August 2006
quotequote all
The Wiz said:
mechsympathy said:
Yugguy said:
*cough SNIFFPETROL *cough




Just thinking the same. Also can't help thinking Strathcarron ...

Yup, with you guys. I have been saying it for weeks, nice to see the 'sniffsters' are on the same wavelength this month...

schmokin1

1,212 posts

213 months

Monday 7th August 2006
quotequote all
the Strathcarron went down because they didnt have the money to redevelop the pitiful botch of a rear suspension / subframe that reynard special vehicles came up with. Among other probs was that the rear beam axle fouled the diff casing on full bump, the engine and transmission were mounted too high (as a consequence of the fouling?) hence the driveshaft angle issue, particularly of the N/S driveshaft which is the short one. the shock top mounts were also prone to bending as the geometry was a bit squiff, necessitating rose jointed shock top mounts, as I recall. The money ran out, the development was frozen, and the subsequent track test by EVO against the elise showed the problems up. as a suposed driver's car it was always going to struggle with that start, and the company would have had to charge 30K to make any money out of the car anyway....

then came the emissions prob with the modded triumph motor just to add to the woe.

I understand the original MD bought the remains of the company and has redeveloped the rear end and installed a Roush tweaked supercharged Puma engine, which has sorted the car. however it seems as though he is content to keep it as his own toy rather than marketing it himself (unless he has teamed up with Javan, does anyone know?). I am sure he is less than happy that Marlin appear to have copied the shape though, but unless you have deep pockets for lawyers this sort of thing is difficult to stop I guess....

cheers all

schmo

paul holroyd

82 posts

232 months

Monday 7th August 2006
quotequote all
Can’t make my mind up on this one.. Like you say 30k is a lot of money for an unknown make.
It looks like the MG, TRV and a bit of the rear end of the Porsche GT and the Zonda have fallen into a mixing bowl and this is the result... but it does look well. The epoxy-bonded thing sounds expensive if you have a bump "sorry sir you cant buy the front wing you have to buy the complete shell".

Paul Holroyd

Porsche Motorsport Artist
www.porschesport.com

Davi

17,153 posts

221 months

Monday 7th August 2006
quotequote all
paul holroyd said:
"sorry sir you cant buy the front wing you have to buy the complete shell".



The bonding relates to the tub and front rear subframes attachment, the outer skin is seperate and in several parts, so cant see that being a problem to get replacements for.

Sam_68

9,939 posts

246 months

Monday 7th August 2006
quotequote all
LexSport said:
The Marlin 5exi was, I believe, based on the Strathcarron moulds, however it uses a spaceframe chassis rather than the Strathcarron's, and now Javan's monocoque. Davi's comments on the driveshafts is interesting as when the 5exi was released, there were some photos showing it's driveshafts at quite an extreme angle.


If it has an aluminium tub, as claimed, then it's a new chassis design, but since both companies (Marlin and Javan) are based in Cornwall, I'd guess they are closely related.

Still, why worry? The chances of them actually selling more than a handful, as SniffPetrol has deduced, are pretty slim.

Dakkon

7,826 posts

254 months

Monday 7th August 2006
quotequote all
What I wonder with these sorts of cars is, am I beter off buying a second hand Elise and paying for the Honda engine conversion in that, than something like this?

The Wiz

5,875 posts

263 months

Monday 7th August 2006
quotequote all
Sam_68 said:
LexSport said:
The Marlin 5exi was, I believe, based on the Strathcarron moulds, however it uses a spaceframe chassis rather than the Strathcarron's, and now Javan's monocoque. Davi's comments on the driveshafts is interesting as when the 5exi was released, there were some photos showing it's driveshafts at quite an extreme angle.


If it has an aluminium tub, as claimed, then it's a new chassis design, but since both companies (Marlin and Javan) are based in Cornwall, I'd guess they are closely related.


Yep brotther and sister as well as husband and wife !

schmokin1

1,212 posts

213 months

Monday 7th August 2006
quotequote all
the Strathcarron used an aluminium honeycomb tub laser cut from flat sections and then bonded with similar glue to that used by lotus for the elise (well proven technology in the aviation world). tubular steel subframes front and rear for the suspension etc

schmo

celm

14 posts

216 months

Monday 7th August 2006
quotequote all
for that price then can keep it

Chris71

21,536 posts

243 months

Monday 7th August 2006
quotequote all
Haha, was going to mention Sniff Petrol, the 5exi and the Strathcaron, but seems I've been beaten to it

Hmmm, another well intentioned sports car maker that'll be bankrupt by christmas......

nightmare

5,188 posts

285 months

Monday 7th August 2006
quotequote all
30k sounds pretty reasonable to me for a sub 4 second 0-60 and a standing quarter close to murcielago territory.

i never get the 'you'd be better spending that money on an elise and then getting it supercharged' argument. Yesh, and you could buy an MR2 and get it faster than a 911 if you felt that way inclined but that's hardly the point is it?

Ther seems a healthy market for trackdays-stylee cars with road going credibiity - such as Atom, radicals etc... so this seems a fair plan. I'm very seriously considering the new Caparo but could get a genuine F1 car for less than half the price....

jack blag

941 posts

214 months

Monday 7th August 2006
quotequote all
I drove a Strathcarron a few years ago and I have to say it was a lot of fun! The back end would step out at every opportunity on roundabouts with the slightest of provocation, and that was on dry roads, but it was very easy to control. It had the Triumph bike engine which sounded good, but lacked the power of the Honda lump. The worst thing about it was the gearbox... awful!

I ended up buying an Elise 111S (Mk1) shortly afterwards...

james21

8 posts

231 months

Monday 7th August 2006
quotequote all
Yugguy said:
*cough SNIFFPETROL *cough


Exactly what I was thinking, very funny indeed!

cymtriks

4,560 posts

246 months

Monday 7th August 2006
quotequote all
Sam_68 said:
It seems to be a re-branding/redevelopment of the Marlin 5EXI kit car, which as others have pointed out, was based on the moulds for the Strathcarron, bought at the bancruptcy sale.


I actually put this question to the Marlin MD at the NEC motorshow last year. I expected her to say yes and that it had saved development costs or something but no....

She bluntly denied any connection with Strathcarron.

She then went on to accuse me of spying for another kit car maker and attempting to "steal their ideas" which she "knew happened". Someone may wish to copy her ideas and possibly someone has done so. Not me though. I wonder which idea she was thinking of? Fibreglass bodywork? A spaceframe chassis? A transverse engine? The over complex and not very light wishbones?

I also heard (on PH? can't recall!) that the real Strathcarron project including the Reynard chassis had been sold to someone in Cornwall. Perhaps this is it.