Want to see inside an F1 V10?

Want to see inside an F1 V10?

Author
Discussion

RyanDD

Original Poster:

96 posts

152 months

Wednesday 30th October 2013
quotequote all
http://f1displayed.com/

Amazing detail here, I've been reading the cylinder head part. very impressed


dr_gn

16,172 posts

185 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
Is that really an F1 head? The casting and machining quality look crap.

Adrian W

13,900 posts

229 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
Is that really an F1 head? The casting and machining quality look crap.
You think? It looks exactly fit for purpose, look how perfect the components are.

350Matt

3,740 posts

280 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
that can't be one of the last V10's at only 15K rpm and 850 bhp thats more likely to be 3.5 ltr engine from the early 90's

towards the end these things were 18K+ and well over 900 bhp from 3.0 ltrs

dr_gn

16,172 posts

185 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
Adrian W said:
dr_gn said:
Is that really an F1 head? The casting and machining quality look crap.
You think? It looks exactly fit for purpose, look how perfect the components are.
I was commenting on the casting, and the machining of the casting, not the components. Some of the casting machining looks like it was done by a backstreet recon shop.

Tango13

8,460 posts

177 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
I was commenting on the casting, and the machining of the casting, not the components. Some of the casting machining looks like it was done by a backstreet recon shop.
Having spent the past 25yrs making all sorts of parts for aircraft, nuclear submarines, nuclear power stations, plastic heart valves and CO2 detectors that are accurate to 5 parts in a million that ended up on board a shuttle mission...



















I thought exactly the same!

dr_gn

16,172 posts

185 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
Tango13 said:
dr_gn said:
I was commenting on the casting, and the machining of the casting, not the components. Some of the casting machining looks like it was done by a backstreet recon shop.
Having spent the past 25yrs making all sorts of parts for aircraft, nuclear submarines, nuclear power stations, plastic heart valves and CO2 detectors that are accurate to 5 parts in a million that ended up on board a shuttle mission...



















I thought exactly the same!
I worked in a foundry for ten years, and the last 6 or so I've been involved with manufacturing research/design. I've visited a lot of state of the art engineering facilites, including f1 teams, and seen (and made) a lot of very expensive parts.

I'd be surprised if that cylinder head was ever fitted in the back of an F1 car. Maybe a POC piece, but way below par for F1 IMO. The casting is full of flaws, and some of the facing operations look like they've had at least two attempts at getting it right. Bad show old boy.

dr_gn

16,172 posts

185 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
350Matt said:
that can't be one of the last V10's at only 15K rpm and 850 bhp thats more likely to be 3.5 ltr engine from the early 90's

towards the end these things were 18K+ and well over 900 bhp from 3.0 ltrs
Hart/Arrows V10 according to comments on the website (probably from a '98 Arrows A19?):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrows_A19

Maybe it was fitted to a car in that state after all ...



PhillipM

6,524 posts

190 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
I was commenting on the casting, and the machining of the casting, not the components. Some of the casting machining looks like it was done by a backstreet recon shop.
Have you not seen some of the rear machined parts around the brake ducts stuck on the Renault this year? I'd be ashamed if some of that stuff had come off my mill.

dr_gn

16,172 posts

185 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
PhillipM said:
dr_gn said:
I was commenting on the casting, and the machining of the casting, not the components. Some of the casting machining looks like it was done by a backstreet recon shop.
Have you not seen some of the rear machined parts around the brake ducts stuck on the Renault this year? I'd be ashamed if some of that stuff had come off my mill.
Renault engine brake ducts? you've lost me.

PhillipM

6,524 posts

190 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
No, the rear of the Renault F1 car...

dr_gn

16,172 posts

185 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
PhillipM said:
No, the rear of the Renault F1 car...
There isn't a Renault F1 car this year (unless I missed some name change somewhere along the line), but some cars have Renault engines.

Tango13

8,460 posts

177 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
Tango13 said:
dr_gn said:
I was commenting on the casting, and the machining of the casting, not the components. Some of the casting machining looks like it was done by a backstreet recon shop.
Having spent the past 25yrs making all sorts of parts for aircraft, nuclear submarines, nuclear power stations, plastic heart valves and CO2 detectors that are accurate to 5 parts in a million that ended up on board a shuttle mission...

I thought exactly the same!
I worked in a foundry for ten years, and the last 6 or so I've been involved with manufacturing research/design. I've visited a lot of state of the art engineering facilites, including f1 teams, and seen (and made) a lot of very expensive parts.

I'd be surprised if that cylinder head was ever fitted in the back of an F1 car. Maybe a POC piece, but way below par for F1 IMO. The casting is full of flaws, and some of the facing operations look like they've had at least two attempts at getting it right. Bad show old boy.
yes

Looking at that casting you can tell by the machining marks that the aluminium is of a st quality to use the correct technical term. Cheap and nasty castings are a bd to machine because either the aluminium sticks to the cutting tools or the foundry haven't cleaned the casting properly so the left over sand wears the tools out.

I'm sure I read somewhere that Cosworth used to pump their molten aluminium up into their mould using a pump from a nuclear power station so they could sand cast to die cast quality.

Also, why was the article making such a big deal over the valves being splayed radially? Honda were doing that with their RFVC engines back in the eighties and Rudge were doing it back in the 1930's ffs!

Steve UK

290 posts

187 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
Certainly is an old engine, still impressive though as it was from a true independent.

After this year it is looking very unlikely F1 will ever have an independent engine manufacturer again?

Superb article here, so much information on what is probably a much underestimated engine.

https://www.highpowermedia.com/p/1164/race_engine_...

RemarkLima

2,379 posts

213 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
PhillipM said:
No, the rear of the Renault F1 car...
There isn't a Renault F1 car this year (unless I missed some name change somewhere along the line), but some cars have Renault engines.
Lotus?

PhillipM

6,524 posts

190 months

Saturday 2nd November 2013
quotequote all
Yeah, that one hehe

Zad

12,707 posts

237 months

Saturday 2nd November 2013
quotequote all
Could it be a 1-off pre-production prototype? One to perform destructive strength tests, ensure clearances, access to valve stem seals etc? It looks like the everyday stuff I come across (but then I'm in the electronics side of engineering) fine for a development machine but lacking something special.